Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 9/2016

№ 9/2016

Fìnansi Ukr. 2016 (9): 65–0

MONETARY POLICY

SHVETS Serhij 1

1SI “Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3102-9784


Fiscal seigniorage and inflation in Ukraine


The impact of fiscal seigniorage on CPI, as deficit monetization, is discussed in the article. The seigniorage phenomenon is examined from the standpoint of comparing three concepts of estimation: monetary, opportunity cost, and fiscal. It is shown up that seigniorage in percentage of GDP in Ukraine over 2005-2015 had downturn dynamics due to changes in priorities of money issuing objectives alongside the decline in the real sector crediting to the advantage of solving problems of budget deficit financing, and providing operations on the foreign exchange market. The Laffer`s curve plotted for seigniorage, based on Ukraine`s economy as an example, made it possible to estimate the optimal level of consumer price inflation in Ukraine over 2005-2015 on average of 11% (measured correspondingly in the end of the period), which corresponds to the maximum amount of seigniorage revenues. The econometric macro model of fiscal-monetary interaction in Ukraine on a quarterly basis is presented to provide the scenario modeling of CPI dynamics in comparison with the volume of domestic government bonds issuing in 2016. Based on scenario modeling, it is determined that the optimal level of CPI is about 19% (measured correspondingly in the end of the period) given maximum revenues through fiscal seigniorage realized to redeem domestic government bonds of 130 billion UAH by the NBU on the primary stock markets.

Keywords:seigniorage, public debt, fiscal-monetary interaction, inflation, scenario modeling.

JEL: E17, E31, H63, H68.


Shvets S. . Fiscal seigniorage and inflation in Ukraine / S. Shvets // Фінанси України. - 2016. - № 9. - C. 65-0.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 65 - 78) DownloadDownloads :251
1. Bohdan, T., Bohdan, І. (2013). Modelling the impact of debt policy on economic development of Ukraine. Bulletin of the National Bank of Ukraine, 10, 20-27 [in Ukrainian].
2. Serebryans`ky`j, D., Kapelyush, A. (2015). The interaction of fiscal and monetary policies in the financial economic stabilization Ukraine. Bulletin of the National Bank of Ukraine, 6, 22–28 [in Ukrainian].
3. Shevchuk, V. (2010). Mutual influence of fiscal and monetary policy in Ukraine (1998-2009 years). Socio-economic problems of the modern period Ukraine. The financial market of Ukraine, stabilization and European integration, 1 (81), 15–22 [in Ukrainian].
4. Cukrowski, J. (2001). Financing budget deficit by central bank seigniorage in selected transitional economies: a comparative study. Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE) Publications, Discontinued Series, 37, 45.
5. Hochreiter, E., Rovelli, R. (2002). The generation and distribution of central bank seigniorage in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 223, 391–415.
6. Budina, N., Hanousek, J., Tůma, Z. (1995). Money demand and seigniorage in transition Eastern European Economics. The Czech Economy in Transition, Vol. 33, No 1, 54–73.
7. Samimi, A. J., Nademi, Y., Ghaderi, S., Hosseinzadeh, R. (2012). Inflation and inflation tax in developing countries; a panel threshold approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics & Management, Vol. 1, No 1, 82.
8. Chakraborty, L. (2015). Fiscal seigniorage “Laffer-curve effect” on central bank autonomy in India. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Working Papers, 156,
40.
9. Walsh, C. (2010). Monetary theory and policy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10. Neumann, M. (1996). A comparative study of seigniorage: Japan and Germany. BOJ Monetary and Economic Studies, Vol. 14, No 1, 104-142.
11. Cagan, P. (1956). The monetary dynamics of hyperinflation. Studies in the quantity theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Takeshita, T. (2003). An analysis of the annual change in the government investment multiplier in the Japanese economy using several model types. Journal of Applied Input-Output Analysis, 9, 1-34.