№ 3/2019

Fìnansi Ukr. 2019 (3): 73–91https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.03.073

FINANCE OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE

PAVLIUK Klavdiia ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-6630

Interrelation of research findings and financing of science: foreign experience

The article addresses the important issue of the scale and effectiveness of spending on science, the possibility of rationalizing the funding of research and development, depending on the productivity and quality of research. The question of the relationship of the evaluation of research and financing of science is especially important in the modern conditions of Ukraine. The state and trends of financing science in the OECD countries, in particular the leader of EU research and innovation – the Federal Republic of Germany, are analyzed. The dynamics and structure of the financing of science in Germany are considered. It is indicated that gross domestic spending for domestic research and development tends to increase and practically reached the 3% spending limit of GDP, which is assumed by the Europe 2020 Strategy while driving social wealth and the country's competitiveness are research and development in the business sector. State funding of research and development in the German economy is directed to projects focused on applied research. Institutional support for R&D is also used. The tendencies of financing universities, non-university research institutions, and state research institutes are considered. It is noted that the volumes and instruments of financing the branches of science, research directions, scientific institutions in Germany, as in other European countries, are now associated with the results of the evaluation of science. Such assessments provide information on the distribution of limited resources, with the introduction of new tools and mechanisms for science management. Various procedures for the implementation of assessments are considered, their features are shown. The importance of a combination of external evaluation, self-assessment and monitoring of evaluation results is indicated.

Keywords:science, financing, quality, performance, evaluation, self-assessment, monitoring

JEL: H52, I22, I23

PAVLIUK K. . Interrelation of research findings and financing of science: foreign experience / K. . PAVLIUK // Фінанси України. - 2019. - № 3. - C. 73-91.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 73 - 91)

Download

Downloads :181

1. Lukinov, I. I. (1997). Economic transformations (late 20th century). Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, Instytut ekonomiky [in Ukrainian].
2. Pavliuk, K. V. (2006). Budget and budget process in the conditions of a transitory economy of Ukraine. Kyiv: NDFI [in Ukrainian].
3. President of Ukraine. (2015). Sustainable development strategy "Ukraine 2020" (Order No. 5/2015, January 12). Retrieved from zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5/2015 [in Ukrainian].
4. Binswanger, M. (2011). Der Publikationswettbewerb in der Forschung: Arroganzen, Ignoranzen, Redundanzen. Retrieved from www.leibniz-institut.de/archiv/binswanger_
5. Gülker, S., Simon, D. (2011). Nach der Evaluation ist vor der Evaluation? Institutionelle Folgen von Forschungsbewertungen im internationalen Vergleich. Retrieved from www.eerqi.eu/sites/default/files/Evaluation_%20New%20Balance%20of%20Power_.pdf#page=83.
6. Krull, W. (2011). Bewertung, Begutachtung und Evaluation in Wissenschaft und Forschung. Retrieved from www.eerqi.eu/sites/default/files/Evaluation_%20New%20Balance%20of%20Power_.pdf#page=15.
7. Simon, D. (2003). Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft durch Evaluationen? Retrieved from www.wissenschaftsforschung.de/JB03_9-21.pdf.
8. Torka, M. (2011). Institutioneller gleich handlungspraktischer Wandel? Das Beispiel von Begutachtungs-praktiken bei der Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Einrich tungen. Retrieved from www.eerqi.eu/sites/default/files/Evaluation_%20New%20Balance%20of%20Power_.pdf#page=69.
9. Yanik, A. A., Popova, S. M. (2016). The main features of modern science policy in Germany. Retrieved from e-notabene.ru/pr/article_18931.html [in Russian].
10. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and comprehensive growth. Brussels. Retrieved from old.minjust.gov.ua/file/31493.doc [in Ukrainian].
11. OECD. (n. d.). OECD data. Retrieved from data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm.
12. OECD. (n. d.). Gross domestic spending on R&D. Retrieved from data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm.
13. Koppel, O., Bican, P. M., & Brem, A. (2017). Forschungsförderung in Deutschland – effektiv und zielgerichtet? Retrieved from archiv.wirtschaftsdienst.eu/jahr/2017/9/forschungsfoerderung-in-deutschland-effektiv-und-zielgerichtet/.
doi.org/10.1007/s10273-017-2187-1
14. Stifterverband. (2017). "Rr qn 'dJ Zahlenwerk 2017 – Forschung und Entwicklung in der Wirtschaft 2015. Retrieved from www.stifterverband.org/arendi-zahlenwerk_2017.
15. Schulz, A., Schneider, B., Eichstädt, H., & Fußmann, M. (2018). Bildungsausgaben. Budget für Bildung, Forschung und Wissenschaft 2015/2016. Retrieved from www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/BildungForschungKultur/BildungKulturFinanzen/BildungsausgabenPDF_5217108.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
16. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. (2016). Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation 2016. Retrieved from www.bmbf.de/pub/Bufi_2016_Hauptband.pdf.
17. Schasse, U., Gehrke, B., & Stenke, G. (2018). Forschung und Entwicklung in Staat und Wirtschaft. Retrieved from www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Innovationsstudien_2018/StuDIS_
18. Wixforth, J. (2012). Langfristige Entwicklung der außeruniversitären Forschung¬sförderung in Deutschland. Retrieved from archiv.wirtschaftsdienst.eu/jahr/2012/3/entwicklung-der-ausseruniversitaeren-forschungsfoerderung/search/wei%3F/1240/.
19. Die Union der deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.akademienunion.de/en/the-union/the-concept-of-the-academy-a-brief-history/.
20. Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.leopoldina.org/de/leopoldina-home/.
21. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.mpg.de/.
22. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.fraunhofer.de/.
23. Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.helmholtz.de/.
24. Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.leibniz-gemeinschaft.de/start/.
25. Barlösius, E. (2011). Der Wandel der Ressortforschungseinrichtungen während des Evaluationsprozesses. In Evaluation: new balance of power? (pp. 57–68). Retrieved from www.eerqi.eu/sites/default/files/Evaluation_%20New%20Balance%20of%20Power_.pdf#page=57.
26. Gülker, S., Simon, D., & Torka, M. (2013). Externe Kontrolle und kollegiale Rückmeldung. Zu einer konstitutiven Spannung in institutionellen Evaluationen der Wissenschaft. Retrieved from www.academia.edu/14950716/Externe_Kontrolle_und_kollegiale_Ru_ckmeldung._Zu_einer_konstitutiven_Spannung_in_institutionellen_Evaluationen_der_Wissenschaft_2013_.
27. Deutscher Bundestag. (2016). Zum Evaluationsverfahren der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft. Retrieved from www.bundestag.de/blob/485872/b25aec91e98556eb2b4f3c9e756b2b67/
28. Biedermann, W. (2003). Zur Evaluation außeruniversitärer Forschung in der Diskussion der Institutsdirektoren der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft. Das Verhältnis von Sach- zu Personalausgaben. Retrieved from www.wissenschaftsforschung.de/JB03_143-190.pdf.
29. Iefymenko, T. I. (2016). Conceptual approaches to science funding mechanisms' development. Finance of Ukraine, 8, 9–23 [in Ukrainian].
30. Die Vermessung der Wissenschaft. Messung und Beurteilung von Qualität in der Forschung. (2014). Zeitschrift für hochschulrecht, hochschulmanagement und hochschulpolitik, 6. Retrieved from www.wissenschaftsrat.ac.at/news/Messung_Endversion_inkl%20Cover.pdf.
31. Qualitätsmessung: E. Lütkemeier: Das Forschungsrating des Wissenschaftsrats. (2009, May 25). H-Soz-Kult. Retrieved from www.hsozkult.de/debate/id/diskussionen-1105.
32. The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (n. d.). Methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific institutions of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.nas.gov.ua/text/pdfNews/metodyka_text.pdf [in Ukrainian].
33. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2017). On approval of the Procedure for conducting state certification of scientific institutions (Decree No. 540, July 19). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ru/540-2017-%D0%BF [in Ukrainian].
34. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2018). Some issues of state attestation of scientific institutions (Order No. 1008, September 17). Retrieved from search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/RE32956.html [in Ukrainian].