№ 10/2019

Fìnansi Ukr. 2019 (10): 73–88https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.10.073

TAX POLICY

KOSHCHUK Tetiana ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-4603

Ways to improve taxation for digital companies

It haidentified that there are exacerbations of tax evasion and tax avoidance issues that arise from the particularities of providing services by large digital companies and changing digital business models in the face of dynamic technological advances. Measures already approved globally to counteract aggressive tax planning do not effectively address the challenge of fair taxation on digital income. The OECD is considering further changes in international taxation to improve taxation for digital companies. The European Commission has also put forward initiatives for a harmonized digital services tax (a short-term proposal) and for corporate income tax based on establishing a significant digital presence (a long-term solution). However, the adoption of relevant global and pan-European decisions is currently facing a number of rather significant economic obstacles (primarily the risks of double taxation and slowdown in GDP growth, different national tax strategies of companies), as well as technical and political complications. Some EU members, unwilling to wait for consensus at the international level, are developing national measures to balance tax burden on digital and “traditional” businesses, which, on the one hand, leads to increased dialogue at the OECD and EU level, and on the other – threatens to increase the fragmentation of the European market. The innovations aimed at taxing digital income, which are applied or discussed in Italy, France, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Slovakia, Austria, are analyzed. Recommendations are developed to take into account global and European trends in taxation of digital companies in Ukraine before and after the approval of relevant international initiatives.

Keywords:taxing the digital economy, tax evasion, tax avoidance, corporate income tax, permanent establishment, digital permanent establishment, digital services tax

JEL: H21, H25, H26, O32

Koshchuk T. . Ways to improve taxation for digital companies / T. . Koshchuk // Фінанси України. - 2019. - № 10. - C. 73-88.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 73 - 88)

Download

Downloads :296

1. OECD. (2019). Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy – Policy Note: OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/beps/policy-note-beps-inclusive-framework-addressing-tax-challenges-digitalisation.pdf.
2. OECD. (2017). Base erosion and profit shifting. Retrieved from fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44900.pdf.
3. OECD. (2018). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation: Interim Report. Retrieved from www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264293083-en.pdf?expires=1570875904&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=54F1FBD2BCCDCFD243DD5F11B80C67D8.
4. European Parliament. (21016). Tax Challenges in The Digital Economy. Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/579002/IPOL_STU%28
2016%29579002_EN.pdf.
5. EY. (2016). Digital disruption propels industry shifts and record annual value. Retrieved from www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-m-n-a-4q16-and-year-in-review-report/$FILE/EY-m-n-a-4q16-and-year-in-review-report.pdf.
6. EY. (2018). New digital tax policies: What, when, where, how and by whom? An excerpt from EY’s Global Tax Policy and Controversy Briefing. Retrieved from www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-new-digital-tax-policies-what-when-where-how-and-by-whom/$FILE/EY-new-digital-tax-policies-what-when-where-how-and-by-whom.pdf.
7. Hadzhieva, E. (2019). Impact of Digitalisation on International Tax Matters. Challenges and Remedies. Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/161104/ST%20Impact%20of%20Digitalisation%20publication.pdf.
8. Vyshnevskyi, V. P. (Ed.). (2018). The smart industry in the digital economy: perspectives, directions and mechanisms for development. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, Instytut ekonomiky promyslovosti. Retrieved from iie.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/
2018-Smart-promislovist-v-epohu-tsifrovoyi-ekonomiki.pdf [in Ukrainian].
9. Chekina, V. D. (2017). Smart industry and taxes: common ground. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 89–109 [in Ukrainian].
10. Simontacchi, S., Erede, B., & Scandone, F. S. (2019). Insight: The Italian Web Tax – Never Implemented and Already Outdated. Retrieved from news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-report-international/insight-the-italian-web-tax-never-implemented-and-already-outdated.
11. Michalak, J. (n. d.). OECD Multilateral Instrument (MLI). Retrieved from www.ey.com/en_gl/tax/oecd-multilateral-instrument-mli [in Ukrainian].
12. The EU will introduce a digital tax on its own if a global agreement is not reached in 2020. (2019, September 30). Business Information Network. Retrieved from bin.ua/news/foreign/world/240566-es-vvedet-cifrovoj-nalog-samostoyatelno-esli.html#.XZI7jwj7VQc.facebook [in Russian].
13. Taxation of the digital economy in Europe: new taxes and increased reporting. (2019, May 30). International Wealth. Retrieved from internationalwealth.info/tax-optimisation/
taxation-of-the-digital-economy-in-europe-new-taxes-and-increased-accountability/.
14. Bloomberg. (2018). Taxing Digital Companies: Challenges for Multinationals Amid Emerging Regulation: Bloomberg Tax Special Report. Retrieved from pro.bloombergtax.com/reports/digital-companies-challenges-multinationals-emerging-regulation/.
15. Olbert, M., Spengel, C. (2017). International Taxation in the Digital Economy: Challenge Accepted? World Tax Journal, February. Retrieved from www.ibfd.org/sites/ibfd.org/files/content/img/product/april_ppv_wtj_2017_01_int_4_international_taxation.pdf.
16. Valente, P. (2018, May 4). The Italian Web Tax from a National and International Perspective. Retrieved from static1.squarespace.com/static/55a50b8ee4b00f4e23b93618/
t/5b30c65388251b30912b77ea/1529923158712/2018_05_PV_The+Italian+Web+Tax+from+a+National+and+International+Perspective.pdf.
17. So-called “Youtube”/“Netflix” tax comes into effect in France. (2018, April 13). Lavocat. Retrieved from www.avocatl-en.com/single-post/2018/04/13/So-called-Youtube-Netflix-tax-comes-into-effect-in-France.
18. France Passes Controversial Tax for Tech Companies. (2019, August 11). The Verge. Retrieved from www.theverge.com/2019/7/11/20690253/france-digital-services-tax-google-facebook-tech-companies.
19. Jones, B., Seabrook, S., Sciliberto, S., & Jones, G. (2018). Taxation of the digital economy: unilateral measures. Tax Journal, March. Retrieved from www.eversheds-sutherland.com/documents/services/taxation/tax-digital-economy-020318.pdf.
20. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2016). Three steps forward, one step back? Reflections on "google taxes" and the destination-based corporate tax. Nordic Tax Journal, 2.
doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2016-0007.
21. New UK withholding tax on royalties. (2018, March 12). Ashurst. Retrieved from www.ashurst.com/en/news-and-insights/legal-updates/new-uk-withholding-tax-on-royalties/.
22. Ismer, R., Jescheck, C. (2017). The Substantive Scope of Tax Treaties in a Post-BEPS World: Article 2 OECD MC (Taxes Covered) and the Rise of New Taxes. Intertax, Vol. 45, No. 5. Retrieved from www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=TAXI2017030.
23. Taxation of digital business activities in Slovakia. (2018, May 31). accace.com. Retrieved from accace.com/taxation-of-digital-business-activities-in-slovakia-news-flash/.