№ 3/2020

Fìnansi Ukr. 2020 (3): 23–42https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.03.023

MONITORING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

LOVINSKA Ljudmyla ¹

¹Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5427-7185

Some aspects of companies’ sustainability reporting

Non-financial reporting of companies is an innovation of companies’ accounting and information systems. It is aimed to publicly show the company’s contribution towards the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Based on the study of international regulatory acts in the area of non-financial reporting, the article describes the main trends in its development at the global level – companies’ reporting on their contribution towards the attainment of SDG. The formation of approaches for companies’ non-financial reporting began in the form of voluntary public international initiatives; the second stage is the regulation of the implementation of non-financial reporting (EU regulations and directives, mandatory for application in EU member states); the third stage is the development of the Guidance on core indicators for entity reporting on contribution towards implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals by the Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Accounting Standards and Reporting standards (ISAR) under UNCTAD. Using the example of 12 foreign metallurgical companies, such qualitative characteristics of information disclosure in non-financial reporting of companies as to their contribution towards the attainment of sustainable development goals, as relevance and materiality, were investigated. It has been established that the non-financial reporting of selected companies does not sufficiently reflect the results of their activities in attaining SDGs. The average level of information disclosure in accordance with the GCI is only 48.48%. This fact gives a reason to draw the following conclusion: the reviewed reports are not relevant for assessment of the contribution of companies towards sustainable development. It is proved that the variety of types of non-financial reporting leads to decrease in its effectiveness in terms of performing the most important function - reflecting information on sustainable development; achievement of relevance of non-financial reporting is possible only on the basis of unification of its indicators and standardization of approaches to its compilation. The study, along with general scientific methods (induction, deduction, analysis and synthesis), also applied the methods of statistical sampling, comparison, expert estimates, associations and analogies

Keywords:Sustainable Development Goals, sustainable development reporting, non-financial reporting, qualitative characteristics, relevance, materiality

JEL: M41, M48, Q01

Lovinska L. . Some aspects of companies’ sustainability reporting / L. . Lovinska // Фінанси України. - 2020. - № 3. - C. 23-42.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 23 - 42)

Download

Downloads :147

1. Potapenko, V. H. (2013, July 8). State sustainable development policy on the basis of a green economy: an analytical note. Retrieved from www.niss.gov.ua/articles/1237/ [in Ukrainian].
2. United Nations. (2015, March 19). Technical report by the Bureau of the United Nations Statistical Commission (UNSC) on the process of the development of an indicator framework for the goals and targets of the post-2015 development agenda. Retrieved from sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6754Technical%20report%20of%20the%20UNSC%20Bureau%20(final).pdf.
3. Sustainability Disclosure Database. (n. d.). What is Sustainability Reporting? Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/SDG-12-6/about-sustainablility-reporting.
4. United Nations. (2011). Guiding Principles Reporting Framework on Business and Human Rights (UN Human Rights). Retrieved from www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf.
5. OECD (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
doi.org/10.1787/9789264115415-en
6. International Organization for Standardization. (2010). ISO 26000. Retrieved from www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html.
7. International Labour Organisation’s. (2017). Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (5th ed.). Retrieved from www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/---multi/documents/publication/wcms_094386.pdf.
8. Global Reporting Initiative. (n. d.). GRI Standards download Center. Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/?g=c38a63d2-
625c-4655-a6ab-d84d660fb109 (viewed at 27.02.2019).
9. European Parliament, & Council. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from=EN.
10. European Commission. (2019, June 20). Communication from the Comnission Guidelines on non-financial reporting: Supplement on reporting climate-related information (2019/C 209/01). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019XC0620%2801%2.
11. Iefymenko, T., & Lovinska, L. (2018). Entity’s reporting on the contribution towards the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals: Counteractions to information asymmetry. Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting (ISAR) (35th Session, October 24–26). Retrieved from unctad.org/meetings/en/Presentation/ciiisar35_25AM_TIefymenkoLLovinska_en.pdf.
12. UNCTAD. (2019). Guidance on core indicators for entity reporting on contributiontowards implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/diae2019d1_en.pdf.
13. United Nations. (n. d.). The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact. Retrieved from www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles.
14. Pizzi, S. (2018). The Relationship between Non-financial Reporting, Environmental Strategies and Financial Performance. Empirical Evidence from Milano Stock Exchange. Administrative Sciences, 8 (4).
doi.org/10.3390/admsci8040076
15. Carini, C., Rocca, L., Veneziani, M., & Teodori, C. (2018). Ex-Ante Impact Assessment of Sustainability Information – the Directive 2014/95/EU. Sustainability, 10 (2).
doi.org/10.3390/su10020560
16. Sierra-Garcia, L., Garcia-Benau, M. A., & Bollas-Araya, H. M. (2018). Empirical Analysis of Non-Financial Reporting by Spanish Companies. Administrative Sciences, 6 (3).
doi.org/10.3390/admsci8030029
17. IASB. (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, 13–15. Retrieved from app1.hkicpa.org.hk/hksaebk/HKSA_Members_Handbook_Master/volumeII/framework18.pdf.
18. Global Reporting Initiative. (n. d.). Sustainability Disclosure Database. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/search/.
19. ArcelorMittal – Belgium. (2016). Corporate Responsibility Report 2016. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/53855/.
20. PSV Holdings. (2017). Integrated Annual Report 2017. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/57396/.
21 Andulela Investment Holdings. (2017). Integrated Annual Report 2017. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/60857/.
22. Dialog Semiconductor. (2016). Always responsible – Sustainability report 2016. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/73754/.
23. Union Atlantic Minerals Limited. (2017). Integrated Report and Annual Financial Statements 2017. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/60794/.
24. Gränges. (2016). Annual Report 2016. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/56915/.
25. Tata Steel Integrated. (2017). Towards a Sustainable Future. Integrated Report & Annual Accounts 2016-17. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/
51599/.
26. Doe Run Company. (2016). 2016 Sustainability Report. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/55157/.
27. AMAG Austria Metall. (2016). ALU Report 2016. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/69651/.
28. Constellium. (2016). Business and sustainability performance report 2016. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/57119/.
29. OutoKumpu. (2016). Sustainability Review 2016. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/50551/.
30. Inscape Corporation. (2017). Sustainability Report 2017. Retrieved from database.globalreporting.org/reports/52486/.