№ 8/2020

Fìnansi Ukr. 2020 (8): 57–71https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.08.057

ACCOUNTING AND AUDIT

LEVITSKA Svitlana ¹, OSADCHA Olga ²

¹National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7803-5586
² National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-3281

Economic benefit assessment of assets for socially responsible business

Modern market development concepts which determine the need for a comprehensive assessment of business performance through social security impact on the environmental safety programs implementation at the enterprise level (as well as at the regional and national levels) are generalized. Alternative forms of economic benefits from using production resources in the context of balanced business policy context are studied. The financial results determining practice, based on analytical accounting of economic benefit elements assessment by international entities, taking into account their impact on economic development, social protection and environmental security are revealed. Alternative criteria of economic benefits, that are the conceptual income and expenses basis, as well as features of financial results based on analytical accounting of economic benefit elements (taking into account their impact on economic development, social protection and environmental security) are substantiated. Оbjectives of the article are: generalization of factors influencing the formation of economic benefits of enterprises’ assets, taking into account the requirements for socio-economic and environmental balance of business; justification of both methodological and organizational approaches and variable forms of economic benefit identification, its evaluation, accounting and analytical support. Criteria for assessing socio-economic benefit, social effect are specified. Methodical and practical approaches to economic benefit classification as an object of both accounting and management are proposed, such as potential of utility of future economic and implemented economic benefit. The international Managerial Accounting practice, analytical level of which identifies economic benefits depending on the period of its receipt is generalized. The use of the above economic benefit classification will improve accounting and analytical information reliability for managers to make effective operational and strategic decisions

Keywords:economic benefit, assets, enterprise, socially responsible business, potential of utility, integrated accounting system

JEL: М40

Levitska S. . Economic benefit assessment of assets for socially responsible business / S. Levitska, O. Osadcha // Фінанси України. - 2020. - № 8. - C. 57-71.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 57 - 71)

Download

Downloads :124

1. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1991). About entrepreneurship (Law No. 698-XII, February 7). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/698-12#Text[in Ukrainian].
2. Anderson, A. R. (2015). Conceptualising Entrepreneurship as Economic “Explanation” and the Consequent Loss of “Understanding”. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 14 (2), 145–157. doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2015.067432
3. Angulo-Guerrero, M. J., Pérez-Moreno, S., & Abad-Guerrero, I. M. (2017). How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. Journal of Business Research, 73(C), 30–37. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.017
4. Apostoliuk, P. O. (2012). Industrial ecology. Kyiv: Znannia [in Ukrainian].
5. Sustainability. (n. d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved from uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA [in Ukrainian].
6. Levytska, S., & Osadcha, O. (2016). Sustainable regional economics as a result of administrative-territorial reform in Ukraine: accounting and managerial approaches. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences, 3 (1), 200–206. Retrieved from cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.ceon.element-0ccc82b0-fdba-35f9-9d27-43c3d5439ee2.
7. Aquino, R. S., Lück, M., & Schänzel, H. A. (2018). A conceptual framework of tourism social entrepreneurship for sustainable community development. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 37, 23–32. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.09.001
8. Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 313–325. doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4
9. Zahra, Sh. A., & Wright, M. (2016). Understanding the Social Role of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 53 (4), 610–629. doi.org/10.1111/joms.12149
10. Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M., & Yasyshena, V. (2019). Intangible Assets as an Accounting and Management Object. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 132–142. doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-10
11. Kostiakova, A. A. (2019). Strategic management accounting: essence and concept. Black sea economic studies, 39 (2), 99–102. Retrieved from www.bses.in.ua/journals/2019/39_2_2019/
21.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. Ukrainska, L. O. (2018). Human capital of corporation: modern peculiarities of formation. Economic Theory and Law, 2 (33), 42–50 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.31359/2411-5584-2018-33-2-42
13. Fomina, O. V. (2016). Management accounting in trade. Kyiv: KNEU. Retrieved from knute.edu.ua/file/MjExMzA=/624a6d7d9a739851810eef1d42fb84ce.pdf.
14. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2013). National Accounting Regulation (Standard) 1 “General Financial Reporting Requirements” (Order No. 73, February 7). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0336-13 [in Ukrainian].
15. National Commission on Securities and Stock Market. (2013). Annex 38 to the Regulation on Disclosure of Information by Issuers of Securities (Decision No. 2180/24712, December 3). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z2180-13 [in Ukrainian].
16. IAS Intangible Assets. (2019, February 25). Retrieved from zakon.help/article/msbo-38-nematerialni-aktivi-msbo-38-nematerialni [in Ukrainian].
17. Interpretation IFRIC 14 – IAS 19, Restrictions on Fixed Assets, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction. (2019, February 25). Retrieved from zakon.help/article/tlumachennya-ktmfz-14-msbo-19-obmezhennya-na-aktivi-za [in Ukrainian].
18. IPSASB. (2019, January). IPSAS 42 Summary – Social Benefits. Retrieved from www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IPSAS-42-Social-Benefits-At-a-Glance.pdf.
19. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2010). National Regulation (Standard) of Public Sector Accounting 121 “Fixed Assets” (Order No. 1202, October 12).. Retrieved from zakon.radagov.ua/laws/show/z1017-10#Text [in Ukrainian].
20. Bivens, J. (2019, January 30). The economic costs and benefits of Airbnb (Report). Retrieved from www.epi.org/publication/the-economic-costs-and-benefits-of-airbnb-no-reason-for-local-policymakers-to-let-airbnb-bypass-tax-or-regulatory-obligations.
21. Coman, D. M., Coman, M. D., & Boca (Rakos), I. F. (2012). Managerial accounting – a source of information for an efficient management in SME. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 521–525. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.085
22. Neil’s Brock Copenhagen Business College (2008). Copenhagen K, Denmark.
23. Levytska, S. O., & Osadcha, O. O. (2013). Economic benefit as an estimate of income in accounting: methodological and organizational approaches to recognition. Accounting and Auditing, 5, 20–28 [in Ukrainian].
24. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (1999). Regulation (standard) of accounting 15 "Income" (Order No. 290, November 29). Retrieved from zakon.help/law/z0860-99 [in Ukrainian].
25. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2010). Tax Code of Ukraine (Law No. 2755-VI, December 2). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17#Text [in Ukrainian].
26. IPSAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”. (2000, May). Retrieved from buhgalter911.com/public/uploads/normativka/Standart_gossektor/%D0%9C%D0%A1%D0
%91%D0%9E%D0%94%D0%A1/%D0%9C%D0%A1%D0%91%D0%9E%D0%94%D0%A1_1.pdf [in Ukrainian].
27. Alekseienko, L. M., & Olekseienko, V. M. (2003). Economic explanatory dictionary: property, privatization, securities market (Ukrainian-English-Russian). Ternopil: Aston [in Ukrainian].
28. Mochernyi, S. V. (2000). Economic encyclopedia (in 3 Vols), 1. Kyiv: Academy [in Ukrainian].
29. Nashkerska, H. V. (2004). Accounting. Kyiv: TSUL [in Ukrainian].
30. Prymak, T. O. (2008). Business Economics (5th Ed.). Kyiv: Vikar [in Ukrainian].