Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 10/2020

№ 10/2020

Fìnansi Ukr. 2020 (10): 7–23
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.10.007

FINANCIAL GLOBALIZATION

BILORUS Oleh 1, VLASOV Volodymyr 2, GASANOV Sergіi 3, KHANIN Igor 4

1Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-5649
2National Scientific Agricultural Library of the UAAS
3SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-0419
4National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4221-2314


The end of the globalization erа, deglobalization, “new” globalization, or transition to noospheric co-development? (part 2)


The article highlights the controversial issues of the state, contradictions and trends of modern globalization in the face of new challenges and threats associated with political, immigration, pandemic, climate, economic and trade shocks – Britain’s exit from the EU, the implementation of the US President’s policy “America Above All”, the beginning of trade de-globalization as a result of the revision of free trade agreements (FTAs) and the trade “war” between the United States and China, the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic and climate change on deepening the global economic recession, the collapse of national economies and international trade, lack of financial resources for active government support of the health care systems, social protection, small and medium-sized businesses. Political, economic, managerial and academic circles are actively discussing the problems of the “end” of globalization, de-globalization, “new” globalization, the need for a “new world order”, which will actually embody the fundamental values ??of democracy, economic freedom, free trade and, at the same time, will strengthen social responsibility of the world community and its international institutions, the main geopolitical, geo-economic and military centers of power (primarily the United States, China, the European Union, Russia, etc.) for the preservation of peace on the basis of consensus, recognition of global priorities in countering climatic and epidemic threats to human life on Earth , consistent implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals to eradicate poverty in all its forms and manifestations, combat inequality within and between countries, ensure continuous, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and promote social inclusion. The article drew attention to the strengthening of the trends of protectionism and economic nationalism, in particular, the US withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement and attempts to revise the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The article shows the loss of the US leadership in world trade due to the accelerated economic development of other countries, primarily the Asian region. The discussion of these problems at the Davos Economic Forum led to the conclusion about the likely end of Atlanticism and globalization. At the same time, the UN report (2018) highlighted a special section on trade hyperglobalization. The article hypothesizes that the Bali Round (2013) of negotiations on trade began the fourth wave of its globalization, and proposes a new theory of international trade – the theory of globalization impact.

Keywords:globalization, de-globalization, national interests, redistribution of world resources, interstate trade conflicts, economic recession, economic and social dimensions of the global crisis

JEL: F02, F15, F18, F63, G01, O19


Bilorus O. . The end of the globalization erа, deglobalization, “new” globalization, or transition to noospheric co-development? (part 2) / O. . Bilorus, V. Vlasov, S. . Gasanov, I. Khanin // Фінанси України. - 2020. - № 10. - C. 7-23.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 23) DownloadDownloads :168
1. Camdessus, M. (1999). Orderly Liberalization, Not Deglobalization. New Perspectives Quarterly, 16 (1), 37–38. DOI: 10.1111/0893-7850.2011999201.
2. Gilpin, R. (2000). The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691186474.
3. Germain, R. D. (Ed.). (2000). Globalization and its Critics: Perspectives from Political Economy. London: Macmillan Press, Ltd.: St. Martin’s Press, Inc. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-07588-8.
4. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its Discontents. New York: London: W.W. Norton & Company.
5. Stiglitz, J. E. (2017). Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited: Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump. New York: London: W.W. Norton & Company.
6. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: London: W.W. Norton & Company.
7. Stiglitz J. E. (2015). The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. New York: London: W.W. Norton & Company.
8. Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. New York: London: W.W. Norton & Company.
9. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, Mass.: London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
10. Piketty, T. (2015). The Economics of Inequality. Cambridge, Mass.: London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
11. Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: London: W.W. Norton & Company.
12. Robinson, W. (2008). Latin America and Global Capitalism: A Critical Globalization Perspective. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Beck, W. (2000). Risk Society. On the way to another modernity. Moscow: Progress-Tradition [in Russian].
14. Beck, W. (2001). What is Globalization? The mistakes of globalism - answers to globalization. Moscow: Progress-Tradition [in Russian].
15. Beck, W. (2007). Power and its Opponents in the Era of Globalism: New World Political Economy. Moscow: Progress-Tradition [in Russian].
16. Bello, W. (2004). Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy. London: Zed Books.
17. Bello, W. (2013). Capitalism’s Last Stand? Deglobalization in the Age of Austerity. London: New York: Zed Books. DOI: doi.org/10.5040/9781350218895.
18. Van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2010). On the Brink of Deglobalization: An Alternative Perspective on the Causes of the World Trade Collapse. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781849805803.
19. Van, Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2019). Deglobalization 2.0: Trade and Openness During the Great Depression and the Great Recession. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781788973465.
20. Herrero, A. G. (2020, February 3). From Globalization to Deglobalization: Zooming Into Trade. Bruegel. Retrieved from www.bruegel.org/2020/02/from-globalization-to-deglobalization-zooming-into-trade/.
21. Bank for International Settlements. (2018, December). Globalisation and deglobalisation. BIS Papers, 100. December. Retrieved from www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap100.htm.
22. Babones, S. J. (2012). Deglobalization. In Ritzer, G. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization First, 384–385. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: 10.1002/9780470670590.
23. Braudel, F. (1992). Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century I: The Structure of Everyday Life: The Limits of the Possible. Berkeley: Los Angeles: University of California Press.
24. Braudel, F. (1992). Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century II: The Wheels of Commerce. Berkeley: Los Angeles: University of California Press.
25. Braudel, F. (1992). Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century III: The Perspective of the World. Berkeley: Los Angeles: University of California Press.
26. Wallerstein, I. (2011). The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Berkeley: Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520948570.
27. Wallerstein, I. (2011). The Modern World-System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750. Berkeley: Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/
9780520948587.
28. Wallerstein, I. (2011). The Modern World-System III: The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730s–1840s. Berkeley: Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/
9780520948594.
29. Wallerstein, I. (2011). The Modern World-System IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914. Berkeley: Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520948600.
30. Amin, S., Arrighi, G., Frank, A. G., & Wallerstein, I. (1982). Dynamics of Global Crisis. Monthly Review Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-16853-8.
31. Arrighi, G. (2009). The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Time. London: New York: Verso.
32. Arrighi, G. (2007). Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. London: New York: Verso.
33. Maddison, A. (1982). Phases of Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Maddison, A. (1995). Explaining the economic performance of nations: essays in time and space. Aidershot: Edward Elgar.
35. Maddison, A. (2007). Contours of the World Economy 1-2030 AD: Essays in Macro-Economic History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Maddison, A. (2006). The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective/Historical Statistics. Paris: Development Centre Studies. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264022621-en.
37. O’Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (1999). Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: London: The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/3310.001.0001.
38. Keynes, J. M. (1933). National Self-Sufficiency. Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, 22 (86), 177–193. DOI: 10.2307/30094997.
39. Bator, F. M. (1958). The Anatomy of Market Failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72 (3), 351–379. DOI: 10.2307/1882231.
40. Cowen, T. (1999). Public Goods and Market Failures: A Critical Examinations. New Brunswick: London: Transaction Publishers.
41. Williamson, J. G. (2005). Winners and Losers over Two Centuries of Globalization. Wider Perspectives on Global Development. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230501850_6.
42. Vision Europe Summit. (2018). Winners and losers of globalization (Collegio Carlo Alberto. Torino, 14-15 November 2017). Retrieved from institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ves-publications-2017.pdf.
43. Hornok, C., & Koren, M. (2017). Winners and Losers of Globalization: Sixteen Challenges for Measurement and Theory. Economics without Borders: Economic Research for European Policy Challenges, 238–273. DOI: 10.1017/9781316636404.008.
44. Lamp, N. (2019). How Should We Think about the Winners and Losers from Globalization? Three Narratives and their Implications for the Redesign of International Economic Agreements. European Journal of International Law, 30 (4), 1359–1397. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chz067.
45. OECD. (2014). Development Co-operation Report 2014: Mobilising Resources for Sustainable Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/dcr-2014-en.
46. Trans-Pacific Partnership (Full Text) (n. d.). Retrieved from ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-full-text.
47. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (n. d.). Retrieved from www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/nafta-alena/fta-ale/index.aspx?
lang=eng.
48. World Economic Forum (2017, 17–20 January). World Economic Forum Annual Meeting (Davos-Klosters, Switzerland). Retrieved from www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2017.
49. World Economic Forum (2020, January 21–24). World Economic Forum Annual Meeting (Davos-Klosters, Switzerland). Retrieved from www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2020.
50. Frankel, J., Stein, E., & Wei, S. (1997). Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
51. World Trade Organization. (2018). World Trade Report 2018. The future of world trade: How digital technologies are transforming global commerce. Retrieved from www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/world_trade_report18_e.pdf.
52. United Nations. (2018). Trade and Investment Report 2018: Power, Platforms and the free trade delusion. New York: Geneva.
53. Vlasov, V. I. (2008). Globalization influence is a strategic basis for the development of international trade. Economy of Ukraine, 4, 63–72 [in Ukrainian].