Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 10/2020

№ 10/2020

Fìnansi Ukr. 2020 (10): 112–126
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.10.112

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSIONS

OSTROVETSKY Vitalii 1

1Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-5236


Prospects for development of environmental taxation in Ukraine


The development of technologies entails the deterioration of both the global environmental situation and at the regional level. The solution of environmental issues is directly related to the use of natural resources, as well as the utilization of the economic system, including through the transformation of waste into raw materials for energy production, various materials, reduction of toxic emissions into the air, water, biodiversity, etc. The main economic instruments of environmental protection and improvement of the ecological situation, which are used in world practice for these purposes, are analyzed. Among them are special taxes, pledge-refundable schemes and expanded business responsibility. The analysis of economic instruments of state regulation of nature management and sources of funding for environmental measures in Ukraine suggests that it needs to be revised and systematized with a scientifically sound definition of the parameters of mandatory payments in favour of the state and the proportions of natural distribution resource payments between the parts of the budget system to prevent the scattering of financial resources and their targeted use to finance environmental protection programs and improve the environmental situation in Ukraine. The expediency of strengthening the integration of such payments into the structure of existing taxes on goods (excise tax on gasoline), while maintaining environmental incentives, in particular, coordination with the taxation of corporate profits, for example, in the form of a reduction factor in the case of their include cost. In this case, the environmental component of taxation should correspond to the scale of environmental damage and is the basis of the mechanism for calculating tax payments or other economic incentives. This can be ensured by deepening the differentiation of tax rates depending on the damage to the environment, as well as the conditions of use of natural resources, the availability of certification of nature management enterprises according to ISO 14000 standard.

Keywords:nature management, environmental protection, environment, rent payments, excise tax, environmental tax

JEL: Q5, E62


OSTROVETSKY V. . Prospects for development of environmental taxation in Ukraine / V. . OSTROVETSKY // Фінанси України. - 2020. - № 10. - C. 112-126.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 112 - 126) DownloadDownloads :128
1. UN. (2020). Debt and COVID-19: A Global Response in Solidarity. Retrieved from www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/russian_debt_and_covid.pdf [in Russian].
2. Baumol, U. (1965). Economic theory and operations research. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
3. Vollebergh, H. (2012). Environmental taxes and green growth: Exploring possibilities within energy and climate policy. The Hague.
4. Kaffine, D., & O’Reilly, P. (2013, May 24). What Have We Learned About Extended Producer Responsibility in the Past Decade? A Survey of the Recent EPR Economic Literature.
5. Pigou, A. (1985). Economic Theory of Welfare. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
6. Pierce, D. W. (2002). Economics of the Environment. Greenaway D., Blini M., & Stewart I. (Eds.). Panorama of economic thought at the end of the 20th century (in 2 Vols). St. Petersburg: School of Economics [in Russian].
7. Smith, A. (1935). Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of peoples (in 2 Vols). Moscow: Leningrad: Gossotsekgiz [in Russian].
8. Fullerton, D., Leicester, & A., Smith, S. (2010). Environmental Taxes. Dimensions of Tax Design: the Mirrlees Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from www.ifs.org.uk/mirrleesreview/dimensions/ch5.pdf.
9. Hill, J., Hislop, H., & Bégin, A.-E. (2008, February). Good product, bad product? Making the case for product levies. Green Alliance.
10. Hogg, D., Andersen, M. S., Elliott, T., Sherrington, C., Vergunst, T., Ettlinger, S. et al. (2014). Study on Environmental Fiscal Reform Potential in 12 EU Member States (Final Report to DG Environment of the European Commission, Eunomia Research and Consulting and Aarhus University). Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/green_semester/pdf/EFR-Final%20Report.pdf.
11. Bublyk, M., & Bei, M. (2016). Features of "Green" economics and its basic tools of transformation in social-oriented system. Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Economics and Management Issues, 847, 29–34 [in Ukrainian].
12. Veklych, O. O., Kobzar, O. M., Kolmakova, V. M., & Patoka, I. M. (2019). Ecosystem principles of estimating losses from environmental pollution. Kyiv: SI IEPSR NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
13. Lupenko, Yu. O. (2017). State and prospects of sustainable rural development. The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex, 6, 7–10 [in Ukrainian].
14. Liashenko, O., & Khrushch, L. (2018). Determination of the environmental tax on the basis of modified input-output Leontief-Ford model. Technology audit and production reserve, 3 (4), 41–46 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.133309
15. Marynenko, N. Yu. (2018). Revenues from environmental taxes: the European dimension. Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference "Formation of a mechanism for strengthening the competitive position of national economic systems in the global, regional and local dimensions" and the I International Student Scientific Forum "Creative Economy through the eyes of youth", 1, 67–69. Ternopil: FOP Palyanytsya V. A. [in Ukrainian].
16. Metelenko, N., & Popova, A. (2014). Problems of administration of resource payments and technical and technological support of environmental taxpayers in industry. State and regions. Series: Economics and Business, 4 (79), 34–39 [in Ukrainian].
17. Khvesyk, M. A. (Ed.). (2019). Integrated management of water resources of Ukraine. Kyiv: SI IEPR NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
18. Breyer, P., & Cohen, C. (2020, November 19). It's time to innovate in sovereign debt restructuring. Retrieved from www.imf.org/ru/News/Articles/2020/11/19/blog-time-is-ripe-for-innovation-in-the-world-of-sovereign-debt-restructuring. [in Russian].
19. UNCTAD. (2020). World Investment Report 2020. Retrieved from unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2020_overview_ru.pdf. [in Russian]
20. IOM UN Migration. (2020). World Migration Report. Retrieved from www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/wmr_2020.pdf.
21. IMF. (2020). World Economic Outlook. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2020/October.
22. World Bank. (n. d.). GDP per capita (current US$). Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD.
23. EPI. (2020). The Environmental Performance Index 2020. Retrieved from nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/ecology.
24. WHO. (n. d.). Ranking of countries in terms of mortality from environmental problems. Retrieved from nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/mortality-rate-pollution. [in Russian].
25. Burck, J., Hagen, U., Höhne, N., Nascimento, L., & Bals, C. (2019). Climate Change Performance Index 2020. Retrieved from nonews.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ccpi2020.pdf.
26. EPI. (n. d.). Environmental Performance Index 2020. Global metrics for the environment: Ranking country performance on sustainability issues. Retrieved from nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/air-quality.
27. EaP Green. (2016). Assessing a Green Economy Transformation: A Guide for EU Eastern Partnership Countries. Paris. Retrieved from www.green-economies-eap.org/ru/resources/EaP%20GREEN_GGI%20Guide_clean_RUS_Final.pdf [in Russian].
28. Ukraine, & EU. (2014, June 27). Association Agreement between Ukraine, of the one part, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the other part. Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/ua/diyalnist/yevropejska-integraciya/ugoda-pro-asociacyu [in Ukrainian].
29. President of Ukraine. (2020). On the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine of September 14, 2020 "On the National Security Strategy of Ukraine" (Decree No. 392/2020, September 14). Retrieved from www.president.gov.ua/documents/3922020-35037/ [in Ukrainian].
30. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2016). On the ratification of the Paris Agreement (Law No. 1469-VIII, July 14). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1469-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
31. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2019). About the Basic principles (strategy) of the state ecological policy of Ukraine for the period till 2030 (Law No. 2697-VIII, February 28). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
32. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1991). On environmental protection (Law No. 1264-XII, June 25). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1264-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
33. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2020). Some issues of crediting part of the excise tax on fuel produced in Ukraine and imported into the customs territory of Ukraine to the general fund of local government budgets in 2020 (Decree No. 73, February 12). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/73-2020-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
34. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2010). Tax Code of Ukraine (Law No. 2755-VI, December 2). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17 [in Ukrainian].