№ 1/2018

Fìnansi Ukr. 2018 (1): 7–30https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.01.007

СHANGE MANAGEMENT IN THE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC FINANCE

IEFYMENKO Tetiana ¹

¹SESE “Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-3959

Monetary tools of the state economic security

The article studies opportunities for strengthening the protection of national interests from inner and outer threats of monetary-credit and currency destabilization. Theoretical and practical approaches to the formation of the structure of the criteria, which in the conditions of uncertainty cannot always adequately represent the features of the security level of social economic system, were analyzed. It was found, that as the result of much research of separate economic processes and phenomena, the conclusions on the necessity of changes in the regulatory procedures of different measurements of economic activity depend on space and time agreement as well as interaction of conjunctural criteria of global and national character. That is especially topical for the designing of recommendations as to the level of influence of different kinds of situations on the state of economic security, because with confusing interpretation of reality, the scenarios suggested, limitations introduced as well as practical measures may lead to undesirable consequences. The author emphasizes the practicality of the quantitative evaluation of the complex economic security according to the threshold value of the aggregate of indicators in finance and non-finance expression. For identification of threats and their consequences, for timely counteraction, institutional aspects of state management should be changed. In modern economic space, which is based on network connections and communications, monetary regulatory tools should be aimed through the controlled channels of monetary-credit transmission at the fulfillment of the target of inflation as well as other coordinated goals. The selection of monetary tools in qualitative and quantitative aspects, which are connected to the features of operational procedures on money proposal should be harmonized according to provisions of agreements with international financial organizations, supranational standard norms, taking into account those that are important, structural, institutional, territorial and the such factors of influence on the real and other sectors of economy, on the expectations and economic behavior of economic agents and individuals. It was proved that the provision of economic security of the state and the society should be studied in the framework of resilience as both the whole financial system of the state and its separate units.

Keywords:monetary tools, monetary-credit and currency regulation areas, sustainable economic growth, economic security, behavior, expectations of economy agents, national interests

JEL: Е52, Н56, О42, О43

Iefymenko T. . Monetary tools of the state economic security / T. . Iefymenko // Фінанси України. - 2018. - № 1. - C. 7-30.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 30)

Download

Downloads :1218

1. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2003). On the Fundamentals of National Security of Ukraine (Act No. 964-IV, June 19). Retrieved from zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/964-15/print [in Ukrainian].

2. Forbes, K., Reinhardt, D. & Wieladek, T. (2017). The spillovers, interactions, and (un)intended consequences of monetary and regulatory policies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 85, 1–22.
doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.10.008

3. Coibiona, O., Gorodnichenko, Yu., Kueng, L. & Silvia, J. (2017). Innocent Bystanders? Monetary policy and inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 88, 70–89.
doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.05.005

4. Boivin, J., Giannoni, M. P. (2009). Global Forces and Monetary Policy Effectiveness. In J. Galí, M. Gertler (Eds.). International Dimensions of Monetary Policy (pp. 429–478). National Bureau of Economic Research.

5. Levin, A. T., Wieland, V. & Williams, J. (1998). Robustness of Simple Monetary Policy Rules under Model Uncertainty.

6. Browning, P. (1983). Economic Images: Current Economic Controversies. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

7. Keynes, J. M. (2011). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, And Money. Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.

8. Campbell, C. D., Campbell, R. G. & Dolan, E. G. (1988). Money, banking, and monetary policy. Chicago Dryden Press.

9. Friedman, M. (1999). If money started talking. Moscow: Delo [in Russian].

10. Lukas, R. E., Jr. (1972). Expectations and the Neutrality of Money. Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 103–124.
doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1

11. Lucas, R. E., Jr., Stokey, N. (1987). Money and Interest in a Cash-in-Advance Economy. Econometrica, 55(3), 491–514.
doi.org/10.2307/1913597

12. Sargent, T. J., Wallace, N. (1975). "Rational" Expectations, the Optimal Monetary Instrument, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule. Journal of Political Economy, 83(2), 241–254.
doi.org/10.1086/260321

13. Mann, S. R. (1992). Chaos Theory in Strategic Thought. Parameters (US Army War College Quarterly), Vol. XXII, 54–68.

14. Mann, S. R. (1998). The Reaction to Chaos. In D. S. Alberts, T. J. Czerwinski (Eds.). Complexity, Global Politics, and National Security. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University.

15. Kiel, D. L., Elliott, E. W. (Eds.). (1997). Theory of Chaos in the Social Sciences: Fundamentals and Applications. The University of Michigan Press.

16. Stonier, T. (1983). The wealth of information: A profile of the post-industrial economy. Thames Methuen.

17. Yurchy'shy'n, V. (Ed.). (2017). Challenges and risks of deployment of crisis processes in Ukraine and directions of economic policy of their prevention. Ky'yiv: Zapovit [in Ukrainian].

18. International Monetary Fund. (2006). Financial Soundness Indicators. Compilation Guide.

19. European Commission. (2009). Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0138&from=EN.

20. BIS. (2017, December). Basel III revisions. Retrieved from www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d424.htm.

21. IFRS. (n. d.). International Financial Reporting Standards 9 "Financial Instruments". Retrieved from zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_016 [in Ukrainian]; IFRS. (n. d.). IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments". Retrieved from eifrs.ifrs.org/eifrs/PdfAlone?id=17298&sidebarOption=UnaccompaniedIfrs.

22. National Bank of Ukraine. (2015). Comprehensive program of development of the financial sector of Ukraine till 2020 (Decision No. 391, June 18).

23. Justine, G.-W., Williams, B. M. (2004). Trading Chaos: Maximize Profits with Proven Technical Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Publishers.

24. Williams, B. M. (1998). New Trading Dimensions: How to Profit from Chaos in Stocks, Bonds, and Commodities. Wiley.

25. Peters, E. E. (1994). Fractal Market Analysis: Applying Chaos Theory to Investment and Economics. Wiley.

26. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1999). About National Bank of Ukraine (Act No. 679-XIV, May 20). Retrieved from zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/679-14 [in Ukrainian].

27. National Bank of Ukraine. (2017). The main principles of monetary policy for 2018 and the medium-term perspective (Decision No. 37-pd, September 12) [in Ukrainian].

28. Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Univoffflinois Press.

29. Wiener, N. (1965). Cybernetics or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. The MIT Press.

30. Guthrie, G., Wright, J. & Yu, J. (1999). Testing the expectations theory of the term structure for New Zealand. New Zealand Economic Paper, Vol. 33, No. 1, 93–114.
doi.org/10.1080/00779959909544299

31.. Bernanke, B. S. (2004). Speech, December. The logic of monetary policy, Vol.

27. . Modigliani, F., Brumberg, R. (1954). Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data. In Post Keynesian economics. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

33. Ando, A., Modigliani, F. (1963). The "life cycle" hypothesis of saving: Aggregate implications and tests. The American economic review, Vol. 53, No. 1, 55–84.

34. Modigliani, F. (1971). Monetary policy and consumption. Consumer spending and monetary policy: the linkages, 5, 9–84.

35. Walsh, C. E. (2010). Monetary Theory and Policy (3d ed.). Cambridge; Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

36. International Monetary Fund. (2017, April). Ukraine: 2016 ARTICLE IV Consultation and third review under the extended arrangement, requests for a waiver of non-observance of a performance criterion, waiver of applicability, rephasing of access and financing assurances review. IMF Country Report No. 17/83. Retrieved from www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/CR/2017/cr1783.ashx.

37. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n. d.). Gross domestic product by category of end-use. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2005/vvp/vvp_ric/vvpzkkv_u.htm [in Ukrainian].

38. National Bank of Ukraine. (n. d.). Loans granted to non-financial corporations, broken down by maturity. Retrieved from bank.gov.ua/files/3.3-Loans.xls [in Ukrainian].

39. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n. d.) Economic statistics / Foreign economic activity. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/menu/menu_u/zed.htm [in Ukrainian].