Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 3/2018

№ 3/2018

Fìnansi Ukr. 2018 (3): 116–128

FINANCES OF THE INSTITUTIONAL SECTORS

MYSAKA Ganna 1, DERUN Ivan 2

1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
2Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv


Determination and evaluation of indicators of company investment attractiveness based on financial statements


The article deals with the systematization of approaches to determining company parameters in terms of its investment attractiveness. The critical analysis of those approaches allows identifying the reasons that hinder a company’s evaluation based on its financial statements indicators. The purpose of the article is to provide a theoretical reasoning, development and testing of the evaluation model of company investment attractiveness using its financial statements data, which is necessary for the stakeholders to make management decisions. The research embraces methods of accounting, econometrics and financial analysis. The authors point out that the level of a company’s market capitalization, including its net assets (or equity), internally generated goodwill and market expectations regarding the prospects of securities attractiveness, is the most objective company indicator in terms of its investment attractiveness. That is why the authors opts to estimate investment attractiveness by Tobin’s Q ratio, which takes into account both the company’s market capitalization and the book value of its net assets. The proposed econometric model, evaluating investment attractiveness, encompasses the following factors: the equity-to-debt ratio, the return on net intangible assets, the share of goodwill in intangible assets, the share of R&D costs in operating expenses and the return on equity. Financial statements data of 44 transnational corporations for 2012-2016 is used for the model affirmation. In the conclusion based on the obtained results, the authors prove that a company’s investment attractiveness is most sensitive to the changes in the level of funding for research and development, which is an integral part of its internally generated goodwill and business reputation.

Keywords:R&D costs, internally generated goodwill, business reputation, investment attractiveness of a company, Tobin’s Q ratio, market capitalization, financial statements

JEL: G32, M21, M41


Mysaka G. . Determination and evaluation of indicators of company investment attractiveness based on financial statements / G. Mysaka, I. Derun // Фінанси України. - 2018. - № 3. - C. 116-128.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 116 - 128) DownloadDownloads :216
1. Goncharuk, A. G., Karavan, S. (2013). The investment attractiveness evaluation: methods and measurement features. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 7, 160–166.
2. Jantoń-Drozdowska, E., Majewska, M. (2016). Investment attractiveness of Central and Eastern European countries in the light of new locational advantages development. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 11 (1), 97–119. dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2016.005.
3. Radomska, J., Sołoducho-Pelc, L. (2015). Business strategy in innovative and non-innovative companies of various sizes. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 10 (2), 100–109. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.526.
4. Rolik, Y. А. (2013). A complex approach to evaluating the innovation strategy of a company to determine its investment attractiveness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 562–571. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.526.
5. Nosova, O. V. (2007). Investment attractiveness of the company. Strategic Priorities, 1 (2), 120–126 [in Ukrainian].
6. Lewellen, W. G., Badrinath, S. G. (1997). On the measurement of Tobin’s q. Journal of financial economics, 44 (1), 77–122. doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00013-X.
7. Tvede, L. (2002). The psychology of finance: understanding the behavioral dynamics of markets. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Deloitte. (2010). Conceptual Framework of Financial Reporting. Retrieved from: www.iasplus.com/en/standards/other/framework.
9. IAS
38. Intangible Assets. (2010, March 24). Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/docs/consolidated/ias38_en.pdf.
10. Shhy`rba, M. (2010). Importance of information in the financial reporting and its influence on the economic decisions of users. Economic Analysis, 7, 403–406 [in Ukrainian].
11. Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley.
12. Kozhan, R. (2009). Financial econometrics with EViews. Copenhagen: Roman Kozhan & Ventus Publishing Aps.
13. My`saka, H. V. (2009). Financial reporting issuers in the information services of the securities market participants. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 109, 29–32 [in Ukrainian].
14. Cassell, C. A., Myers, L. A., & Seidel, T. A. (2015). Disclosure transparency about activity in valuation allowance and reserve accounts and accruals-based earnings management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 46, 23–38. doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.03.004.
15. Tucker, J. W. (2015). The relation between disclosure quality and reporting quality: A discussion of Cassell, Myers, and Seidel. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 46, 39–43. doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.05.002.
16. Zhuk, V. M. (2009). Institutional accounting theory in scientific support of socio-economic development. Ky`yiv: National Scientific Centre “Insitute of Agrarian Economics” [in Ukrainian].
17. Libby, R., Rennekamp, K. M., & Seybert, N. (2015). Regulation and the interdependent roles of managers, auditors, and directors in earnings management and accounting choice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 25–42. doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.09.003.
18. Beurden, P., Gossling, T. (2008). Review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407–424. doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x.
19. Luo, X., Wang, H., Raithel, S., & Zheng, Q. (2015). Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management Journal, 36 (1), 123–136. doi.org/10.1002/smj.2219.
20. Sierra-Garcial, L., Zorio-Grima, A., & Garcia-Benau, M. (2015). Stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility Environment Management, 22 (5), 286–304.
21. Boyko, K., & Derun, I. (2016). Disclosure of non-financial information in corporate social reporting as a strategy for improving management effectiveness. Journal of International Studies, 9 (3), 159–177. doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-3/13.
22. Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., & Krzus, M. P. (2011). Market interest in nonfinancial information. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23 (4), 113–1
27. doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2011.00357.