|
№ 4/2016№ 4/2016 | Fìnansi Ukr. 2016 (4): 7–26 | PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT BOHDAN Tetiana 1 1NGO “Growford Institute” OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-5336
FISCAL RULES АS AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF ADVANCED FISCAL INSTITUTIONS
The article demonstrates the advisability of applying fiscal rules as an important component of sound fiscal institutions, classifies types of such rules, and summarizes practices of their application across the globe. The author investigates distinctive features of fiscal institution development in the EU that are driven by excessive debt burden and the need for coordination of fiscal policies of sovereign governments in pursuing common monetary policies. Organizational and legal mechanisms of fiscal enforcement are revealed; emphasis is placed on the importance of the inclusion of automatic adjustment actions into the budgetary legislation if limits are about to be reached, as well as the inclusion of institutional restrictions and personal sanctions for civil servants. Proposals for expanding a list of fiscal rules and designing a mechanism for their implementation in Ukraine are substantiated in view of the need to restore debt sustainability and adopt EU standards. The author argues convincingly that it is advisable to introduce the lower limit on the cyclically adjusted balance of the general government and extend the scope of limit to cover debt of this government. The article contains specific proposals for introducing the automatic fiscal policies adjustment mechanism (so-called debt brake) if debt limits are about to be reached. Keywords:fiscal rules, fiscal institutions, European Union, structural balance, debt sustainability. JEL: H61, H87.
BOHDAN T. . FISCAL RULES АS AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF ADVANCED FISCAL INSTITUTIONS / T. . BOHDAN // Фінанси України. - 2016. - № 4. - C. 7-26. Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 26) | Download | Downloads :573 | 1. Leeper, E. M. (2009). Anchoring Fiscal Expectations. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, 3, 17–42. Retrieved from rbnz.govt.nz/research_and_ publications/reserve_bank_bulletin/2009/2009sep72_3leeper.pdf.
2. Schaechter, A., Kinda, T., Budina, N., Weber, A. (2012). Fiscal Rules in Response to the Crisis — Toward the “Next-Generation” Rules. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12187.pdf.
3. Kopits, G. (2011). Independent Fiscal Institutions: Developing Good Practices. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 11 (3), 1–18. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/Independent% 20Fiscal%20Institutions.pdf.
4. Cangiano, M. (2013). Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
5. Tornell, A., Lane, P. (1999). The Voracity Effect. The American Economic Review, 1, 22–46.
6. Odor, L. (2016). New Era of Fiscal Watchdogs: The Case of Slovakia. Retrieved from courses.ceu.edu/sites/courses.ceu.hu/files/attachment/course/3343/syllabuswint16odor.pdf.
7. Eyraud, L., Wu, T. (2015). Playing by the Rules: Reforming Fiscal Governance in Europe. IMF Working Paper, March.
8. Last, D. (2016). International Experiences with Fiscal Rules.
9. Debrun, X., Moulin, L., Turrini, A. (2008). Tied to the Mast? National Fiscal Rules in the European Union. Economic Policy, April, pp. 299—362.
10. Bova, E., Carcenac, N., Guerguil, M. (2014). Fiscal Rules and the Procyclicality of Fiscal Policy in the Developing World. IMF Working Paper, July.
11. Solbes, P. (n. d.). Towards Closer Economic Policy Coordination. Retrieved from europa.eu.int.
12. Last, D. (2016). Designing and Enforcing Fiscal Rules.
13. Awadzi, E. A. (2015). Designing Legal Frameworks for Public Debt Management. IMF Working Paper, July.
14. Jędrzejowicz, T., Kitala, M. (n. d.). The Response of Policymakers to National and European Fiscal Rules – the Case of Poland. Retrieved from www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/altri-atti-convegni/2014-public-finances-today/session3/ Jedrzejowicz_KitalaT.pdf.
|