№ 3/2017

Fìnansi Ukr. 2017 (3): 70–85https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2017.03.070

MONETARY POLICY

BORTNIKOV Gennadiy ¹, LYUBICH Oleksandr ²

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8388-6721
²SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9339-4242

Harmonization of the risk management mechanism of banks with international standards

The article states that the risk management system of banks according to modern standards should include all three lines of defense from risks. Authors suppose that additional and necessary level of protection should be a risk committee under the supervisory board of banks. The analysis shows that although large state-owned banks have improved the disclosure of information about the risk management system and the risks assumed, there is no clear position of management and supervisory boards on the acceptable level of risk appetite to all key financial risks. The authors emphasize the need to introduce a regulatory requirement to publish on an annual basis the results of regulatory stress testing of banks, to determine risk appetite in large Ukrainian banks, including state ones, and make it publicly available. It is found that target levels of solvency, liquidity and risk / return should be used as indicators of risk appetite, while state-owned banks should be leaders in the financial sector in disclosure of the risks introducing current risk culture. It is concluded that the system of remuneration in state banks requires regulation by the NBU in terms of the focus on the acceptable risk tolerance, separation of approaches to reward risk-takers and risk controllers.

Keywords:banks, banking, banking supervision, risk management, corporate governance.

JEL: G21, E52, E58.

Bortnikov G. . Harmonization of the risk management mechanism of banks with international standards / G. . Bortnikov, O. . Lyubich // Фінанси України. - 2017. - № 3. - C. 70-85.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 70 - 85)

Download

Downloads :935

1. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2015, July). Guidelines Corporate Governance Principles for Banks. Retrieved from www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d3
28.pdf.
2. Financial Stability Board. (2013, November 18). Principles for an Effective Risk Appetite Framework. Retrieved from www.fsb.org/2013/11/r_131118/?page_moved=1.
3. Central Bank of Ireland. (2014). Risk Appetite. A Discussion Paper. Retrieved from www.centralbank.ie/regulation/poldocs/dispapers/Documents/Risk%20Appetite%20Paper.pdf.
4. APRA. (2013, July). Supervisors Prudential Standard - SPS 220 Risk Management. Retrieved from www.apra.gov.au/Super/PrudentialFramework/Documents/Final-SPS-220-Risk-Management-July-2013.pdf.
5. International Finance Corporation. (2012). Standards on Risk Governance in Financial Institutions. IFC Advisory Services in Europe and Central Asia. Retrieved from www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/ce387e804c9ef58697c4d7f81ee631cc/ECACR-RiskGovernanceStandards.pdf? MOD=AJPERES.
6. Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategy Americas’. (2016, December). Navigating the Year ahead Banking Regulatory Outlook 2017. Retrieved from www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/regulatory/articles/banking-regulatory-outlook.html.
7. Risk management of basic banking. (2012). In A. O. Yepifanov, T. A. Vasy`l`yeva (Eds.). Risk management of banking (Vol. 1). Sumy`: DVNZ “UABS NBU” [in Ukrainian].
8. Pry`mostka, L. O., Chub, M. P., & Karcheva, H. T. (2011). Bank risks managemen. Ky`yiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
9. National Bank of Ukraine. (2004). Guidelines on the organization and operation of risk management in banks of Ukraine (Decree No. 361, August 2). Retrieved from bank.gov.ua/doccatalog/document?id=36985 [in Ukrainian].
10. National Bank of Ukraine. (2004). Guidelines for the banks’ inspection “Risk assessment system” (Decree No. 104, March 15). Retrieved from bank.gov.ua/doccatalog /document?id=36986 [in Ukrainian].
11. Financial Stability Board. (2013, February 12). Thematic Review on Risk Governance: Peer Review Report. Retrieved from www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/r_130212.pdf.
12. The future of bank risk management. (2014). McKinsey Working Papers on Risk. Retrieved from www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/risk/our-insights/the-future-of-bank-risk-management.
13. OECD. (2014). Risk Management and Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance.
doi.org/10.1787/9789264208636-en.
14. Societe Generale Group. (2016). Risk Report - Pillar 3 2015. Retrieved from www.societegenerale.com/sites/default/files/documents/Pilier%20III/2016-EN/UK_Pilier%203_18-03-2016.pdf.
15. Deutsche Bank. (n. d.). Annual Report 2015. Retrieved from annualreport.deutsche-bank.com/2015/ar/risk-report/risk-and-capital-framework/risk-appetite-and-capacity.html.
16. OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC and OTS. (2010, June 25). Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, 75 Fed. Reg. 36395. (Sound Incentive Compensation Policy (SICP) Guidance). Retrieved from www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/20100621a.htm.
17. EBA. (2015, December 21). Guidelines on sound remuneration policies under Articles 74(3) and 75(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU and disclosures under Article 450 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. Retrieved from www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1314839/EBA-GL-2015- 22+Guidelines+on+Sound+Remuneration+Policies_EN.pdf.
18. Bank of England. (2016, April 7). Solvency II: Remuneration requirements – CP13/16. Retrieved from www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Pages/publications/cp/2016/cp1316.aspx.
19. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2016, February 11). The principles of strategic reform of the state banking sector. Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=248824618& cat_id=244277212 [in Ukrainian].
20. Development Bank of Kazakhstan. (n. d.). Regulation on the Committee for Risk Management of the Development Bank of Kazakhstan. Retrieved from www.kdb.kz/ru/about/corporate_governance/normativno-pravovaya-baza/ [in Russian].