№ 8/2018

Fìnansi Ukr. 2018 (8): 32–44https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.08.032

FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC REGULATION

DYBA Mykhailo ¹, GERNEGO Iuliia ²

¹Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-9572
²Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/54148192200
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4929-0411

Creation of digital paradigm of social and economic development

The concept of information and communication technologies (ICTs) is central both to the economic development and increased potential for advancing progress towards social development nowadays. At the same time, the growth of Internet networks has a lot of benefits and disadvantages for society. Therefore, the global system of the digital economy, which refers to an economy that is based on digital computing technologies, is developed. The emergence and rapid widespread of social and economic manifestations of the digital economy led to the emergence and development of fundamental and applied research regarding above mentioned scientific problems. The purpose of the current study is to describe the digital paradigm as the main paradigm of the modern society evolution. It is aimed to analyze the peculiarities of the formation of conceptual understanding of the digital technologies as a qualitative indicator of social and economic development in the modern society. The question of factors of production evolution is studied in the article. This creates the basis for the digital paradigm of social and economic development. It is analyzed that ensuring social and economic growth can take place only under the condition of digital transformations, which are held instead of knowledge economy potential. The main principles of a creative economy, including talent, technology and tolerance, are emphasized. The complex nature of these elements is studied, which is a prerequisite for the creative economy development. The contemporary analytical researches are generalized to make the factor analysis of the creative economy and calculate the index of the creative economy on the basis of a matrix of intermediate indicators. The groups of innovation development imperatives manifestations are determined at the country level. In particular, the correlation between the global imperatives of innovation development and the imperatives of the innovation development of the state and economic entities is studied. It is proved that the evolution of the modern economic area, which is based on network communications, is held in accordance with scientific conceptions transformation within the process of the digital paradigm of social and economic development formation.

Keywords:digital economy, creative economy, innovative economy, information and cognitive technology (ICT), digitalization of society

JEL: G11, G20, I15, I22, O10

DYBA M. . Creation of digital paradigm of social and economic development / M. . DYBA, I. Gernego // Фінанси України. - 2018. - № 8. - C. 32-44.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 32 - 44)

Download

Downloads :550

1. Schumpeter, J. A. (1975). The Process of Creative Destruction. From Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. N. Y.: Harper.

2. Machlup, F. (1966). The Poduction and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

3. Drucker, P. F. (2007). The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. Moscow: Vil'yams [in Russian].

4. The World Bank. (1999). Knowledge for Development: World Development Report 1998/99. Washington, D. C. Retrieved from www.rrojasdatabank.info/wdr98/overview.pdf.

5. Rodriges, M. J. (Ed.). (2002). The New Knowledge Economy in Europe. A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pbl.
doi.org/10.4337/9781781950425

6. Blank, I. A. (2001). Basics of investment management. Ky'yiv: El'ha-N, Nika-Centr [in Ukrainian].

7. Heyec', V. M. (Ed.). (2015). Innovative Ukraine 2020. Ky'yiv: NAN Ukrayiny' [in Ukrainian].

8. Gitman, L. J, Joehnk, M. D. (1997). Fundamentals of Investing. Moscow: Delo [in Russian].

9. Tapscott, D. (1997). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril In The Age of Networked Intelligence. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.

10. Tapscott, D., Williams, A. D. (2010). Macrowikinomics: Rebooting Business and the World. N. Y.: Portfolio Hardcover.

11. Isaacson, W. (2017). The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution. Ky'yiv: Nash format [in Ukrainian].

12. Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

13. Hagen, R. (2018). The End of Ownership: Personal Property in the Digital Economy. Science and Public Policy, 45, 137-139.
doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx033

14. Toffler, A., Toffler, H. (2005). Revolutionary wealth. N. Y.: Knopf.
doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2006.00818.x

15. Schwienbacher, A., Larralde, B. (2010). Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1699183_code301672.pdf.
doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1699183

16. Sidenko, V. et al. (2017). Structural Transformations in the World Economy: Challenges for Ukraine. Ky'yiv: Zapovit [in Ukrainian].

17. Varnalij, Z. S. (2018). Ways to increase the tax competitiveness of Ukraine in terms of digitalization. In Taxation and economic security of the state in the era of digitalization (pp. 13-17). Irpin': UDFS Ukrayiny' [in Ukrainian].

18. Kraus, N. M., Holoborod'ko, O. P., & Kraus, K. M. (2018). Digital economy: trends and perspectives of the abangard change of development. Effective economy, 1. Retrieved from ojs.dsau.dp.ua/index.php/efektyvna-ekonomika/article/viewFile/997/862 [in Ukrainian].

19. Dulska, I. V. (2015). National economy digitalization priorities. Modern Problems of Economics and Business, 16, 34-40 [in Ukrainian].

20. Fedulova, L. I., Kornyeyeva, I. M. (2010). Peculiarities of knowledge economy at a current stage of society development: theory and practice of development in Ukraine. Actual problems of economics, 4, 73-86 [in Ukrainian].

21. Chukhno, A. A. (2012). Modernization of the economy and economic theory. Economy of Ukraine, 10, 24-33 [in Ukrainian].

22. Kolomiyec', H. M., Hlushach, Yu. S. (2017). The Digital Economy: Controversity of Content and Impact on Economic Development. Business Inform, 7, 137-143 [in Ukrainian].

23. Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (Eds.). (2013). Growth and Jobs in a Hyperconnected World: The Global Information Technology Report. World Economic Forum, INSEAD. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GITR_Report_2013.pdf.

24. Association of Industrial Automation of Ukraine. (2018). Industry 4.0 in mechanical engineering: the state of Ukraine and prospects of development. Ky'yiv: Author [in Ukrainian].

25. Baller, S., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (Eds.). (2016). Innovating in the Digital Economy: The Global Information Technology Report 2016. WEF, INSEAD. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/GITR_2016_full%20report_final.pdf.

26. Florida, R. (2005). The Flight of the Creative Class. N. Y.: Harper Business.
doi.org/10.4324/9780203997673

27. UNCTAD. (2010). Creative Economy: A Feasible Development Option: Creative Economy Report 2010. Retrieved from unctad.org/en/Docs/ditctab20103_en.pdf.

28. UNESCO. (2013). Creative Economy 2013. Special edition. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/culture/pdf/creative-economy-report-2013.pdf.

29. Żelazny, R., Pietrucha, J. (2017). Measuring innovation and institution: the creative economy index. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12 (1), 43-62.
doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i1.3

30. Potts, J. (2011). Creative Industries and Economic Evolution. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
doi.org/10.4337/9780857930705

31. Herneho, Yu. O. (2016). Identificarion of country innovative development imperatives. Scientific Journal of Kherson State University. Series "Economic Sciences", Iss. 19, Vol. 1, 29-32 [in Ukrainian].