Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 2/2021

№ 2/2021

Fìnansi Ukr. 2021 (2): 85–97
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.02.085

ACCOUNTING AND TAXATION

OLIYNYK Yana 1, KUCHERIAVA Maria 2

1SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/
2SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2948-1234


Assessment of Ukraine’s readiness for international automatic exchange of information for tax purposes


The implementation of a constituent element of a three-tier model of transfer pricing documentation – a report in the context of the countries of the multinational group of companies – is a prerequisite for Ukraine's joining the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement as a measure for implementation of Action 13. The Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, together with the State Tax Service of Ukraine, developed a Roadmap on preparation and harmonization of the draft regulatory legal acts necessary to ensure implementation of the Law of Ukraine dated January 16, 2020 No. 466-IX, according to which the development, approval and registration of the regulatory legal acts for the country-by-country reporting and the procedure for filling it out must be completed until November 23, 2020. The purpose of the article is to determine the institutional basis for improving the legislation of Ukraine in the field of international exchange of information for tax purposes, in particular, the development of recommendations and proposals of the OECD in the field of country-by-country reporting of the multinational group of companies. In the course of study, the authors examined the OECD documents that form the institutional basis for the development of methodological and organizational support for reporting in the context of countries. In accordance with Action 13 of the BEPS Action Plan, jurisdictions of the world have undertaken to increase the transparency of taxation by enshrining in law the requirement to disclose information on the general distribution of their income, taxes and other indicators by the location of economic activity of multinational group of companies. The comparative analysis of the termino­logy and content of information to be disclosed in the country-by-country reporting in accordance with OECD documentation and Law № 466-IX shows that there is a discrepancy in terminology, indicators and degree of data disclosure in some indicators.

Keywords:BEPS, transfer pricing; three-tiered approach to transfer pricing documentation, Country-by-Country reporting, OECD, International Automatic Exchange of Information for Tax purposes, fiscal risks of tax avoidance

JEL: H20, H21, M40, M48


OLIYNYK Y. . Assessment of Ukraine’s readiness for international automatic exchange of information for tax purposes / Y. . OLIYNYK , M. Kucheriava // Фінанси України. - 2021. - № 2. - C. 85-97.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 85 - 97) DownloadDownloads :112
1. OECD. (2017). OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. doi.org/10.1787/tpg-2017-en
2. Kalach, H., & Korin, I. (2020). Measures against aggregate tax planning in Ukraine. International Scientific Journal “Internauka”. Series: “Economic Sciences”. 2020. Retrieved from www.inter-nauka.com/uploads/public/158470876698.pdf [in Ukrainian].
3. Lovinska, L., & Oliynyk, Ya. (2020). Implementation of international recommendations for application of a three-tiered approach to transfer pricing documentation in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 9, 95–109 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.09.095
4. Oleynikova, L. (2019). Overcoming tax information asymmetry. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 58–75 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.11.058
5. Oliynyk, Ya. (2020). Report in terms of countries of the international group of companies: challenges and implementation status. In Current state and prospects of development of accounting, analysis, audit, reporting and taxation in the context of European integration, 70–72. Retrieved from dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/29941/1/%D0%9E%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%20%D0%AF.%D0%92.pdf [in Ukrainian].
6. Oliynyk, Ya. V., & Kucheriava, M. V. (2020). Countering aggressive tax planning: global challenges and national practices. In Accounting, analysis, audit and taxation: a modern paradigm in terms of sustainable development, 500–502. Kyiv: KNTEU [in Ukrainian].
7. Oliynyk, Ya., & Chyzhykova, O. (2019). Institutional implementation of transfer pricing: global context and prospects for Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 2, 99–110 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.02.099
8. Brown, R., Jorgensen, B., & Pope, P. (2019). The interplay between mandatory country-by-country reporting, geographic segment reporting, and tax havens: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38 (2), 106–129. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.02.001
9. Hugger, F. (2019). The Impact of Country-by-Country Reporting on Corporate Tax Avoidance. Working Papers, 304. Retrieved from www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/
199078/1/wp-2019-304-hugger-corporate-tax-avoidance.pdf.
10. Hanlon, M. (2018). Country-by-Country Reporting and the International Allocation of Taxing Rights. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD). Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3118531.
11. Sawyer, A., & Sadiq, K. (2019, February). Country-by-Country Tax Reporting: A Critical Analysis of Enhanced Regulatory Requirements for Multinational Corporations. Company and Securities Law Journal. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/331331925_Country-by-Country_Tax_Reporting_A_Critical_Analysis_of_Enhanced_Regulatory_Requirements_for_Multinational_Corporations.
12. Rozas, J. A. Nastri, M. P., & Sonetti, E. (2019). Assessing Tax Risk by “Country-by-Country Reporting”. The Future of Risk Management, I, 397–420. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14548-4_17
13. Jovanović, T. (2018). Quality of reporting on transfer pricing: Prerequisite of the quality tax reporting of related parties. Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici, 39, 305–327. doi.org/10.5937/AnEkSub1839305J
14. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020). On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine to Improve Tax Administration, Eliminate Technical and Logical Inconsistencies in Tax Legislation (Act No. 466-IX, January 16). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/466-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
15. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2020). On approval of the form and the Procedure for filling in the Report in terms of countries of the international group of companies (Order No. 764, December 14). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0155-21#Text [in Ukrainian].
16. OECD. (2015). Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting. Action 13 - 2015 Final Report. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264241480-en..
17. OECD. (2019). Country-by-Country Reporting XML Schema: User Guide for Tax Administrations. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/beps/country-by-country-reporting-xml-schema-user-guide-for-tax-administrations-june-2019.pdf.
18. OECD. (2019). Common errors made by MNEs in preparing Country-by-Country reports. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/beps/common-errors-mnes-cbc-reports.pdf.
19. OECD. (2019). Guidance on the Implementation of Country-by-Country Reporting: BEPS Action 13. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/ctp/guidance-on-the-implementation-of-country-by-country-reporting-beps-action-13.pdf.
20. OECD. (2020). Public consultation document: Review of Country-by-Country Reporting (BEPS Action 13). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/beps/public-consultation-document-review-country-by-country-reporting-beps-action-13-march-
2020.pdf.
21. OECD. (2020). Country-by-Country Reporting – Compilation of Peer Review Reports (Phase 3): Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 13. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/fa6d31d7-en