№ 5/2021

Fìnansi Ukr. 2021 (5): 58–81https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.05.058

TAX POLICY

SOKOLOVSKA Alla ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-8215

Evaluation of tax benefits effectiveness for certain types of activities in Ukraine

One of the stages of effective public administration of the processes of granting and applying tax benefits is to assess its effectiveness and efficiency in order to determine the feasibility of further use of tax benefits or adjustments to the policy of state support of economic agents using tax levers. The purpose of the article is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the application of tax benefits in Ukraine on the basis of methodological approaches developed by Western scientists, if the necessary information is available. The object of the study is the tax benefits introduced on a temporary basis for certain priority activities identified as requiring government support. The main sources of information for evaluation were the data of the State Tax Service of Ukraine on the amounts of tax benefits that are losses of budget revenues and other tax benefits for 2014-2019, reports of the Accounting Chamber, reports of the State Space Agency of Ukraine, data of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Internet resources. The first part of the article presents the results of the assessment of tax benefits for aircraft manufacturers and producers of alternative fuels obtained in 2014-2019. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that although the state support for aircraft manufacturing entities provided in the form of tax incentives contributes to solving current problems, it is insufficient to achieve the targets of development of the capital-intensive industry, which requires a significant amount of financial resources, and therefore must be supplemented by other forms of the state support, the source of which are direct budget expenditures. As for the tax benefits provided to producers of alternative fuels, they are considered ineffective because they did not lead to an increase in biofuel production, so they should be supplemented by benefits aimed at stimulating its consumption: decrease in excise tax rates on biodiesel and its mixtures and motor gasolines containing bioethanol; introducing mandatory market quotas for the content of bioactive components in blended fuels, which is considered a tool for generating guaranteed demand for motor biofuels.

Keywords:tax benefits for aircraft construction and producers of alternative fuels, effectiveness and efficiency of tax benefits, tax and budget expenditures, state support for certain types of economic activity

JEL: H21, H23, H30, G18

Sokolovska A. . Evaluation of tax benefits effectiveness for certain types of activities in Ukraine / A. . Sokolovska // Фінанси України. - 2021. - № 5. - C. 58-81.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 58 - 81)

Download

Downloads :128

1. Bolnick, B. (2004, February). Effectiveness and Economic Impact of Tax Incentives in the SADC Region. Retrieved from www.nathaninc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ Effectiveness_and_Economic_Impact_of_Tax_Incentives_in_the_SADC_Region.pdf.
2. Busom, I. (1999). An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies, University of California. Burch Working Paper, B99-05. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.170561
3. Gonzalez, X., Jaumandreu, J., & Pazo, C. (2005). Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness. RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (4), 930–950. Retrieved from www.re-searchgate.net/publication/24049332_Barriers_to_Innovation_and_Subsidy_Effectiveness.
4. Roca, J. (2010). Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Tax Benefits. Discussion Paper, IDB-DP-136. Retrieved from publications.iadb.org/publications/ english/document/Evaluation-of-the-Effectiveness-and-Efficiency-of-Tax-Benefits.pdf.
5. Hall, B. H., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). Fiscal Incentives for R&D: A New Review of the Evidence. Research Policy, 29, 449–469. doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2
6. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2010). On amendments to some laws of Ukraine on state support of the aircraft industry in Ukraine (Act No. 1814-VI, January 20). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1814-17/ed20100120#Text [in Ukrainian].
7. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2016). On Amendments to Section XX “Transitional Provisions” of the Tax Code of Ukraine (on Support of the Aircraft Industry) (Explanatory Note to the Draft Law of Ukraine). Retrieved from ips.ligazakon.net/document/ jh2o100i?an=10 [in Ukrainian].
8. Accounting Chamber. (2019). Report on the results of the analysis of the effectiveness of the application of tax benefits by business entities and their impact on the development of aircraft construction (Decision No. 12-3, May 28). Retrieved from rp.gov.ua/upload-files/Activity/Collegium/2019/12-3_2019/Zvit_12-3_2019.pdf [in Ukrainian].
9. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2017). The procedure for monitoring the use of re¬leased funds of enterprises - aircraft manufacturers, which are subject to the provisions of Article 2 of the Law of Ukraine “On the development of the aircraft industry” (Decree No. 476, June 7). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/476-2017-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
10. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n. d.). Production of industrial products by type in 2013–2019. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2016/pr/vr_rea_ ovpp/vr_rea_ovpp_u/arh_vppv_u.html [in Ukrainian].
11. Bondarchuk, V. (2018, August 21). Chronicle of the diving industry, or how Ukraine is losing aircraft construction. Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com. ua/publications/2018/08/21/639792/ [in Ukrainian].
12. Thompson, L. (2010). European Aircraft Subsidies. A Study of Unfair Trade Practices. Retrieved from www.lexingtoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/EuropeanSubsidies BrochureFinal.pdf.
13. Senate Bill Report SB 5952. (2013, November 8). Retrieved from lawfilesext. leg.wa.gov/biennium/2013-14/Htm/Bill%20Reports/Senate/5952%20SBA%20WM%20 13%20E3.htm?q=20201202032557.
14. Greene, M., Munn, J., & Sanger, T. (2014, June 19). Many tax incentives serve grow¬ing aviation industry. Journal of Business. Retrieved from www.spokanejournal.com/ up-close/many-tax-incentives-serve-growing-aviation-industry/.
15. Brown, M. (2016, December 7). WTO Panel Finds That US Tax Incentives For Aircraft Constitute Prohibited Subsidies. Retrieved from www.mayerbrown.com/-/media/ files/perspectives-events/publications/2016/12/wto-panel-finds-that-us-tax-incentives-for-aircraf/files/get-the-full-report/fileattachment/161206-update-ggt.pdf.
16. Defense Express. (2019, December 16). The aviation industry of Ukraine is on a shav¬ing flight. Retrieved from defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/aviatsijna_promislo-vist_ukrajini_na_brijuchomu_poloti-250.html [in Ukrainian].
17. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2007). About modification of some legislative acts of Ukraine concerning stimulation of measures on energy saving (Act No. 760-V, March 16). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/760-16/ed20070316#Text [in Ukrainian].
18. Information on the progress of the Action Plan for the implementation of the Strategy for the development of the public financial management system (for the fourth quarter of 2014) (n. d.). [in Ukrainian].
19. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2014). National Renewable Energy Action Plan until 2020 (Decree No. 902-r, October 1). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/902-2014-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
20. Accounting Chamber. (2015). On the results of the analysis of the state of adminis¬tration of tax benefits provided to economic entities engaged in the production of alternative fuels, and their impact on revenues to the state budget (Decision No. 5-3, September 22). Retrieved from old.ac-rada.gov.ua/doccatalog/document/16746736/R_RP_5-3.pdf;jse ssionid=64EF34D459D304AC8276EDEF69C42B1F [in Ukrainian].
21. Office of effective regulation. (2019). Green Paper. Regulation of production of liquid motor biofuels. Retrieved from saf.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/regulation-of-production-of-liquid-motor-biofuels-2019.pdf [in Ukrainian].
22. Trypolska, G., & Kyryziuk, S. (2018). Development of Ukraine's bioenergy sector in the context of the EU guidelines. Economy and Forecasting, 3, 138–159 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.03.138
23. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2012). On amendments to some laws of Ukraine on the production and use of motor fuels containing biocomponents (Act No. 4970-VI, June 19). Retrieved from search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/T124970.html [in Ukrainian].
24. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2009, April 23). Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently re¬pealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0028&from=EN.
25. Bitnere, K., & Searle, S. (2017). Effective policy design for promoting investment in advanced alternative fuels. Retrieved from theicct.org/sites/default/files/publica¬tions/Advanced-alternative-fuels_ICCT-white-paper_21092017_vF.pdf.
26. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2015, September 9). Directive (EU) 2015/1513 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015L1513&fro m=EN.