№ 5/2021

Fìnansi Ukr. 2021 (5): 97–110https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.05.097

BUDGET POLICY

NYKYFOROV Anatolii ¹

¹Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8480-0870

Budget efficiency of tax incentives for innovative activity

The article is devoted to the topical issues of determining the budget effectiveness of the use of tax incentives for innovation. The conceptual difference between “budgetary effect” and “budget efficiency” has been defined. A reasonable criterion of the budgetary effect, which is proposed to calculate as the difference between financial results of innovation and expenditures (temporary budget losses) to stimulate innovation. The method of justifying the budgetary effect of tax incentives for innovation by applying an increased standard of write-offs on the cost of spending on scientific and scientific and technical works has been proposed. The proposed methodology uses a recursive model for calculating tax revenues starting with the development of innovative products, which occurs as a result of the reinvestment by the subject of innovation in the first stage – savings from tax cuts, in the second and subsequent stages – the said savings and part of the increase in profits. The increments of investment resources of the subject of innovation and budget revenues are determined taking into account the factor of time of their receipt by the method of discounting. The budgetary effect is proposed to assess during the regulatory period of return on investment. The article contains a logical illustration of the recursive model of tax revenues and the calculation formula. Based on the data of the innovative enterprise, the indicators of the budget effect, the internal rate of budget revenue and the payback period of its losses, which arise due to the introduction of an increased rate of write-off for the cost of scientific and scientific-technical works have been calculated . It is recommended when making decisions on the feasibility of tax incentives for innovation to take into account the stimulating function of taxes, which is manifested in increased motivation of entrepreneurs to innovate. Keywords: taxes, tax policy, innovation, budget efficiency.

Keywords:taxes, tax policy, innovation, budget efficiency

JEL: O38, Y10, Z18

Nykyforov A. . Budget efficiency of tax incentives for innovative activity / A. . Nykyforov // Фінанси України. - 2021. - № 5. - C. 97-110.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 97 - 110)

Download

Downloads :134

1. Heyets, V. (2014). Institutional conditionality of innovation processes in the industrial development of Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 12, 4–19 [in Ukrainian].
2. Iefymenko, T. I. (2018). Financial regulation of reproductive dynamics of market systems. In: Grytsenko A. A. (Ed.). Reproductive dynamics of economic systems: institutions and activities, 283–325. Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/297.pdf [in Ukrainian].
3. Zhylinska, O., & Cheberkus, D. (2007). Preferential taxation of research and development costs: theoretical and practical aspects. Finance of Ukraine, 12, 60–73 [in Ukrainian].
4. Ivanov, Yu. B., Orlov, P. A., & Ivanova, O. Yu. (2008). Competitive advantages of the enterprise: assessment, formation and development. Kharkiv: INZHEK [in Ukrainian].
5. Kyzym, M. O. (2011). Industrial policy and clustering of Ukraine\\\\\\\'s economy. Kharkiv: INZHEK [in Ukrainian].
6. Kvasniuk, B. Ie. (2005). Competitiveness of the national economy. Kyiv: Phoenix [in Ukrainian].
7. Krupka, M. I. (2001). Financial and credit mechanism of innovative development of the economy of Ukraine. Lviv: VC LNU [in Ukrainian].
8. Kuznietsova, A. Ya. (2004). Financial mechanisms for stimulating investment and innovation activities. Lviv: Lviv Banking Institute of the NBU [in Ukrainian].
9. Sokolovska, A. M., Iefymenko, T. I., Lunina, I. O. et al. (2006). The system of tax benefits in Ukraine in the context of European experience. Kyiv: RFI [in Ukrainian].
10. Malitskyi, B. A., & Popovych, O. S. (2005). Science, technology and innovation policy: the main mechanisms of formation and implementation. Kyiv: Phoenix [in Ukrainian] .
11. Onyshko, S. V. (2004). Financial support of innovative development. Irpin: National Academy of the State Tax Service of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
12. Popovych, O. S. (2019). Science, technology and innovation policy: the main mechanisms of formation and implementation (2nd Ed.). Kyiv: NAS of Ukraine, H. M. Dobrov Institute for Research of Scientific and Technical Potential and History of Science [in Ukrainian]
13. Soloviov, V. P., Malitskyi, B. A., & Popovych, O. S. (2004). Rational financing of science as a prerequisite for the development of knowledge society in Ukraine. Kyiv: Phoenix [in Ukrainian].
14. Shablysta, L. M., & Sokolovska-Hontarenko, I. Ye. (2011). Theoretical and methodological bases of modern scientific approaches to construction of the optimal system of taxation of business entities of Ukraine. Collection of scientific works of the National University of the State Tax Service, 1, 529–538 [in Ukrainian].
15. Appelt, S., Bajgar, M., Criscuolo, C., & Galindo-Rueda, F. (2016). R&D Tax Incentives: Evidence on design, incidence and impacts. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 32. doi.org/10.1787/5jlr8fldqk7j-en
16. Westmore, B. (2014). Policy incentives for private innovation and maximizing the returns. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2013/1, 121–163. doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2013-5k3trmjlhxzq
17. Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003). The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12 (3), 225–243. doi.org/10.1080/10438590290004555
18. Kergroach, S., Chicot, J., Petroli, C., Pruess, J., Van Ooijen, C., Ono, N. I. et al. (2016). Mapping the policy mix for innovation: the OECD STI Outlook and the EC / OECD International STIP Database. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.
19. EC (European Commission), & OECD (forthcoming). (2016). International Database on Science, Technology and Innovation Policies (STIP). Retrieved from www. innovationpolicyplatform.org/sti-policy-database.
20. Innovation Policy Platform. (n. d.). Innovation Policy Platform, module on Financing Innovation. Retrieved from www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/financing-innovation?topic-filters=11384.
21. Nykyforov, A., Dyba, V., & Parniuk, V. (2009). Tax incentives for innovation. Finance of Ukraine, 5, 78–86 [in Ukrainian].
22. Ministry of Economy of Ukraine, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, & Ministry of Industrial Policy of Ukraine. (2005). Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative projects and technology parks (Order No. 434/668/442, November 21). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0434665-05#Text [in Ukrainian].
23. Svitlichna, Yu. V. (2007). Efficiency of functioning of regional economic systems. Collection of scientific works of the Donbas National Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture. Series Economics of Construction and Municipal, 3 (1) [in Ukrainian].
24. Pukhtaievych, H. O. (2005). Analysis of the national economy. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
25. Blank, I. A. (2001). Investment management. Kiev: Nika-Center [in Russian].
26. Peresada, A. A. (2002). Investment process management. Kyiv: Libra [in Ukrainian].
27. Chirkov, V. G. (2005). Effectsometry. Kiev: Phoenix [in Russian].