Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 6/2021

№ 6/2021

Fìnansi Ukr. 2021 (6): 109–128
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.06.109

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSIONS

LYUBICH Oleksandr 1, STRYZHAK Oleksandr 2

1SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9339-4242
2SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4954-3650


Transdisciplinary narrative discourse as a technological basis of financial interaction


The conditions for ensuring financial interaction based on the identification and transdisciplinary consolidation of financial resources and technologies are described. For this reason systems of interactive knowledge bases on financial resources and presentation of their semantics based on the formation of growing pyramidal networks in the analysis of financial narratives are outlined . The conditions of stability of systems of such knowledge on the basis of their representation in the format of transdisciplinary narrative discourse are determined. The conditions of atypical representation of linguistic constructs of financial knowledge in the process of their transformation into an interactive knowledge system are determined. The use of lambda calculus notation for the formation of stable states of transdisciplinary narrative discourse is proposed. Financial interaction is determined through the relationship between financial assets and related services. To formalize them, a metacategory of transdisciplinarity is introduced, which is defined in their verbal activity, reflexivity and recursiveness. Moreover, transdisciplinarity defines such hyperproperty as "consolidated information". This allows you to activate in the process of financial interaction, which is manifested in the format of a cognitive-communicative act between the relevant information resources and financial decision makers. The set of transformations of taxonomic diversity of financial documents into the format of narrative discourse is described. Taxonomic diversity is defined as a set of hierarchically related alternatives to provide multicriteria choices in financial decision making. An ontology of the choice problem is given, which provides a correct interpretation of the financial decision. It is proposed to implement financial solutions on the basis of the ontology of the problem of choice.

Keywords:financial interaction, financial assets, narrative, discourse, transdisciplinarity, growing pyramidal networks, concepts, linguistic constructs, term, knowledge

JEL: E42, E52, E58


Lyubich O. . Transdisciplinary narrative discourse as a technological basis of financial interaction / O. . Lyubich, O. Stryzhak // Фінанси України. - 2021. - № 6. - C. 109-128.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 109 - 128) DownloadDownloads :113
1. Iefymenko, T. (2016). Fiscal and Monetary Security of National Economy. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
2. Lyubich, O. O. (2004). Theoretical foundations of financial decision making at the macro level. Kyiv: RFI [in Ukrainian].
3. Dovgyi, S., & Stryzhak, O. (2021). Transdisciplinary Fundamentals of Information-Analytical Activity. In: Ilchenko, M., Uryvsky, L., & Globa L. (Eds.). MCT: 2019. Advances in Information and Communication Technology and Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 152, 99–126. Cham: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58359-0_7
4. Aksu-Koç, A., & Aktan-Erciyes, A. (2018). Narrative Discourse: Developmental Perspectives. In: Handbook of Communication Disorders, 229–356. Mouton: De Gruyter. doi.org/10.1515/9781614514909-017
5. Elson, D. K. (2012). Modeling Narrative Discourse (PhD Thesis). New York: Columbia University.
6. Shyrokov, V. A. (2017). Information. System: Transdisciplinarity in linguistics. Kiev [in Russian].
7. Honchar, A. V., Stryzhak, O. Ye., & Berkman, L. N. (2021). Transdisciplinary consolidation of information environments. Connectivity, 1 (149), 3–9 [in Ukrainian].doi.org/10.31673/2412-9070.2021.010310
8. Velychko, V. (2019). Logical and linguistic models as a technological basis for interactive knowledge bases. Information Models and Analyses, 8 (4), 325–340 [in Russian].
9. FATF 40 Recommendations. (n. d.). Wire transfers (Recommendation 16). Retrieved from www.cfatf-gafic.org/index.php/documents/fatf-40r/382-fatf-recommendation-16-wire-transfers.
10. FATF 40 Recommendations. (n. d.). New technologies (Recommendation 15). Retrieved from www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfrecommendations/documents/fatf-recommendations.html.
11. Congress of the USA. (2020). Section 6308. In: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Act H. R. 6395, December 15). Retrieved from govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr6395/text.
12. AIIM Industry Watch. (2021). Big Data and Content Analytics: measuring the ROI. Retrieved from www.aiim.org/Resources/Research/Industry-Watches/2013/2013_Nov_Big.
13. Stryzhak, O., Dovgyi, S., Popova, M., & Chepkov, R. (2021). Transdisciplinary Prin­ciples of Narrative Discourse as a Basis for the Use of Big Data Communicative Properties. In: Arai, K. (Ed.). Advances in Information and Communication. FICC 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1364, 258–273. Cham: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73103-8_17
14. Stryzhak, O., Horborukov, V., Prychodniuk, V., Franchuk, O., & Chepkov, R. (2021). Decision-making System Based on The Ontology of The Choice Problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1827, 012007. doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1828/1/012007
15. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, Penn.: RWS Publications.
16. Chen, Ch. H., Trappey, C. H., Peruzzini, M., Stjepandić, J., & Wognum, N. (2017). Transdisciplinary Engineering: A Paradigm Shift. Proceedings of the 24th ISPE Inc. International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, Series Advances in Trans­disciplinary Engineering, 5. Retrieved from ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/transdisciplinary-engineering-a-paradigm-shift-proceedings-of-the-24th-ispe-inc-international-conference-on-transdisciplinary-engineering-july-10ndash14-2017.
17. ISO. (2019). Systems and software engineering – Taxonomy of systems of systems (ISO/IEC/IEEE 21841:2019 (en)). Retrieved from www.iso.org/standard/71957.html.
18. ISO. (2009). Information technology – Taxonomy of cultural and linguistic adaptability user requirements (ISO/IEC TR 24785:2009 (en)). Retrieved from www.iso.org/standard/41555.html.
19. NATO. (2016, March 14). C3 Taxonomy Baseline 2.0 (AC/322-D(12016)0017). Retrieved from www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_08/20180801_
180801-ac322-d_2016_0017-c3t.pdf.
20. Shatalkin, A. I. (2016). Taxonomy. Foundations, principles and rules. Moscow: KMK Scientific Publishing Association [in Russian].
21. Voevodsky, V. (2011). Univalent Foundations of Mathematics. Proceedings of Logic, Language, Information and Computation. In: Beklemishev, L. D., & De Queiroz, R. (Eds.). WoLLIC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6642, 311. Berlin: Heidelber: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20920-8
22. Mendelssohn, E. (1971). Introduction to mathematical logic. Moscow: Science [in Russian].
23. Univalent Foundations Program. (2013). Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics. Princeton: Institute for Advanced Study.
24. Barendregt H. Lambda calculus. Its syntax and semantics. Moscow: Mir [in Russian].
25. Gladun, V. P., Vashchenko, N. D., Velichko, V. Yu., & Tkachenko, Yu. G. (2004). Structuring and analysis of data in growing pyramidal networks. System research and information technologies, 1, 82–92. Retrieved from journal.iasa.kpi.ua/article/view/172491/
172196 [in Russian].
26. Gladun, V. (1994). Processes of formation of new knowledge. Sophia: SD "Teacher 6".
27. Dymarskyi, M. Ya. (2015). Ways of embodiment of the predicative relation. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, XI (1) (Categories of nouns and verbs in the system of functional grammar), 41–62 [in Russian].
28. Kurdyumov, V. A. (1999). Idea and form. Fundamentals of the predication concept of language. Moscow: Military University [in Russian].
29. Kulbabska, O. V. Modern interpretations of the category of predication in linguistics. Ukrainian language, 1, 61–73 [in Ukrainian].
30. Kapitonova, T. A. (2009). Neural network modeling in pattern recognition. Philosophical and methodological aspects. Minsk: Belarusian Science [in Russian].
31. Cocchiarella, N. B. (1989). Philosophical Perspectives on Formal Theories of Predication. Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Synthese Library (Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science), 167, 253–326. doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1171-0_3