№ 8/2021

Fìnansi Ukr. 2021 (8): 24–46https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.08.024

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSIONS

STRYZHAK Oleksandr ¹, OLIYNYK Yana ²

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4954-3650
²SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/

Transdisciplinary characteristics of production in the knowledge society

The article describes the technological aspects of the knowledge society. It is determined that modern productions are knowledge-oriented and significantly depend on scientific and technical products. Information processes that reflect the knowledge systems that describe modern production are studied, and their transdisciplinarity is determined. The technological constructs of the knowledge society are distinguished. The tasks of information-analytical support of the processes of its economic development are described. Aspects of forecast assessment of technical and economic indicators and decision support are determined. Cognitive meta-tasks for processing documentary knowledge systems, databases and knowledge are distinguished: structuring, analysis, synthesis and selection. The transdisciplinary integration of information resources that reflect the state of production in the knowledge society is described. The processes of information retrieval and formation of network digital collections of text documents relevant to the topics of research and examination are characterized. The implementation of the interactive form of interaction with each document and ensuring its attributive integration with the processed information resources is determined. The processes of continuous monitoring of network information resources, formation of interoperable protocols to support network-centric interaction and interconnection between documents; conducting multi-criteria comparative analysis of information sources by their properties and sampling according to the specified criteria of the relevant records and documents found in information systems and environments are described. A description of an example of transdisciplinary monitoring of production and products based on transdisciplinary analysis and reflection of information resources of the shipbuilding industry is provided.

Keywords:knowledge, taxonomy, ontology, manufacturingnarrative, transdisciplinarity, linguistic systems, decision-making

JEL: E42, E52, E58

Stryzhak O. . Transdisciplinary characteristics of production in the knowledge society / O. Stryzhak, Y. . OLIYNYK // Фінанси України. - 2021. - № 8. - C. 24-46.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 24 - 46)

Download

Downloads :129

1. Stryzhak, O. Horborukov, V., Prychodniuk, V., Franchuk, O., & Chepkov, R. (2021). Decision-making System Based on Th e Ontology of Th e Choice Problem. Journal of Physscs: Conference Series, 1828. doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1828/1/012007
2. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. Th e Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
3. Chen, Ch.-H., Trappey, A. C., Peruzzini, M., Stjepandić, J., & Wognum, N. (Eds.). (2017). Transdisciplinary Engineering: A Paradigm Shift (Proceedings of the 24th ISPE Inc. International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, July 10–14, 2017), vol. 5. IOS Press BV.
4. Zgurovskiy, M. (2006, January 20). Th e path to a knowledge-based society. Mirror of the week. Retrieved from zn.ua/EDUCATION/put_k_obschestvu,_osnovannomu_na_znaniyah.html [in Russian].
5. UNESCO. (2005). Towards Knowledge Societies (UNESCO World Report). UNESCO Publishing.
6. Dovgyi, S., & Stryzhak, O. (2021). Transdisciplinary Fundamentals of Information-Analytical Activity. In: Ilchenko, M., Uryvsky, L., & Globa, L. (Eds.). Advances in Information and Communication Technology and Systems (MCT 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems), vol. 152. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58359-0_7
7. Shirokov, V. A. (2017). Language. Information. System: transdisciplinarity in linguistics. Kiev [in Russian].
8. Rooney, D., Hearn, G., Mandeville, T., & Joseph, R. (2003). Public Policy in Knowledge-Based Economies: Foundations and Frameworks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. Honchar, A. V., Stryzhak, O. Ye., & Berkman, L. N. (2021). Transdisciplinary consolidation of information environments. Connectivity, 1 (149), 3–9 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.31673/2412-9070.2021.010310
10. Velychko, V. (2019). Logical and linguistic models as a technological basis for interactive knowledge bases. Information Models and Analyses, 8 (4), 325–340 [in Russian].
11. AIIM. (2021). AIIM Industry Watch: “Big Data and Content Analytics: measuring the ROI”. Retrieved from www.aiim.org/Resources/Research/Industry-Watches/2013/2013_Nov_Big-Data.
12. Reinsel, D., Gantz, J., & Rydning, J. (2018, November). Th e Digitization of the World. From Edge to Core. Retrieved from www.seagate.com/fi les/www-content/our-story/trends/fi les/idc-seagate-dataage-whitepaper.pdf.
13. Nadutenko, M. V. (2016). Virtualized lexicographic systems and their application in applied linguistics (PhD Th esis). Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: National Library of Ukraine named after V. I. Vernadskyi [in Ukrainian].
14. Shyrokov, V. A., Buhakov, O. V., Zaika, N. M., Hriaznuhina, T. O., Kryhin, M. O., Nadutenko, M. V. et al. (2018). Corpus and cognitive linguistics. In Linguistic and information studies (Proceedings of the Ukrainian language and information fund of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine), vol. 4. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
15. Stryzhak, O. Ye. Transdisciplinary integration of information resources (Dr. Sc. Th esis). Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space [in Ukrainian].
16. Stryzhak, O. Ye., Potapov H. M., Prychodniuk, V. V., & Chepkov, R. I. (2019). Evolution of management – from situational to transdisciplinary. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 30 (2), 91–112. doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2019.2.91-112
17. Lyubich, O., & Stryzhak, O. (2021). Transdisciplinary narrative discourse as a technological basis of financial interaction. Finance of Ukraine, 6, 109–128 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.06.109
18. Romanenkov, Yu., & Vartanian, V. (2016). Formation of prognostic software support strategic decision-making in an organization. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/9 (80), 25–34. doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.66306
19. Romanenkov, Yu. A., Vartanian, V. M., & Zeintsev, T. H. (2016). Interval optimization model of resource allocation in the system of business processes of the organization. Mathematical and computer modelling. Series: Technical sciences, 13, 126–138 [in Russian].
20. Arbuzov, S. H., Kolobov, Yu. V., Mishchenko, V. I., & Naumenkova, S. V. (2011). Pareto law. In: Banking encyclopedia, pp. 178–179. Kyiv: CND NBU: Znannia [in Ukrainian].
21. Stryzhak, O. Ye, Velychko, V. Yu., Dovhyi, S. A. et al. (2020). Computer program “Cognitive IT platform POLYEDRON” (“POLYHEDRON”) (Author's certifi cate No. 96078) [in Ukrainian].