Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 8/2021

№ 8/2021

Fìnansi Ukr. 2021 (8): 100–112
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.08.100

TAX POLICY

POLIAKOV Mykhailo 1

1Philip Morris Ukraine


Tendencies and limitations on increasing excise tax on cigarettes in EU member states


The recent studies of levying excise tax on cigarettes and the policy of the EU and its member states aimed at setting a minimum excise tax thereon have been analyzed in order to substantiate recommendations on the respective reform in Ukraine. The article confirms findings that a sharp increase in the excise tax (high excise rates) lead to the growth of illicit trade in such products. For that reason, when initiating corresponding changes to legislation, it is essential to choose such pace of increase in tax rates that would take into account the purchasing power and the level of such rates in neighboring countries. Even severe tax control measures may turn out to be inefficient if there are any conditions for getting high profits from the illicit market. Achieving excise revenue growth without fiscal losses due to the increase in illicit tobacco trade is possible only through a gradual increase in tax rates. It has been established that the negative experience of a number of the new EU countries in reaching the EU minimum excise tax on cigarettes should be taken into consideration while designing future pan-European legislative changes to avoid decisions that would either set out too high target thresholds or disregard the need to provide a sufficient transition period to achieve them. Today significant differences persist in the levels of purchasing power in the member states and there are still opportunities for smuggling cigarettes into the EU through its eastern borders. Given this, several post-socialist EU countries remain vulnerable to new increases in the minimum excise tax on cigarettes and are unlikely to agree on legislative changes that set forth “jumps” in the excise tax rates or their significant growth in the coming years. It has also been demonstrated that most EU countries have abstained from raising cigarette excise tax significantly during the COVID crisis for fear of the illicit trade growth. It has been proven that Ukraine should review the current plan on increasing cigarette excise tax by slowing down the tax growth and extending the plan till 2028.

Keywords:tobacco products, cigarettes, tobacco market, illicit trade in cigarettes, excise tax, tax burden

JEL: Н21, Н25, H26


Poliakov M. . Tendencies and limitations on increasing excise tax on cigarettes in EU member states / M. Poliakov // Фінанси України. - 2021. - № 8. - C. 100-112.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 100 - 112) DownloadDownloads :112
1. Laffer, A. B. (2014). Tobacco Taxation: Th eory and Practice. San Francisco: The Laff er Center at the Pacific Research Institute.
2. European Commission. (2020, February 10). Evaluation of the Council Directive 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (Commission staff working document). Retrieved from data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5960-2020-ADD-1/en/pdf.
3. Institute for Market Economics. (2018, January). Economic Analysis of the Excise Duty Policy on Tobacco Products in Bulgaria and Its Eff ects on the Illegal Market (2007-2017). Retrieved from ime.bg/var/images/Excise_policy_tobacco_IME_18_EN.pdf.
4. Korotun, V. I. (Ed.). (2018). The dialectic of reforming the excise taxation of tobacco products in Ukraine: the European integration aspect. Kyiv: Alerta [in Ukrainian].
5. Sokolovska, A. M. (Ed.). (2017). Tax harmonization in Ukraine in the context of the implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
6. Olefir, V. (2016). Results and prospects of raising excise tax rates on alcoholic beverages and tobacco products. Economist, 7, 8–11 [in Ukrainian]. raine. Business Inform, 6, 220–226 [in Ukrainian].
7. Pasichnyi, M. D. (2017). Th e Strategy of Excise Taxation of Tobacco Products in Ukraine. Business Inform, 6, 220–226 [in Ukrainian].
8. Sokolovska, A., & Rainova, L. (2017). Harmonization of excise tax on tobacco products. Economy and Forecasting, 2, 93–115 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.02.093
9. Alvarez & Marsal. (2019). Causes and Control of Illicit Tobacco (2nd Ed). Retrieved from www.alvarezandmarsal.com/sites/default/fi les/causes_and_control_of_illicit_tobacco_report_ed_2.pdf.
10. LaFaive, M. D., Drenkard, S., & Nesbit, T. (2018, April 13). Strong Link Between Cigarette Tax and Illegal Smuggling Rates. The negative and unintended consequences of excise taxes. Retrieved from www.mackinac.org/strong-link-between-cigarette-taxand-illegal-smuggling-rates.
11. Institute for Market Economics. (2019, May). Policy Note on Tobacco Excise Taxation and the Illegal Market. Retrieved from ime.bg/var/images/IME_policy_note_tobacco_2019_EN.pdf.
12. British American Tobacco. (2019, February). An analysis of the potential impacts of revising the minimum excise requirements in the European Tobacco Excise Directive. Retrieved from www.asktheeu.org/en/request/7509/response/24893/attach/4/6%20annex%20TED%20analysis%2027%2002%202019%20redacted.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1.
13. Institute for Market Economy. (2013, June 13). IME: 5.6% of Smokers in Bulgaria with Packs of Cigarettes Not Intended for the Local Market. Economic Policy Review, 105. Retrieved from ime.bg/en/articles/ime-56-of-smokers-in-bulgaria-with-packs-ofcigarettes-not-intended-for-the-local-market/.
14. European Commission. (2019, October 10). Taxation: Commission refers Hungary to the Court for failing to apply the minimum EU excise duty on cigarettes (Press release). Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/fi les/document/print/fi/ip_19_5991/IP_19_5991_EN.pdf.
15. BT / MTI. (2021, March 26). European court docket: Hungary doesn’t adhere to the rise in tobacco excise tax. Retrieved from taxattorney.review/european-court-dockethungary-doesnt-adhere-to-the-rise-in-tobacco-excise-tax/.
16. Sokolovska, A. M., & Petrakov, I. V. (2017). Harmonizing the Administration of Excise Tax in Ukraine in the Process of Implementation of the Association Agreement. Business Inform, 11, 389–394 [in Ukrainian].
17. Poliakov, M. (2021). Areas for improvement in the tobacco excise policy in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 5, 82–96 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.02.093
18. KPMG. (2020, June 19). Illicit cigarette consumption in the EU, UK, Norway and Switzerland. 2019 Results (Report). Retrieved from www.stopillegal.com/docs/default-source/external-docs/kpmg-report---2019-results/kpmg-report-illicit-cigaretteconsumption-in-the-eu-uk-norway-and-switzerland-2019-results.pdf.
19. Thomson Reuters. (2021, April 1). Tobacco taxation: European Commission launches public consultation on review of Tobacco Taxation Council Directive 2011/64/EU. Retrieved from uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-030-4341?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&fi rstPage=true.