Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 3/2022

№ 3/2022

Fìnansi Ukr. 2022 (3): 53–75
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.03.053

FINANCES OF THE INSTITUTIONAL SECTORS

KULYK Volodymyr 1

1SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-2795


The input-output scheme of the economy of Japan: System analysis and modelling of the inter-branch relations of the Ukraine’s economy


Introduction. The scheme input-output, used for the study of inter-branch reproduction of the economy of Japan, on system analysis and modelling of inter-branch relations of the economy of Ukraine is considered.
Problem Statement. The analysis and modelling of inter-branch relations of the Ukrainian economy is considered.
The purpose is to prepare aggregated the input-output tables of the Ukrainian economy and conduct a systematic analysis and modelling of inter-branch relations of the Ukrainian economy according to the scheme used by the Government of Japan.
Materials and Methods. The basis of the study was the official data of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine – the input-output tables in basic prices for 2013-2019. General scientific and special methods were used: analysis, synthesis, grouping, comparison, balance method, method of economic and mathematical modelling.
Results. According to the scheme used in Japan, a scheme of the turnover of the Ukrainian economy has been prepared, which follows from the input-output table for 2019. On the basis of input-output table of Ukraine and national accounts (2013-2019), aggregated input-output tables of the Ukrainian economy of 13 types of economic activity and 3 large sectors of the economy in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary sectors were prepared. The aggregation of sectors of the economy of Ukraine is substantively consistent with the aggregation of industries in the 13 sectoral model of input-output of the Japanese economy. Input-output tables are prepared in a competitive-import version. On the basis of aggregated input-output tables was analysed the development of sectors of the economy of Ukraine during 2013-2019. The classification of industries into key ones, with direct and inverse impact , etc. was carried out. Structural changes in GDP by final costs, production method and income categories were analysed as well as coefficients of value added, imports, influence. A visual assessment of the volatility of the GDP structure was carried out.
Conclusions. The analysis and modelling of inter-branch relations of the economy of Ukraine is carried out. A structural analysis of Ukraine's GDP within the framework of the prepared input-output table was carried out. Developments can be used for 1) scientific and educational purposes; 2) modelling of specific economic systems presented by the corresponding input-output tables; 3) conducting a comparative analysis of the economies of Ukraine and Japan within the framework of completely comparable the input-output tables.

Keywords:input-output scheme, economy of Japan, economy of Ukraine, economic cycle, sectoral structure of the economy, input-output table, types of economic activity, data aggregation, system analysis, production, modelling of inter-branch relations, GDP

JEL: C13, C67, D57, E23


Kulyk V. . The input-output scheme of the economy of Japan: System analysis and modelling of the inter-branch relations of the Ukraine’s economy / V. Kulyk // Фінанси України. - 2022. - № 3. - C. 53-75.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 53 - 75) DownloadDownloads :96
1. Kuboniva, M., Tabata, M., Tabata, S., & Hasebe, Y. (1991). Mathematical economics on a personal computer. Moscow: Finance and Statistics [in Russian].
2. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2021). Table Input–Output of Ukraine at Basic Prices. Retrieved from ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2021/zb/05/zb_tvv_2019.pdf [in Ukrainian].
3. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2021). National Accounts of Ukraine 2020. Kyiv. Retrieved from ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2022/zb/02/NRU_2020.pdf.
4. Leontief, W. W. (1936). Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States. The Review of Economic Statistics, 18 (3), 105–125. doi.org/10.2307/1927837
5. Rose, A., & Miernyk, W. (1989). Input-Output Analysis: The First Fifty Years. Economic Systems Research, 1 (2), 229–272. doi.org/10.1080/09535318900000016
6. Dietzenbacher, E., Lenzen, M., Los, B., Guan, D., Lahr, M. L., Sancho F. et al. (2013). Input-Output Analysis: The Next 25 Years. Economic Systems Research, 25 (4), 369–389. doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2013.846902
7. Leontief, W. W. (1937). Interrelation of Prices, Output, Savings, and Investment. The Review of Economic Statistics, 19 (3), 109–132. doi.org/10.2307/1927343
8. Leontief, W. W. (1941). The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1929: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9. Kuznets, S. (1941). The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1929. By Wassily W. Leontief. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1941. Pp. xi, 181. The Journal of Economic History, 1 (2), 246. doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700053158
10. Ahkhanhelskyi, Yu. S., & Kovalenko, I. I. (1998). Basics of cross-industry relationship modeling. Kyiv: RVU KIEMBS [in Ukrainian].
11. Ermoliev, Yu. M., & Yastremsky A. I. (1979). Stochastic models and methods in economic planning. Moscow: Science [in Russian].
12. Matveev, M. T., Ahkhangelskiy, Yu. S., Rybalchenko, V. P. et al. (1988). Models of the automated system of planned calculations of the State Planning Committee of the Republic. Kyiv : Naukova Dumka [in Russian].
13. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.). (2018). Current issues of financial management: global trends and national practice. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
14. Iefymenko, T. I. (2016). Fiscal and Monetary Security of National Economy. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
15. Gasanov, S. (2018). Research and development (R&D) in the national economy structure: international comparisons methodology. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 5–17 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2018.03.005
16. Gasanov, S. (2018). Research and development (R&D) in the national economy structure: connections with government functions. RFI Scientific Papers, 4, 5–16 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2018.04.005
17. Yastremskyi, O. I. (2018). Key and effective types of economic activity of Ukraine. Bulletin of Economic Science of Ukraine, 2, 177–182 [in Ukrainian].
18. NAS of Ukraine. (2022, March 31). Meeting of the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine on March 30, 2022. Retrieved from www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Messages/Pages/View.aspx?MessageID=8890 [in Ukrainian].

19. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2016). 2015 Input-Output Tables for Japan. Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000732915.pdf.
20. British Columbia. (n. d.). Main Assumptions of the B.C. Input-Output Model. Retrieved
from www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/data/statistics/economy/input-output-model / mainassumptions-bciom.
21. Kulyk, V. (2021). Critical infrastructure in the system of production and financial and economic relations “input-output”. Finance of Ukraine, 6, 89–108 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.06.089
22. Kulyk, V. (2021). Gross domestic product and critical infrastructure. RFI Scientific Papers, 2, 25–43 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2021.02.025
23. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2018). Methodological provisions for the organization of state statistical observation “Input-output table” (Order No. 236, November 1). Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/metod_polog/metod_doc/2018/236/mp_tvv.pdf [in Ukrainian].
24. European Commission, & Eurostat. (2013). European system of accounts – ESA 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5925693/KS-02-13-269-EN.PDF/44cd9d01-bc64-40e5-bd40-d17df0c69334.
25. Kulyk, V. (2021). Japan experience: system analysis and modelling inter-industry relations. Finance of Ukraine, 1, 83–102 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.01.083
26. Kulyk, V. (2020). Analysis of Japan’s and Ukraine’s sectoral structure of the economy within the framework of the aggregated input-output models. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 109–127 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2020.03.109
27. Kulyk, V. (2021). Modeling of financial support for the development of critical infrastructure objects. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 103–126 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.11.103
28. Studenski, P. (1968). The Income of Nations (Theory, Measurement, and Analysis: Past and Present). Moscow: Statistics [in Russian].
29. Yastremskyi, O. (2014). Comparative analysis of the structure of national economies: Ukraine (2005, 2011 years) – Poland (2005 year). Foreign Trade: Economics, Finance, Law, 1, 112–119 [in Ukrainian].