Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 6/2022

№ 6/2022

Fìnansi Ukr. 2022 (6): 7–32
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.06.007

FINANCES OF THE INSTITUTIONAL SECTORS

DANYLENKO Anatolij 1, VENGER Vitalii 2

1Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-5831
2SE “Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1018-0909


Development of real sector of Ukrainian economy in the framework of the post-war recovery


Introduction. Russian invasion has already caused – and will likely cause more – losses for Ukraine overall and its real sector in particular. They come on top of structural problems that had been accumulating in Ukraine since the dawn of its independence. European experience suggests a model for comprehensive solution for post-war recovery and structural transformation on the basis of a plan that is coordinated with international donors and backed by the state.
Problem Statement. Post-war economic recovery coupled with simultaneous resolution of legacy industry problems, under pro-active engagement of the government and with support from international partners
Purpose. The aim of the study is to determine the role of the government in organizing work on modernization of existing and establishment of new enterprises that can arranged with participation from international leaders in respective productions with regard to their economic interests under post-war recovery of Ukrainian economy.
Methods. The study is based on scientific works, methodological studies of leading Ukrainian and foreign scientists. The study was conducted with help of critical and scientific analysis, scientific generalization and systematization methods, induction and deduction for establishing relationships of cause and effect between domestic and external factors. Results of the study, conclusions and recommendations are grounded on integral approach.
Results. After Ukraine gained its independence, its real sector has accumulated a number of problems because of distorted application of market mechanisms and inadequate support from public management. Russian invasion caused ruining of infrastructure hubs, large and small enterprises, including key companies for certain industries, and large-scale flows of refugees, inter alia abroad. Temporary relocation of enterprises, which made a partial production recovery possible, was a temporary response to the invasion. In the aftermath of the hostilities, Ukraine will have to mend both pre-war deficiencies and results of treacherous Russian aggression. However, this requires massive resources, which Ukraine under its current (or even pre-war) condition does not possess. Global experience offers mechanisms for raising necessary funds from other countries for a post-war recovery. Primarily, the article speaks of the Marshall Plan. In order to use such resources in an efficient way, we need to develop measures for reconstruction of Ukrainian economy at a new qualitative level that would rely on active support from the government.
Conclusions. A success in the post-war recovery of Ukrainian economy, inter alia with support from other countries, is only possible under active government engagement under application of project approach model. It allows for effective implementation of innovative projects with active state facilitation and establishing framework conditions, as well as meeting external investors’ needs. A more pro-active role of the state in promotion of higher efficiency of the economy should be provided for in the law.

Keywords:industry, business groups, export, import, public debt, foreign currency, budget, households, credit, insurance funds

JEL: E22, F21, G11, H54


Danylenko A. . Development of real sector of Ukrainian economy in the framework of the post-war recovery / A. . Danylenko, V. Venger // Фінанси України. - 2022. - № 6. - C. 7-32.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 32) DownloadDownloads :186
1. Smith, A. (2018). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Kyiv: Nash format [in Ukrainian].
2. Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). Whither reform? Ten years of the transition. Retrieved from www8.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/sites/jstiglitz/files/1999_4_Wither_Reform.pdf.
3. Keyns, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Retrieved from www.files.ethz.ch/isn/125515/1366_KeynesTheoryofEmployment.pdf.
4. Lukinov, I. (1999). Methods and means of state regulation of the transition period economy. Economy of Ukraine, 5, 8–11 [in Ukrainian].
5. Heyets, V. (2020). The phenomenon of instability as a challenge to economic development. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.403.456
6. Heyets, V. (2020). To the issue of applying the approaches of the “Marshall Plan” for Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 4, 6–11. Retrieved from nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/EkUk_2015_4_3.
7. Grytsenko, A. (2017). Logical and historical bases of cardinal economic changes and transition to reconstructive development. Economy of Ukraine, 5-6, 39–57. Retrieved from nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/EkUk_2017_5-6_6 [in Ukrainian].
8. Grytsenko, A. A. (Ed.). (2021). Formation of the institutional architecture of the information and network economy. Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. SI “Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
9. Ierokhin, S. A. (2004). The main principles of the formation of the strategy of socio-economic development of Ukraine. Actual Problems of Economics, 12, 7–24 [in Ukrainian].
10. Zvieriakov, M. (2010). Liberal idea and modernization of the economy of Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 7, 11–21 [in Ukrainian].
11. Mantsurov, I. H. (2006). Statistics of economic growth and competitiveness of the country. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
12. Kovalenko, A. O. (2018). Strategic planning of sustainable development of Ukraine. Kyiv: ProfKnyha [in Ukrainian].
13. Marchenko, S. (2022). Strategic public finance governance: European integration course, international trends, national peculiarities. Finance of Ukraine, 1, 7–26 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.01.007
14. Iefymenko, T. (2018). Development of the Ukrainian economy in the context of strengthening security in the Black Sea region. Finance of Ukraine, 6, 7–18 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.06.007
15. Iefymenko, T. (2021). Crisis transformations of socio-economic systems. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 7–20 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.11.007
16. Iefymenko, T. (2020). Fiscal regulation of sustainable national economic growth. Nauka innov, 16 (5), 21–38 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/scin16.05.021
17. Iefymenko, T. (2020). Financial management transformations and sustainable development of the national economy. Economy of Ukraine, 7, 5–13 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.07.005
18. Gasanov, S. (2017). Uncertainty in economics and the economy of uncertainty. Finance of Ukraine, 12, 23–34. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2017.12.023
19. Gasanov, S. (2017). Structural policy and public finance under institutional uncertainty. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 7–18. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2017.03.007
20. Gasanov, S. (2018). Fiscal rules and fiscal responsibility: economic security context. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 7–23. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.03.007
21. Kudryashov, V. (2018). Imperatives and risks of the state borrowings’ accumulation. Economy of Ukraine, 6, 26–43 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2018.06.026
22. Kudrjashov, V. (2021). Critical infrastructure and its functions. RFI Scientific Papers, 2, 5–24 [in Ukrainian].doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2021.02.005
23. Kudryashov, V. (2022). Infrastructure financing in the course of overcoming wartime consequences. Finance of Ukraine, 4, 46–66 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.04.046
24. Danylenko, A. (2019). The state of Ukraine’s real economy: trends over the years of independence. Finance of Ukraine, 5, 7–36 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.05.007
25. Danylenko, A. (2019). Investment projects and their role upon of industrial development of Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 6, 7–22 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.06.007
26. Danylenko, A. (2019). Financing and economic ways for promoting an increase in competitive production. Finance of Ukraine, 7, 7–34 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.07.007
27. Danylenko, A. (2020). Financial risks: their essence and estimation by Ukrainian enterprises. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 7–22 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.03.007
28. Danylenko, A. (2020). Enhancing the state’s role in managing financial risks. Finance of Ukraine, 5, 7–28 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.05.007
29. Danylenko, A. (2021). Specifics of investment policy in the Ukraine real sector. Finance of Ukraine, 4, 24–47 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.04.024
30. Chaus, V. S. (2015). Regulation of the national economy under Russian terrorism against Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU. Economic Series, 25 (7), 121–126 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15421/40250719
31. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (2022, March 31). Meeting of the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine on March 30, 2022. Retrieved from www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Messages/Pages/View.aspx?MessageID=8890 [in Ukrainian].
32. Kyiv School of Economics. (2022, May 27). The total amount of direct infrastructure damage already exceeds $105.5 billion. Retrieved from kse.ua/ua/about-the-school/news/zagalna-suma-pryamih-zbitkiv-infrastrukturi-vzhe-perevishhuye-105-5-mlrd [in Ukrainian].
33. Hordiienko, O., & Shevchuk, S. (2022, April 12). The loss of half of exports, the destruction of industrial giants and a blow to the state budget. The economy passed the first month of the war. What's next? The main thing from the CES report. Forbes.ua. Retrieved from forbes.ua/inside/vtrata-polovini-eksportu-ruynuvannya-promislovikh-gigantiv-ta-udar-po-derzhbyudzhetu-ekonomika-proyshla-pershiy-misyats-viyni-shcho-dali-golovne-zi-zvitu-tses-12042022-5408 [in Ukrainian].
34. NISS. (2022, April 27). Modern threats to industrial safety in the industry of Ukraine. Retrieved from niss.gov.ua/news/komentari-ekspertiv/suchasni-zahrozy-vyrobnychiy-bezpetsi-v-promyslovosti-ukrayiny [in Ukrainian].
35. Hordiichuk, D. (2022, May 19). Direct damage to Ukraine caused by the enemy is approaching 100 billion dollars. Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/news/2022/05/19/687210/ [in Ukrainian].
36. Financial Club. (2022, May 11). Almost 5 million Ukrainians lost their jobs because of the war. Retrieved from finclub.net/ua/news/maizhe-5-mln-ukraintsiv-vtratyly-robotu-cherez-viinu.html [in Ukrainian].
37. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022, May 19). The business relocation program is an effective tool for creating a reliable economic rear. Retrieved from www.rada.gov.ua/news/razom/223016.html [in Ukrainian].
38. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2022). About the peculiarities of the work of the joint-stock company "Ukrposhta" in the conditions of martial law (Decree No. 305, March 17). Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-osoblivosti-roboti-akcionernogo-tovaristva-ukrposhta-v-umovah-voyennogo-stanu-305 [in Ukrainian].
39. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2022). On the approval of the plan of emergency measures for the relocation, if necessary, of the production facilities of business entities from the territories where hostilities are taking place and/or there is a threat of hostilities to a safe territory (Decree No. 246-r, March 25). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/246-2022-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
40. Radio Svoboda. (2022, May 28). More than 600 enterprises completed the relocation due to the war - the Ministry of Economy. Retrieved from www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news-biznes-relokatsiya-viyna/31873028.html [in Ukrainian].
41. Novikov, V. (2022, March 16). What model for rebuilding the economy after the war does Ukraine need. Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2022/03/16/684116/ [in Ukrainian].
42. Wikipedia. (n. d.). Marshall Plan. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan.
43. Kravchuk, Yu. B. (2014). Economic history. Kharkiv: KhNUVZ [in Ukrainian].
44. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2015). On amendments to the Budget Code of Ukraine regarding state investment projects (Act No. 288-VIII, April 7). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/288-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
45. SI "Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine", & National Institute for Strategic Studies under the President of Ukraine. (2014, September 25). Proposals for the organization of the new Marshall Plan. "Marshall Plan": experience and lessons for Ukraine (Materials of the round table) . Retrieved from ief.org.ua/?p=4203 [in Ukrainian].
46. Bohdan, T. (2022, April 25). Reconstruction of the economy: directions, levers, institutions. Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2022/04/25/686208/ [in Ukrainian].
47. Komar, N. (2012). Directions of providing international financial and technical assistance within the framework of the Marshall Plan. Herald of Economics, 1, 172–181. Retrieved from visnykj.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/visnykj/article/view/412/424 [in Ukrainian].
48. Economic revival through the industrial development of Ukraine. (2020). Kharkiv: Full color [in Ukrainian].
49. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
50. National Bank of Ukraine. (n. d.). Retrieved from bank.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
51. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2011, February 16). Directive 2011/7/EU on combating late payment in commercial transactions. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32011L0007.
52. Venger, V. (2015). The development of Ukraine's mining and metallurgy companies within business groups. Economy and Forecasting, 1, 64–75 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/eip2015.01.064