Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 7/2022

№ 7/2022

Fìnansi Ukr. 2022 (7): 57–69
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.07.057

FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC REGULATION

DYBA Mykhailo 1, GERNEGO Iuliia 2, SHKODA Tetiana 3

1Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-9572
2Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/54148192200
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4929-0411
3Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1016-4853


The potential of financing the reconstruction of the Ukrainian economy taking into account ESG criteria


Introduction. In 2022, in the conditions of the Russian military invasion of Ukraine, a security component acquires special importance also at the global level. In Ukraine, there is a need to restore and rebuild the economy, based on new technologies, alternative raw materials and with the formation of new chains of interaction. After all, it is the qualitative renewal that will contribute to maintaining the position of the national economy on international markets, where ESG criteria are taken into account when making investment decisions.
Problem Statement. Assessment of the prospects of attracting financial resources for the purposes of comprehensive recovery of the economy of Ukraine, taking into account the priorities determined at the national level.
Purpose. To substantiate proposals for the selection of possible sources of financing for the reconstruction of the economy of Ukraine, namely, qualitative recovery, based on the preservation of the appropriate level of environmental, social and managerial components, to determine possible ways of integrating ESG criteria into the development of the domestic economy.
Methods. General scientific and special methods were used, in particular: scientific abstraction and epistemological (content) analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, analogies and systematization, system-structural analysis, expert evaluation method, index and grouping methods.
Results. The article examines the directions of post-war economic reconstruction in the world, in particular, the Marshall Plan for Western Europe after the Second World War and the case of the reconstruction of South Korea after the Korean War. In addition, the study emphasizes the directions and priorities of the recovery of the economy of Ukraine. Given the possibilities of combining recovery and ESG criteria, it is proposed to consider specific funds within the framework of the pyramid of economic recovery of Ukraine. In particular, the possibilities of financing through the efforts of state funds, examples of the creation of business funds and successful foreign experience of grant financing and crowdfunding are determined.
Conclusions. Reconstruction of the national economy is possible due to the transition of basic economic and social processes to a qualitatively new level. For this, it is important to combine financing opportunities for ESG projects in Ukraine at different levels, taking into account international experience. The study of the financing potential of the reconstruction of the economy of Ukraine, taking into account the ESG criteria, makes it possible to draw a conclusion about the activation of socio-economic development and future growth, in particular, possible directions and sources of stimulation in the context of the implementation of ESG projects by the efforts of domestic stakeholders. Thus, the integration of ESG principles into the processes of post-war economic recovery of Ukraine is inevitable.

Keywords:project financing, social investments, environmental initiatives, social initiatives, management initiatives, ESG, reconstruction of the economy

JEL: G21, G23, G24, H53, Q20, Q50


DYBA M. . The potential of financing the reconstruction of the Ukrainian economy taking into account ESG criteria / M. . DYBA, I. Gernego , T. Shkoda // Фінанси України. - 2022. - № 7. - C. 57-69.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 57 - 69) DownloadDownloads :161
1. Vijaya, R. (2021, August 11). Credit ratings are punishing poorer countries for investing more in health care during the pandemic. The Conversation. Retrieved from theconversation.com/credit-ratings-are-punishing-poorer-countries-for-investing-more-in-health-care-during-the-pandemic-165298.
2. Dyba, M., & Gernego, Iu. (2022). ESG principles applied in forming the system of international ratings. Finance of Ukraine, 1, 90–102 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.01.090
3. Fink, L. (n. d.). The Power of Capitalism. BlackRock. Retrieved from www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry-fink-ceo-letter.
4. UNDP. (n. d.). What are the Sustainable Development Goals? Retrieved from www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals.
5. Maciaszczyk, P., Dyba, M., & Gernego, Iu. (2019). Strategies of Human Development in the Context of Global Digital Change. Economic Studies Journal, 28 (5), 10–24.
6. JP Morgan Chase & Co. (2020). Environmental, Social &Governance Report. Retrieved from www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmc/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/documents/jpmc-esg-report-2020.pdf.
7. CFA Institute. (2019). ESG integration in Europe, the Middle east, and Africa: markets, practices, and data. Retrieved from www.cfainstitute.org/-/media/documents/survey/esg-integration-in-emea.pdf.
8. Citigroup. (2020). Environmental, Social and Governance Report. Retrieved from www.citigroup.com/citi/about/esg/download/2020/Global-ESG-Report-2020.pdf?ieNocache=394.
9. Lim, W. M. (2022). The sustainability pyramid: A hierarchical approach to greater sustainability and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals with implications for marketing theory, practice, and public policy. Australasian Marketing Journal, 30 (2), 142–150. doi.org/10.1177/18393349211069152
10. Kanyamibwa, S. (1998). Impact of war on conservation: Rwandan environment and wildlife in agony. Biodiversity & Conservation, 7 (11), 1399–1406. doi.org/10.1023/A:1008880113990
11. Sheather, J. (2022). As Russian troops cross into Ukraine, we need to remind ourselves of the impact of war on health. BMJ, 376, o499. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o499
12. Zaliska, O., Oleshchuk, O., Forman, R., & Mossialos, E. (2022). Health impacts of the Russian invasion in Ukraine: need for global health action. The Lancet, 399 (10334), 1450–1452. doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00615-8
13. Moisson, E. (2022, March 11). ESG investors accused of ‘failing’ over Russia. Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/fad3e241-08fa-47fc-bdbd-32dd5b72403d.
14. Diachenko, S., & Bulana, O. (2022, May 27). How can we rebuild Ukraine. Successful world cases of post-war recovery. Ukrinform. Retrieved from www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-economy/3493522-ak-nam-vidbuduvati-ukrainu-uspisni-svitovi-kejsi-povoennogo-vidnovlenna.html [in Ukrainian].
15. OECD. (2021). ESG Investing and Climate Transition: Market Practices, Issues and Policy Considerations. Paris. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-investing-and-climate-transition-market-practices-issues-and-policy-considerations.pdf.
16. Brenner, J. (2022). Some ideas for a post-war recovery of Ukrainian cities. Urban Research & Practice. doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2097646
17. Hordiichuk, D. (2022, July 4). Ukraine presented a $750 billion recovery plan: what post-war reconstruction will look like. Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/news/2022/07/4/688833/ [in Ukrainian].
18. Duginets, G., & Nizheiko, K. (2022). International technical support in Ukraine’s postwar reconstruction. Cientia Fructuosa, 143(3), 36–49 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2022(143)02
19. Government Portal. (n. d.). Recovery Funds of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/gromadskosti/fondi-vidnovlennya-ukrayini [in Ukrainian].
20. Svyrydenko, Yu. (2022, April 21). How will Ukraine recover? Ukrainian Pravda. Retrieved from www.pravda.com.ua/columns/2022/04/21/7341214/ [in Ukrainian].
21. Government Portal. (2022, July 22). Sections of the Recovery Plan of Ukraine have been made public for comment. Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/news/opryliudneno-dlia-komentuvannia-rozdily-planu-vidnovlennia-ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
22. World Energy Council. (n. d.). World Energy Trilemma Index. Retrieved from www.worldenergy.org/transition-toolkit/world-energy-trilemma-index.
23. KPMG in Ukraine. (2021). The view of business leaders in Ukraine 2021. Retrieved from assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ua/pdf/2021/11/Ukrainian-Business-Leaders-Outlook-2021.pdf [in Ukrainian].
24. Gernego, Iu. O. (2019). The Criteria for the Success of a Grant Application in the Context of Increasing the Role of Socially Oriented Business. Business Inform, 7, 260–266 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2019-7-260-266
25. UNDP. (2022, January 24). UNDP is a partner of the National Bank in the development of sustainable financing in Ukraine. Retrieved from cutt.ly/2ZuaYop [in Ukrainian].