№ 9/2022

Fìnansi Ukr. 2022 (9): 7–21https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.09.007

TAX POLICY

IVANYTSKA Olga ¹

¹National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5505-8849

International cooperation in the field of combating tax avoidance and implementation of the Common Reporting Standard

Introduction. The strengthening of globalization processes caused significant changes in the international taxation system. The negative consequences of globalization include large-scale tax avoidance and erosion of the tax base. These phenomena caused systematic steps by international organizations in the direction of substantiating the scope of action for the realisation of the process of automatic exchange of information on financial accounts in accordance with the General Reporting Standard and other documents. Ukraine has joined the initiatives of the international community and is consistently implementing measures for their adaptation and implementation. At the same time, there are some limitations in the application of the developed standards, which can be used by unscrupulous taxpayers as a loophole for harmful tax practices.
Problem Statement. The scientific basis for the implementation of the BEPS Plan, in particular, the introduction of the process of automatic exchange of information on financial accounts in accordance with the General Reporting Standard.
Purpose. Identification of key milestones in the formation and implementation of the BEPS Plan, as well as identification of some limitations and shortcomings in the provisions and procedures of automatic exchange of information on financial accounts, which may lead to abuse, improper actions, violations of confidentiality and security.
Methods: analysis and synthesis, comparative analysis, analytical, implementation of a systemic approach to the study of issues
Results. The systemic steps of international organizations regarding the implementation of the BEPS Countermeasures Plan and the development of relevant decisions and documents were analyzed. Some limitations in the application of the developed solutions, which can be used by unscrupulous taxpayers as a loophole for the continuation of harmful tax practices, have been identified. The actions of the Ukrainian government regarding joining the international community in the matter of automatic exchange of information on financial accounts are outlined.
Conclusions. Therefore, systemic measures for the implementation of the BEPS Countermeasures Plan provide for the formation of a methodology for the application of mechanisms for such countermeasures, in particular principles, directions, tools, procedures and technologies that make impossible or complicate the processes of blurring the tax base and avoiding taxation. For this purpose, key international organizations, in particular the OECD, the Council of Europe, the G20 and the G8, have decided and prepared a number of documents, as well as standards, model and standard agreements to involve national governments in the implementation of joint efforts to counter BEPS, among which a special place is occupied by the Model Competent Authority Agreement (CAA) for automatic exchange of information and Common Reporting Standard. At the same time, when implementing agreements and standards, risks arise due to: avoidance of reporting by some financial institutions and other subjects of legal relations; breach of confidentiality; departure of some countries from general practice and standard procedures, etc. While developing a platform for legal, administrative, financial and economic, technical and technological support for the implementation of BEPS countermeasures, Ukraine should take into account the lessons of negative experience and prevent limitations of the specified standards.

Keywords:Common Reporting Standard (CRS), Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information (MCAA), tax avoidance, erosion of the tax base, BEPS, model agreement for effective exchange of information on taxation matters, Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance on Taxation Matters

JEL: Н26, Н87

IVANYTSKA O. . International cooperation in the field of combating tax avoidance and implementation of the Common Reporting Standard / O. . IVANYTSKA // Фінанси України. - 2022. - № 9. - C. 7-21.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 21)

Download

Downloads :139

1. OECD. (2013). Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/9789264202719-en
2. OECD. (2014). Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Information in Tax Matters. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/9789264216525-en
3. Riedel, N. (2018). Quantifying International Tax Avoidance: A Review of the Academic Literature. Review of Economics, 69 (2), 169–181. doi.org/10.1515/roe-2018-0004
4. Heckemeyer, J. H., & Overesch, M. (2017). Multinationals’ Profit Response to Tax Differentials: Effect Size and Shifting Channels. Canadian Journal of Economics, 50 (4), 965–994. doi.org/10.1111/caje.12283
5. Casi, E., Spengel, C, & Stage, B. (2020). Cross-border tax evasion after the common reporting standard: Game over? ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, 18-036. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3245144
6. Brekhov, S., S., & Korotun, V. I. (Eds.). (2017). Countering aggressive tax planning: global experience and challenges for Ukraine. Kyiv: Alerta [in Ukrainian].
7. Lovinsha, L. (Ed.). (2019). Reporting of multinational enterprises as a tool to counter aggressive tax planning. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
8. Ivanytska, O., & Koshchuk, T. (2021). Methodological problems of BEPS analysis. Finance of Ukraine, 6, 55–71 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.06.055
9. Oleynikova, L., & Dolzhenko, I. (2020). Improvement of tax control in Ukraine on the basis of implementing BEPS plan tools and automatic information exchange. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 79–94 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2020.03.079
10. Oliynyk, Ya., & Kucheriava, M. (2021). Assessment of Ukraine’s readiness for international automatic exchange of information for tax purposes. Finance of Ukraine, 2, 85–97 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.02.085
11. OECD. (2018). Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Information in Tax Matters (Implementation Handbook) (2nd Ed). Paris. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of-tax-information/implementation-handbook-standard-for-automatic-exchange-of-financial-information-in-tax-matters.pdf.
12. OECD Global Forum on transparency and Ex-change of Information for Tax Purposes. (2022, May 18). AEOI: Status of commitments (101 jurisdictions have committed). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/transparency/AEOI-commitments.pdf.
13. NV Business. (2021, September 5). Hello, KIK. Five questions to Hetmantsev about what and when will change in the tax practice of Ukraine. Retrieved from biz.nv.ua/ukr/experts/podatki-kik-i-mizhnarodni-standarti-blic-interv-yu-z-danilom-getmancevim-novini-ukrajini-50181749.html [in Ukrainian].
14. Nexus. (2019, August 31). International automatic exchange of information. Retrieved from www.nexus.ua/mezhdunarodnyj-avtomaticheskij-obmen-nalogovoj-informatsiej [in Russian].
15. Holian, L. (2022, February 8). Legislative changes that private customers should be aware of. Legal newspaper online. Retrieved from yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/podatkova-praktika/zakonodavchi-zmini-pro-yaki-varto-znati-privatnim-klientam.html [in Ukrainian].
16. Deloitte. (2019, December 10). The Verkhovna Rada passed laws to implement reporting for FATCA and CRS. Retrieved from www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/press-room/tax-and-legal-alerts/2019/2019-12-10-reporting-for-fatca.html [in Ukrainian].
17. The ISO, 27000 Directory An Introduction to ISO 27001, ISO 27002….ISO 27008. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.27000.org.
18. OECD. (2017). Common Reporting Standard User Guide. Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters (2nd Ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/9789264267992-10-en
19. Commercial Banking – Poland. (n. d.). CRS overview. Retrieved from www.crs.hsbc.com/en/cmb/poland.
20. Law & Trust. (2017, August 17). Frequently Asked Questions about the Unified Reporting Standard. Retrieved from lawstrust.com/ua/news/crs-faq [in Russian].