Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 11/2022

№ 11/2022

Fìnansi Ukr. 2022 (11): 7–18
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.11.007

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

IEFYMENKO Tetiana 1

1SESE “Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-3959


Information and fiscal space to strengthen the resilience of the economy in conditions of sustainable development


Introduction. The European integration vector of Ukraine's policy in the form of EU member state candidacy will require ensuring a high level of economic resilience both in the conditions of martial law and after the victory over the aggressor.
Problem Statement. The scale of turmoil as a result of the war in Ukraine is growing both globally and regionally. For the successful development of the country, it is necessary to harmonize domestic and international measures to counter the irrational use of financial resources in the economy, as well as the large-scale outflow of capital abroad; to prevent corruption activity and administrative violations in contractual relations.
Purpose. Development of directions for strengthening countermeasures against economic instability based on the avoidance of information asymmetry in the fiscal space, unification of stability and resilience indicators based on the application of accounting and financial reporting standards.
Material. Despite the unprecedented consequences of a full-scale Russian invasion in 2022, our country during the war does not witness irreversible violations of macroeconomic and financial stability. Economic and political shocks in the conditions of the internationalization of the fiscal space pose new tasks for management, putting forward requirements for accounting and financial reporting. To satisfy them innovations are necessary in shaping indicators, collecting information, summarizing and interpreting it.
Results. The use of databases formed with the help of international standards will make it possible to implement the same indicators of stress resilience of socio-economic systems. The format of global information exchange, provided by the UN initiative as part of voluntary national reviews of the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, aims to unify reporting, because there is a problem of comparability of indicators due to the use of different methodologies. Search the ways to resolve this is in the center of attention of various platforms of high-level meetings, accompanied by the updating of relevant international institutions.
Conclusions. The institutional and financial infrastructure of Ukraine withstood the blow of the calamity. As part of the sustainable, progressive restoration of the Ukrainian nation in 2023 and beyond, the goal-setting of the state system will be focused on increasing the resilience of economic agents of all forms of ownership. On the basis of information standards, it is necessary to improve competitive institutions that contribute to the neutralization of deliberate actions of subjects of the global economy, shadow structures that disregard the rules and norms of the national socio-political system, in particular in the fiscal sphere.

Keywords:the European integration vector of Ukraine, information asymmetry, accounting and financial reporting standards; fiscal space; resilience of the economy, indicators of sustainable development

JEL: D81, D82, M41, Q01


Iefymenko T. . Information and fiscal space to strengthen the resilience of the economy in conditions of sustainable development / T. . Iefymenko // Фінанси України. - 2022. - № 11. - C. 7-18.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 18) DownloadDownloads :125
1. European press roundup. (2016, September 7). G-20 want to get global economy back on track. Retrieved from www.eurotopics.net/en/165601/g20-want-to-get-global-economy-back-on-track#.
2. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from daccess-ods.un.org/access.nsf/Get?OpenAgent&DS=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.
3. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2022). The Basic Skills Gap. Finance & Development, 6. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2022/06/basic-skills-gap-hanushek-woessmann.
4. Marchenko, S. (2022). Strategic public finance governance: European integration course, international trends, national peculiarities. Finance of Ukraine, 1, 7–26. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.01.007
5. Seyf, A. (1997). Globalization and the Crisis of the International Economy. Global Society,11 (3), 299–324. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.01.007
6. Soros, G. (2003). The Alchemy of Finance. Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley.
7. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: Los Angeles: University of California Press. Retrieved from www.communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8/10887248/the_constitution_of_society.pdf.
8. Luhmann, N. (1996). Social Systems (1st Ed.). Stanford University Press.
9. Irwin, T. (2007). Government Guarantees: Allocating and Valuing Risk in Privately Financed Infrastructure Projects. World Bank Publications. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.01.007
10. Farquharson, E., De Mästle, T. C., Yescombe, E. R., & Encinas, J. (2011). How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets. World Bank Publications. doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7863-2
11. Yescombe, E. R. (2013). Principles of Project Finance (2nd Ed.). Academic Press. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-391058-5.00002-3
12. International Framework. 2013/2021 comparison. (2021). Retrieved from www.integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Framework-comparison-2013-to-2021.pdf.
13. Stigler, G. (1961). The Economics of Information. Journal of Political Economy, 69 (3), 213–225. doi.org/10.1086/258464
14. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (4), 297–323. doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
15. OECD. (n. d.). Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/beps/.
16. International Monetary Fund. (2022). World Economic Outlook: Countering the Cost-of-Living Crisis. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2022/10/11/world-economic-outlook-october-2022.
17. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020). On introducing changes to the Tax Code of Ukraine on the improvement of tax administration, lifting technical and logical incoherence’s in tax legislation (Act No. 466-IX, January 16). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/466-20#Text.
18. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2019). On ratification of Multilateral Convention on implementing the measures concerning taxation agreements with the purpose of countering base erosion and tax evasion (Act No. 2692-VIII, February 28). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2692-19#Text.
19. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022). On introducing the changes to the Tax Code of Ukraine on the implementation of international standard of automated exchange of information on financial accounts (Draft Law No. 8131, October 17). Retrieved from itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/40674. 20. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022).
20. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022). On adoption as the base of the Bill of the Law of Ukraine on introducing change to the Tax Code of Ukraine on the implementation of international standard of automated exchange of information on financial accounts (Decree No. 2770-IX, November 16). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2770-20#Text.
21. OECD. (2021). Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/beps/statement-on-a-two-pillar-solution-to-address-the-tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-october-2021.pdf.
22. Members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/beps/inclusive-framework-on-beps-composition.pdf.
23. EU Council (2011, November 11). Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Retrieved eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:306:0041:0047:EN:PDF.
24. Barrios, S., Figari, F., Gandullia, L., & Riscado, S. (2016). The fiscal and equity impact of tax expenditures in the European Union. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/default/files/jrc104176.pdf.
25. Fiscal Affairs Department. (2019). Tax Expenditure Reporting and Its Use in Fiscal Management: A Guide for Developing Economies. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/Fiscal-Affairs-Department-How-To-Notes/Issues/2019/03/27/Tax-Expenditure-Reporting-and-Its-Use-in-Fiscal-Management-A-Guide-for-Developing-Economies-46676.
26. European Parliament resolution on sustainable finance (2018/2007(INI)) (2018, May 29). Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0215_EN.html.
27. Council Conclusions on the Deepening of the Capital Markets Union. (2019, December 5). Retrieved from www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/12/05/capital-markets-union-council-sets-objectives-for-the-deepening-of-the-project/.
28. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2021). Proposal for a Directive amending Directive 2013/34/EU, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0189.
29. Communication from the Commission – Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth (COM(2018)097 final).
30. European Parliament resolution on sustainable corporate governance (2020/2137(INI). (2020, December).
31. WEF. (2020). Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism Towards Common Metrics and Consistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IBC_Measuring_Stakeholder_Capitalism_Report_2020.pdf.
32. UNCTAD. (2021). Guidance on core indicators for entity reporting on contribution towards implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from isar.unctad.org/2021/02/08/gci/.
33. GRI. (2019). GRI 207: TAX 2019: A new global standard for public reporting on tax. Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org/media/sfcpcrt4/gri-207-tax-standard-2019-factsheet.pdf.
34. OECD. (n. d.). Guidance on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/ctp/beps-action-13-guidance-implementation-tp-documentation-cbc-reporting.pdf.
35. ISSB. (2022, March). Exposure Draft ED/2022/S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. Retrieved from www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/general-sustainability-related-disclosures/exposure-draft-ifrs-s1-general-requirements-for-disclosure-of-sustainability-related-financial-information.pdf
36. ISSB. (2022, March). Exposure Draft ED/2022/S2 Climate-related Disclosures. Retrieved from www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/climate-related-disclosures/issb-exposure-draft-2022-2-climate-related-disclosures.pdf.