№ 12/2022

Fìnansi Ukr. 2022 (12): 7–21https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.12.007

PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT

GASANOV Sergіi ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-0419

International standards of public debt statistics and their implementation in the public finance management system of Ukraine

Introduction. Theoretical-methodological and methodical substantiation of approaches to the formation, structuring and systematization of statistical information on the public debt of Ukraine in accordance with international standards is of fundamental importance for improving the quality of strategic management of public finances. The implementation of international standards for statistical measurement and diagnostics of public debt makes it possible to objectively monitor the parameters of debt sustainability and bring public financial management tools closer to the best examples of world practice. The implementation of international standards for public debt statistics is an important element in ensuring the transparency of public finances, allowing to optimize cooperation with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other international financial organizations. Institutional and regulatory implementation of international standards of public debt statistics will allow to increase the level of reasonableness of fiscal risk assessments and the predictability of debt policy in the medium term, to reduce the negative impact of political cycles and economic fluctuations on the state of public finances. In accordance with the Association Agreement of Ukraine with the EU and with Ukraine acquiring the status of a candidate country for joining the EU, the issue of approximation of national legislation to EU legislation, including regarding the national debt, has acquired extraordinary political, economic and social importance, especially in the conditions of external aggression of the Russian Federation and the tasks of the post-war reconstruction of the country’s economy. According to the Strategy of Economic Security of Ukraine for the period until 2025, the question of the acceptability of the level and sources of financing the public debt is one of the key factors for ensuring the financial security of the country.
Problem Statement. Interrelated components of the issues of this article are highlighted: 1) institutional coverage of public finances and public debt; 2) the system of public finance management in the context of mutual compliance of objects, subjects and methods of such management; 3) standardized methodology for quantitative statistical measurement of public debt as part of public finances; 4) implementation of international standards of public debt statistics into the national system of public finance management.
The purpose is to substantiate conceptual and methodological approaches and recommendations regarding the improvement of statistical measurement and systematization of information on the public debt of Ukraine in accordance with international standards; making changes and additions to the first part of Article 2 of the Budget Code of Ukraine regarding the public debt.
Methodology and methods. The general environment of analysis is public finances; the unifying shell is the public finance management system; the object is public debt; the subject is international standards of public debt statistics; the expected result is proposals and recommendations regarding the implementation of the specified standards with the aim of eliminating the legal uncertainty of the meaning of the term “public debt” in the first part of Article 2 of the Budget Code of Ukraine, bringing it into line with the norms of EU legislation, which will allow for reasonable quantitative measurements and international comparisons of public debt in Ukraine and EC countries. Methods of comparative qualitative and quantitative analysis, structural-institutional and structural-functional analysis, theoretical generalizations are applied; basic methodological principles and methodological approaches contained in the international System of National Accounts 2008, the European System of National and Regional Accounts 2010, other international standards related to public finance and public debt statistics.
Results. In Ukrainian legislation (budgetary, tax, financial) there is no clear definition of the meaning of the term “Public Finance”. The phenomenon of “fundamental uncertainty” has in many respects an ancient and systemic nature. This also applies to the term “public debt” in the first part of Article 2 of the Budget Code of Ukraine. The most complete understanding of public finances in a broad sense, which the author adheres to: “Public finance are the finance of the public sector of the economy”. Classification of international standards of public debt into five groups is proposed. The first is the so-called basic functional and organizational principles. The second is “universal” standards, which are the general conceptual and methodological basis for public debt statistics. The third is the standards of public finance statistics. The fourth is the standards related to the assessment of external debt. The fifth is special data dissemination standards. The implementation of international standards of public debt into the system of public finance management of Ukraine requires amendments to the national legislation. For this purpose, a project of the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments and Additions to Part One of Article 2 of the Budget Code of Ukraine (Regarding State Debt)” was developed.
Conclusions. Public finances, including public debt, as an object/objects of management are subject to a clear classification based on the concepts of institutional units and institutional sectors (subsectors) of the national economy used in SNA 2008, ESA 2010, and other international standards. The starting point is the concept of the public sector of the economy, which combines two components - the sector of general government and the sector of public corporations. It is proposed to legislate the definitions of the public sector of the economy and public finance in the Economic Code of Ukraine. The new definition of public debt, which is proposed to be implemented together with related categories under the first part of Article 2 of the Budget Code of Ukraine, is justified.

Keywords:international standards, statistics, public finances, public debt, public finance management system

JEL: H60, H63, H69

Gasanov S. . International standards of public debt statistics and their implementation in the public finance management system of Ukraine / S. . Gasanov // Фінанси України. - 2022. - № 12. - C. 7-21.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 21)

Download

Downloads :103

1. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2010). Budget Code of Ukraine (Act No. 2456-VI, July 7). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17#Text [in Ukrainian].
2. Marchenko, S. (2022). Strategic public finance governance: European integration course, international trends, national peculiarities. Finance of Ukraine, 1, 7–26 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.01.007
3. United Nations, European Commission, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, International Monetary Fund, & World Bank. (2009). System of National Accounts, 2008 (SNA 2008). New York: United Nations. Retrieved from unstats. un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/sna2008.pdf.
4. European Commission, ^& Eurostat. (2013). European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 2010). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5925693/KS-02-13-269- EN.PDF/44cd9d01-bc64-40e5-bd40-d17df0c69334.
5. International Monetary Fund. (2001). Government Finance Statistics Manual. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfs/manual/pdf/all.pdf.
6. International Monetary Fund. (2014). Government finance statistics manual 2014. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/Pubs/FT/GFS/Manual/2014/gfsfinal.pdf.
7. International Monetary Fund. (2011). Public Sector Debt Statistics: Guide for Compilers and Users. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from tffs.org/pdf/method/2013/psds2013.pdf.
8. International Monetary Fund. (2014). External debt statistics: guide for compilers and users/Inter-Agency Task Force on Finance Statistics. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from tffs.org/pdf/edsg/ft2014.pdf.
9. International Monetary Fund. (2009). Balance of payments and international investment position manual (6th Ed.). Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/pdf/bpm6.pdf.
10. Eurostat. (2019). Manual on Government deficit and debt 2019. Implementation of ESA 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/10042108/KS-GQ-19-007-EN-N.pdf/5d6fc8f4-58e3-4354-acd3-a29a66f2e00c.
11. International Monetary Fund. (2013). The special data dissemination standard: guide for subscribers and users. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from dsbb.imf.org/content/pdfs/sddsguide13.pdf.
12. International Monetary Fund. (2013). The Special Data Dissemination Standard Plus: guide for adherents and users. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund, 2013. 22 p. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdds/guide/plus/2013/sddsplus13.pdf.
13. International Monetary Fund. (2016). Monetary and Financial Statistics Manual and Compilation Guide. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. doi.org/10.5089/9781513579191.069
14. Schumpeter, J. A. (1987). History of Economic Analysis. Routledge.
15. Kuznets, S. (1941). Statistics and Economic History. The Journal of Economic History, 1 (1), 26–41. doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700051858
16. Maddison, A. (2007). The World Economy: Vol. 1. A Millennial Perspective. Vol. 2. Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/9789264022621-en
17. Maddison, A. (2007). Contours of the World Economy, 1–2030 AD. Essays in Macro-Economic History. Oxford University Press.
18. Grytsenko, A. A. (2020). The economic and informational imperative of forming a new statistical paradigm. Kyiv: NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
19. Gasanov, S. (2021). Economic transformations and paradigm of statistical science. Finance of Ukraine, 8, 125–128 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.08.125
20. Iefymenko, T. I., Yerokhin, S. A., & Bohdan, T. P. (Eds.). (2014). Debt sustainability of public finances. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=449&num=1 [in Ukrainian]..
21. Gasanov, S. S., Puhachova, M. V., Yashchenko. L. O. et al. (2013). Scientific and methodological principles of statistical analysis of the sustainability of state finances. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=450&num=9 [in Ukrainian].
22. Iefymenko, T. I., & Yermoshenko, M. M. (Eds). (2014). Finance of institutional sectors of the economy of Ukraine. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=449&num=2 [in Ukrainian].
23. Gasanov, S. S. (2012). Structural transformations of the economy and public finances: problems of methodology, theory, and economic policy. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. [in Ukrainian].
24. Iefymenko, T. I., & Bilorus, O. H. (Eds.). (2015). Financial globalization and European integration. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”.Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=448&num=3 [in Ukrainian].
25. Iefymenko, T., Zhuk, V., & Lovinska, L.. (2015). Information in Crisis Management: A Global Aspect of the Standardization of Accounting and Financial Reporting. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=448&num=4 [in Ukrainian].
26. Iefymenko, T. (2016). Fiscal and Monetary Security of National Economy. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=456&num=2 [in Ukrainian].
27. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.). (2016). Actual problems of the development of the state finance management system: European integration context. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”.Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=456&num=1 [in Ukrainian].
28. Sokolovska, A. M. (Ed.). (2017). Tax harmonization in Ukraine under the conditions of implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”.Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=458&num=1 [in Ukrainian].
29. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.). (2017). Public finances of Ukraine: development and change management (problems of economic security). Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=458&num=3 [in Ukrainian].
30. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.). (2018). Current issues of financial management: global trends and national practice. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=1002&num=2 [in Ukrainian].
31. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.). (2019). Management of public finances: fiscal rules, risks, international standards. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getﬁle.php?page_id=1031&num=1 [in Ukrainian].
32. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2013). About the Strategy for the Development of the State Finance Management System (Decree No. 774-r, August 1). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/774-2013-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
33. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2017). On the approval of the Strategy for Reforming the State Finance Management System for 2017–2020 (Decree No. 142-r, February 8). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/142-2017-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
34. Vanoli, A. (2014). National Accounting at the beginning of the 21s’ century: Wherefrom? Whereto? EURONA – Eurostat Review on National Accounts and Macroeconomic Indicators. 1, 9–38. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-statistical-books/-/ks-gp-13-001.
35. Bos, F. (2017). Uses of national accounts from the 17th century till present and three suggestions for the future. EURONA – Eurostat Review on National Accounts and Macroeconomic Indicators, 1, 41–71. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/system/files/euronaissue1-2017-art2.pdf.
36. McCarthy, P. (2018). Integrated frameworks for economic accounting standards. EURONA – Eurostat Review on National Accounts and Macroeconomic Indicators, 2, 7–32. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-statistical-books/-/ks-gp-18-002.
37. Lequiller, F. (2015). Towards convergence between government finance statistics and public sector accounting standards. EURONA – Eurostat Review on National Accounts and Macroeconomic Indicators, 1, 19–48. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-books/-/KS-GP-15-001.
38. Dabbicco, G. (2018). A comparison of debt measures in fiscal statistics and public sector financial statements. Public Money & Management, 38 (7), 511–518. doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1527543
39. Dabbicco, G. (2015). The impact of accrual-based public accounting harmonization on EU macroeconomic surveillance and governments’ policy decision-making. International Journal of Public Administration, 38 (4), 253–267. doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.999581
40. Boisseau-Sierra, M. (2018). Accounting for Public Debt and Deficit. In Farazmand, A. (Ed.). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, pp. 90–98. Cham: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_2294
41. Irwin, T. C. (2015). Defining the government’s debt and deficit. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29 (4), 711–732. doi.org/10.1111/joes.12123
42. Irwin, T. C. (2016). Dispelling fiscal illusions: how much progress have governments made in getting assets and liabilities on balance sheet? Public Money & Management, 36 (3), 219–226. doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1133981
43. Barton, A. (2011). Why Governments should use the Government Finance Statistics Accounting System. Abacus, 47 (4), 411–445. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00347.x
44. Barton, A. (2009). The use and abuse of accounting in the public sector financial management reform program in Australia. Abacus, 45 (2), 221–248. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00283.x
45. Dippelsman, R., Dziobek, C., & Gutierrez Mangas, C. A. (2012). What Lies Beneath: The Statistical Definition of Public Sector Debt. An Overview of the Coverage of Public Sector Debt for 61 Countries. IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/12/09. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3022048
46. De, Vlieger J., & Mügge, D. K. (2018). Fuzzy debt. Why it’s impossible to specify what governments owe. Fickle Formulas Working Paper, 3-2018. Retrieved from www.fickleformulas.org/images/pdf/FFWP%202018- 03%20deVlieger%20M%C3%BCgge%20Fuzzy%20Debt.pdf.