Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 12/2022

№ 12/2022

Fìnansi Ukr. 2022 (12): 56–73
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.12.056

DIGITALIZATION OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE

DMYTRENKO Tetiana 1

1Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2632-2986


Features of the implementation of the European directives regarding the circulation of virtual assets in the national legislation of Ukraine


Introduction. With Ukraine's acquisition of the status of a candidate for membership of the European Union, the legalization of the virtual assets market, taking into account FATF international standards, became a component of the necessary steps for our country's membership in the European community. The consciously chosen direction of future development of our country requires harmonization of legislation and state regulation approaches. Therefore, in order to speed up the pace of legalization of the crypto market, effective interaction of legislators, state and law enforcement agencies, the judicial system and the private sector is required.
Problem Statement. Taking into account the European taxonomy of virtual assets and the legislative basis for the regulation of the virtual assets market, Ukraine has faced several tasks regarding the implementation of the European directives on the markets of financial instruments (MiFID II), on electronic money (EMD) and on crypto assets that do not belong to financial instruments and electronic money under the name Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) and anti-money laundering legislation.
Purpose. To provide justification for the need to implement all directives of the European Union regarding the regulation of the virtual assets market, ensuring compliance with national legislation on combating money laundering (AML/CFT) and improving the effectiveness of the National AML/CFT System
Methods. General scientific and special methods are used: analysis, synthesis, grouping, description, comparison, theoretical generalization and abstract-logical.
Results. Attention was focused on the urgent need for our state to implement European standards in the field of countering the use of proceeds of crime and the financing of terrorism and European Directives on the circulation of virtual assets.
Conclusions. For the restoration and modernization of Ukraine and its integration into the European community, harmonization of not only national and European legislation is necessary, but also modern and effective systems of state regulation and the construction of public-private partnerships. This is especially necessary for legalization and development of the transparent market of virtual assets. New technologies, digitization of state and business activity require effective interaction and joint solutions.

Keywords:virtual assets, service providers related to the turnover of virtual assets, military aggression, evasion of international sanctions, risk-oriented approach, crypto assets, cryptocurrency

JEL: E42


Dmytrenko T. . Features of the implementation of the European directives regarding the circulation of virtual assets in the national legislation of Ukraine / T. Dmytrenko // Фінанси України. - 2022. - № 12. - C. 56-73.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 56 - 73) DownloadDownloads :71
1. FATF. (n. d,), Recommendation 15: New technologies. Retrieved from cfatf-gafic.org/index.php/documents/fatf-40r/381-fatf-recommendation-15-new-technologies.
2. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2018, May 30). Directive (EU) 2018/843 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018L0843.
3. Houben, R., & Snyers, A. (2020, April). Crypto-assets – Key developments, regulatory concerns and responses. Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2020)648779.
4. Brown, C., Dolan, T., & Butler, K. (2019). Crypto-Assets and Initial Coin Offerings. In Madir J. Fintech – Law and Regulation, pp. 74–101. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, doi.org/10.4337/9781788979023.00016
5. Maas, T. (2019). Initial coin offerings: when are tokens securities in the EU and US?. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3337514
6. Vermaak, W. (2022). MiCA: A Guide to the EU’s Proposed Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation. Retrieved from www.sygna.io/blog/what-is-mica-markets-in-crypto-assets-eu-regulation-guide/.
7. Waterfield, S. (2022). MEPs vote against European Bitcoin ban, but the proposals could return. Retrieved from techmonitor.ai/technology/emerging-technology/european-bitcoin-ban-ethereum.
8. Dmytrenko, T., & Lyubich, O. (2020). Implementation of international standards of virtual assets market regulation in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 9, 65–79 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.09.065
9. Yatsyk, T., & Shvets, V. (2020). Cryptoassets as an emerging class of digital assets in the financial accounting. Economic Annals-XXI, 183 (5-6), 106–115. doi.org/10.21003/ea.V183-10
10. Dmytrenko, T., Lyubich, & Parkhomenko, Yu. (2021). Virtual assets market regulation: global and national level of implementation of AML/CFT international standards. Finance of Ukraine, 7, 31–52 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.07.031
11. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2014, May 15). Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (recast). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014L0065.
12. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2009, September 16). Directive 2009/110/EC on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0110.
13. Markets in crypto-assets (MiCA). (2022). Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2022)739221.
14. EBA. (2019, January). Report with advice for the European Commission on crypto-assets. Retrieved from eba.europa.eu/eba-reports-on-crypto-assets.
15. IOSCO. (2019, May). Consultation Report on the Issues, Risks and Regulatory Considerations Relating to Crypto-Asset Trading Platforms. Retrieved from www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD627.pdf.
16. IOSCO. (2020, February). Final Report on the Issues, Risks and Regulatory Considerations Relating to Crypto-Asset Trading Platforms. Retrieved from www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD649.pdf.
17. FSB. (2019, May). Crypto-assets: work underway, regulatory approaches and potential gaps. Retrieved from www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P310519.pdf.
18. G7 working group on stablecoins. (2019, October). Investigating the impact of global stablecoins. Retrieved from www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d187.pdf.
19. ESMA. (2019, January). Advice on Initial Coins Offerings and Crypto-Assets. Retrieved from www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma50-157-1391_crypto_advice.pdf.
20. European Commission. (2019, July). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the assessment of the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting the internal market and relating to cross-border activities (COM(2019) 370 final). Retrieved from op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0b2ecb04-aef4-1e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
21. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Councilon Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0593&from=EN.
22. OECD. (2022). Why Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Matters and the Policy Implications. Retrieved from web-assets.bcg.com/d4/47/64895c544486a7411b06ba4099f2/bcgglobal-wealth-2021-jun-2021.pdf.
23. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2013, August 12). Directive 2013/40/EU on attacks against information systems and replacing Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32013L0040.
24. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2019). On the prevention and countermeasures against the legalization (laundering) of proceeds obtained through crime, the financing of terrorism and the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (Act No. 361-IX, December 6). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/361-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
25. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020). About virtual assets (Draft Law No. 3637, June 11). Retrieved from w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?id=&pf3511=69110 [in Ukrainian].
26. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022). About virtual assets (Act No. 2074-IX, February 17). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2074-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
27. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022). On amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine regarding the taxation of operations with virtual assets (Draft Law No. 7150, March 13). Retrieved from itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/39211 [in Ukrainian].
28. FATF. (2012). International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation the FATF Recommendations (The FATF Recommendations). Retrieved from 000.fatf-gafi .org/topics/fatfrecommendations/documents/fatfrecommendations2012.html.
29. Chainanalysis. (n. d.). 2020-Crypto-Crime-Report. Retrieved from ag-pssg-sharedservices-ex.objectstore.gov.bc.ca/ag-pssg-cc-exh-prod-bkt-ex/257%20%20001%20Appendix%20A%20-%202020-Crypto-Crime-Report%20Chainanalysis.pdf.
30. Crystal Blockchain End of Year Report 2020. (2020). Retrieved from crystalblockchain.com/articles/crystal-blockchain-end-of-year-report-2020.
31. Ciphertrace cryptocurrency intelligence. (2019, November). Cryptocurrency Anti-Money Laundering Report, 2019 Q3. Retrieved from ciphertrace.com/q3-2019-cryptocurrency-anti-money-laundering-report/.
32. Elliptic. (2022). Elliptic Typologies Report Exposes Real Impact of Illicit Behavior in Crypto. Retrieved from www.elliptic.co/blog/elliptic-typologies-report-exposes-real-impact-of-illicit-behavior-in-crypto.
33. Global Ledger Protocol: Digital assets tracking and AML Compliance. (n. d.). Retrieved from glprotocol.com/.
34. AMLBot - AML program to check crypto wallets for illicit funds. (n. d.). Retrieved from amlbot.com/.