№ 3/2023

Fìnansi Ukr. 2023 (3): 88–102https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.03.088

ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING

NASHKERSKA Halyna ¹

¹van Franko National University of Lviv
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-2920

Blockchain technology in accounting: advantages and limitations

Introduction. The application of blockchain technology has a significant potential to increase the efficiency of accounting compared to the traditional system and will ensure the digital transformation of the accounting process.
Problem Statement. The introduction of blockchain technology into the accounting system is at an initial stage and requires significant refinement due to existing limitations.
Purpose. To carry out a comparative analysis of the advantages and limitations of using blockchain technology in accounting in comparison with traditional accounting.
Methods. The main research methods were general and special scientific approaches to theoretical generalization and grouping, systematization, comparative analysis, logical generalization.
Results. Substantiated that the relationship and functionality of the blockchain are perfectly combined with the basic logic of accounting systems. The immutability of the transactions recorded in the blockchain process, the strong ongoing control of the procedures and compliance guaranteed in each phase meet the cardinal principles of accounting summarized in terms of informative data reliability and transparency. Conducted a comparison between pre- and postblockchain accounting characteristics. This established the advantages of blockchaintechnology compared to traditional accounting. The study defines confidentiality issues, scalability and interoperability as important significant constraints for adoption and deployment of blockchain based accounting. Procedural automation of blockchain technology always requires support and monitoring of the correctness of the interpretation of accounting phenomena that require professional judgment. Identified groups of asset transactions that reflect a high probability of outcome uncertainty and measurement uncertainty.
Conclusions. Blockchain integration in accounting at enterprises supports consistent with Ukraine's digital transformation strategy. Accounting from this technology perspective would significantly reduce the amount of time and effort used by accountants for traditional and repetitive daily accounting records and constant control over their reliability. The introduction of blockchain in accounting requires overcoming limitations, the main one is the need to make changes to transactions, which require adjustments due to uncertainty and require accounting judgment.

Keywords:blockchain technology, accounting, blockchain based accounting, accounting professional judgement, uncertainty

JEL: M15, M41, O33

Nashkerska H. . Blockchain technology in accounting: advantages and limitations / H. Nashkerska // Фінанси України. - 2023. - № 3. - C. 88-102.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 88 - 102)

Download

Downloads :111

1. World Economic Forum. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.weforum.org/.
2. Karajovic, M., Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2019). Thinking outside the block: projected phases of blockchain integration in the accounting industry. Australian Accounting Review, 29 (2). 319–330. doi.org/10.1111/auar.12280
3. Maffei, M., Casciello, R., & Meucci, F. (2021). Blockchain technology: uninvestigated issues emerging from an integrated view within accounting and auditing practices. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34 (2), 462–476. doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2020-0264
4. Bellucci, M., Cesa Bianchi, D., & Manetti, G. (2022). Blockchain in accounting practice and research. Systematic literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30 (7), 121–146. doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2021-1477
5. Tiron-Tudor, A., Deliu, D., Farcane, N., & Dontu, A. (2022). Managing change with and through blockchain in accountancy organizations: a systematic literature review. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34 (2), 477–506. doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2020-0302
6. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95 (1), 3–11. Retrieved from hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain.
7. Cai, C. W. (2019). Triple-entry accounting with blockchain: how far have we come? Accounting and Finance, 61 (2). doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12556
8. Rückeshäuser, N. (2017). Do we really want blockchain–based accounting? In Decentralized consensus as enabler of management override of internal controls (13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen), pp. 16–30. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/316240230_Do_We_Really_Want_Blockchain-Based_Accounting_Decentralized_Consensus_as_Enabler_of_Management_Override_of_Internal_Controls.
9. Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31 (3), 5–21. doi.org/10.2308/isys-51804
10. Fuller, S. H., & Markelevich, A. (2019). Should accountants care about blockchain? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 31 (2), 34–46. doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22424
11. Yaroshchuk, I., & Belova, I. (2020). Blockchane technology in accounting and audit. The Institute of Accounting, Control and Analysis in the Globalization Circumstances, 3-4, 28–44 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.35774/ibo2020.03.028
12. Matskiv, H., Smirnova, I., Malikova, A., Puhachenko, O., & Dubinina, M. (2023). The application of blockchain technology in accounting and auditing: experience of Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1 (48), 180–192. doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3955
13. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. Massachusetts: O’Reilly Media, Inc. Retrieved from www.amazon.com/Blockchain-Blueprint-Economy-Melanie-Swan/dp/1491920491.
14. Coleman, L. (2016, December 1). How PwC’s Vulcan Blockchain Seeks to Bring Banks into the New Digital Era. CCN. Retrieved from www.nasdaq.com/articles/pwc-launches-vulcan-compliance-oriented-blockchain-banks-and-governments-2016-11-17.
15. NASDAQ. (2016, November 17). KPMG and Microsoft announce new “blockchain nodes”. Retrieved from www.ccn.com/pwcs-vulcan-blockchain-seeks-bring-banks-new-digital-era/.
16. O’Leary, D. E. (2017). Configuring blockchain architectures for transaction information in blockchain consortiums: The case of accounting and supply chain systems. Intelligent Systems in Accounting. Finance and Management, 24 (4), 138–147. doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1417
17. Kokina, J., Mancha, R., & Pachamanova, D. (2017). Blockchain: Emergent industry adoption and implications for accounting. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14 (2), 91–100. doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51911
18. Nashkerska, H. (2022). Accounting for uncertainty assets. Scientific Bulletin of the Odessa National Economic University, 9-10, 43–49 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.32680/2409-9260-2022-9-10-298-299-43-49
19. CPA, & AICPA. (2017). Blockchain technology and its potential impact on the audit and assurance profession. Retrieved from www.cpacanada.ca/en/business-and-accounting-resources/auditand-assurance/canadian-auditing-standards-cas/publications/impact-of-blockchain-on-aud.
20. Atanasovski,. A., Trpeska, M., & Lazarevska, Z. B. (2020). The Block Chain Technology and Its Limitations for True Disruptiveness of Accounting and Assurance. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, XV, 4 (70), 738–748. Retrieved from cesmaa.org/Docs/Winter/JAES%20VolumeXV%20Issue4(70)Winter2020_3.pdf.
21. Finyear. (n. d.). Rubix: the blockchain by Deloitte. Retrieved from www.finyear.com/Finyear--Rubix-the-blockchain-by-Deloitte_a33703.html.
22. Wang, Y., & Kogan, A. (2018). Designing confidentiality-preserving blockchain-based transaction processing systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 30, 1–18. doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2018.06.001
23. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2019, June 20). Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 on market surveillance and compliance of products and amending Directive 2004/42/EC and Regulations (EC) No 765/2008 and (EU) No 305/2011. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32019R1020/.
24. IASB. (2010, September 1). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_009 [in Ukrainian].
25. Siew, E. G., Rosli, K., & Yeow, P. H. (2019). Organisational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36, 1–19. doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100445