№ 6/2023

Fìnansi Ukr. 2023 (6): 96–111https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.06.096

TAX POLICY

SOKOLOVSKA Alla ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-8215

Consolidation of the unified social contribution and personal income tax in the context of Ukraine’s European integration aspirations

. Introduction. The high tax burden on labor is a problem not only for Ukraine, but also for many European countries, negatively affecting the labor market, in particular, it is considered one of the reasons for relatively high unemployment and informal employment. In Ukraine, it is proposed to solve this problem by consolidation the unified social contribution(hereinafter-USC) and personal income tax( hereinafter-PIT)(in fact, by abolishing the unified social contribution).
Problem Statement. Despite the fact that the implementation of this proposal is associated with serious fiscal and social risks, it has not been the subject of scientific debate, although it was first published in Ukrainian periodicals in 2018-2020.
Purpose. To assess the abolition of the unified social contribution in the context of compliance of such a transformation with European guarantees of adequate social protection and the European social model in general.
Methods. The methods used are comparative and statistical analysis, abstract logic, analogies and theoretical generalization.
Results. It has been established that, unlike the proposal to consolidate USC and PIT in Ukraine, the implementation of which will lead to a decrease in the living standards of people who have already retired and will receive a minimum income from the state budget, which will be able to protect them only from absolute poverty, and reliance on future pensioners-participants of private pension funds of all risks related to their provision after termination of employment, principle 15 of the European Pillar of Social Rights emphasizes the right of older persons to adequate pensions and a dignified old age. The importance of achieving this goal is evidenced by the fact that every three years, the European Commission publishes a report that reviews the current and future adequacy of old-age incomes in EU member states in three dimensions – poverty prevention, ability to replace income received before retirement and retirement duration – and analyzes key reforms aimed at ensuring the financial sustainability of pension systems. Such reforms are carried out in two main areas: revision of social contribution rates and expansion of financing from general government revenues, in particular, property, consumption, and environmental taxes.
Conclusions. It has been found out that the abolition of USC as a stable source of financing the social insurance system in Ukraine will result in either its erosion or complete dismantling of the welfare state. This may complicate our movement towards the EU due to the inconsistency of Ukrainian approaches to solving social problems with European ones.

Keywords:labor tax burden, unified social contribution, tax reform, sources of social insurance financing, European guarantees of social protection

JEL: E62, F15, H24, I39, J26

Sokolovska A. . Consolidation of the unified social contribution and personal income tax in the context of Ukraine’s European integration aspirations / A. . Sokolovska // Фінанси України. - 2023. - № 6. - C. 96-111.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 96 - 111)

Download

Downloads :32

1. Goudswaard, K., & Caminada, K. (2015). Social security contributions: Economic and public finance considerations. International Social Security Review, 68 (4), 25–45. doi.org/10.1111/issr.12086
2. Iefymenko, T. I., Sokolovska, A. M., & Rainova, L. B. (2021). Reforms of Social Security Contributions in Selected EU Member States and Ukraine: Peculiarities of Implementation and Consequences. Science and Innovation, 17 (6), 24–40. doi.org/10.15407/scine17.06.024
3. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022). On amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and other legislative acts on reducing the burden on the wage fund (Explanatory note to the Draft Law of Ukraine No. 6548, January 1). Retrieved from w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=73637.
4. Dubrovskyi, V. (2018, November 9). Solidarity pension system: a century-long crime. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Retrieved from dt.ua/social_secutity/solidarna-pensiyna-sistema-zlochin-trivalistyu-v-stolittya-293624_.html [in Ukrainian].
5. Shemiatkin, O. (2019, March 1). Reducing the burden on the wage fund and pension reform - where to start? Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Retrieved from kmp.ua/uk/analytics/press/decreasing-the-burden-on-the-labor-compensation-fund-and-the-pension-reform-where-to-start/ [in Ukrainian].
6. Accountant 911. (2020, January 11). Single Social Contribution, the Personal Income Tax and the military tax must be combined - Hetmantsev. Retrieved from buhgalter911.com/uk/news/news-1047545.html [in Ukrainian].
7. Press service of the Apparatus of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2023, January 17). The anti-corruption tax reform will bring the state's tax system in line with economic challenges. Retrieved from www.rada.gov.ua/news/news_kom/232239.html [in Ukrainian].
8. Rajevska, O. (2021). Chapter 11: Pension systems as risk management: a case of the Baltic states. In Aidukaite, J., Hort, S. E. O., & Kuhnle, S. (Eds.). Challenges to the Welfare State. doi.org/10.4337/9781839106118.00019
9. Orszag, P. R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). Rethinking Pension Reform: Ten Myths About Social Security Systems. In World Bank Conference, “New Ideas About Old Age Security” (September 14-15, 1999). Retrieved from www8.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/sites/jstiglitz/files/2001_Rethinking_Pension_Reform_Ten_Myths.pdf.
10. Gylys, P. (2004). Reforms of Pension System in Lithuania. Ekonomika, 66, 7–18. doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2004.17350
11. European Commission. (2021). 2021 pension adequacy report – Current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU, vol. 1. Retrieved from data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/013455.
12. European Commission. (2015). The 2015 Pension Adequacy Report: current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU, vol. I. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=14529&langId=en.
13. KPMG. (n. d.). Highest employer social security rates. Retrieved from kpmg.com/sg/en/home/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/tax-rates-online/social-security-employer-tax-rates-table.html.
14. Trading economics. (n. d.). Social Security Rate for Companies. Retrieved from tradingeconomics.com/country-list/social-security-rate-for-companies.
15. Anciūtė, A., Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, V., Maftei, A., & Varga, J. (2020). Labour Tax and Child Benefits Reform in Lithuania: For Better or Worse? European Economy Economic Briefs, 059. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/eb059_en.pdf.
16. Saez, E., Schoefer, B., & Seim, D. (2017, November 22). The effects of employer payroll tax cuts on employment, business activity and wages. Retrieved from voxeu.org/article/effects-employer-payroll-tax-cuts.
17. Melguizo, Á., & González-Páramo, J. M. (2013). Who bears labour taxes and social contributions? A meta-analysis approach. SERIEs, 4 (3), 247–271. doi.org/10.1007/s13209-012-0091-x
18. Consolidated version of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. (2012). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN.
19. European Parliament, European Council, & European Commission. (2017, November 16). European Pillar of Social Rights. Retrieved from commission.europa.eu/publications/european-pillar-social-rights-booklet_en.
20. European Commission. (n. d.). The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan. Retrieved from commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/economy-works-people/jobs-growth-and-investment/european-pillar-social-rights/european-pillar-social-rights-action-plan_en.
21. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2000). Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Crisis of the Welfare State. Harvard Law Review, 113 (7), 1573–1676. doi.org/10.2307/1342445
22. Wagner, N. (2011). Financing social security in the EU: Business as usual? International Labour Review, 151 (4). doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2012.00152.x
23. OECD. (2018, July). Tax policies for inclusive growth in a changing world (OECD report to G-20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/g20/Tax-policies-for-inclusive-growth-in-a-changing-world-OECD.pdf
24. IFO Institute for Economic Research. (2008). Bismarck versus Beveridge: a Comparison of Social Insurance Systems in Europe. CESifo DICE Report, 6 (4), 69–71. Retrieved from www.ifo.de/DocDL/CESifoDICEreport408.pdf.
25. Eurostat. (n. d.). Social protection receipts by type. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/estat-navtree-portlet-prod/BulkDownloadListing?file=data/spr_rec_sumt.tsv.gz.
26. International Monetary Fund. (2019, November 25). Ukraine. Distributed Profit Tax; Voluntary Disclosure of Assets; and BEPS Implementation (Technical Assistance Report), pp. 9–18. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2019/11/22/Ukraine-Technical-Assistance-Report-Distributed-Profit-Tax-Voluntary-Disclosure-of-Assets-48834?cid=em-COM-123-39784.
27. Haidutskyi, A. (2022, October 31). Where to get money for the economy of Ukraine. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. 2022. Retrieved from zn.ua/ukr/macrolevel/mihranti-ta-diaspora-kljuchovi-investori-ukrajini-tak-rozshirte-jikhni-mozhlivosti.html.
28. Stiglitz, J. E. (2005). More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Toward the Post-Washington Consensus. In Studies in Development Economics and Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi.org/10.1057/9780230501850_2