№ 5/2023

Fìnansi Ukr. 2023 (5): 7–29https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.05.007

PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT

BOHDAN Tetiana ¹, BOHDAN Ivan ²

¹NGO “Growford Institute”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-5336
²National Bank of Ukraine
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-0198

Budget deficits and public debt of Ukraine under the shocks of pandemic and military aggression

Introduction. The extraordinary conditions for the government’s functioning during the pandemic and warfare provoked a strong respose of the state institutions, as a result of which the size of budget deficit in Ukraine over 2022-2023 exceeded a lot the historical values and averages for the different country groups as most indicators of the debt burden worsened, generating the danger of debt unsustainability.
Problem Statement. Identification of the nature of Ukraine’s fiscal policy through the lens of past and contemporary global phenomenon, identification of macro-financial factors impacting he state of debt sustainability under the extreme conditions, analysis of debt burden indicators and fiscal risks in order to outline the ways of solving the fiscal and debt problems in Ukraine.
Purpose. To reveal the global patterns and national features of the expansive fiscal policy conduct and public debt accumulation in emergency conditions which are connected with the pandemic and military actions , to investigate the factors of Ukrainian government’s solvency deterioration and to assess the relevant risks, as well as to define the tools of public debt management in the medium run.
Methods. General scientific and special methods are applied: analysis and synthesis, description and comparison, historical method, method of theoretical generalization and abstract-logical method.
Results. It has been found that the impact of operations of the general government on aggregate demand in Ukraine was positive in 2020, 2021 and 2022, and this situation was in sharp contrast to the period of 2015-2019, when fiscal policy produced restrictive effects. Fiscal policy in Ukraine was of pro-cyclical nature in 2014-2018 and turned to countercyclical stance only in 2020 with sustaining this course until 2023. It has been proven that in Ukraine the debt sustainability criteria are violated across major part of debt burden indicators , that signal the high solvency risks and liquidity risks for general government; moreover, relative to 2019, the dynamics of most indicators in 2020 and 2022-2023 were unfavorable. Computations conducted indicate that refinancing risks, foreign exchange and interest rate risks inherent to the structure of public debt have increased significantly with the start of hostilities in Ukraine.
Conclusions. In the post-war period, contraction of budget deficit and well-balanced restructuring of the external public debt should become the main levers for debt reduction. Effective management of public debt with consideration of existing risks are important for securing macro-financial stability and active government’s involvement in the post-war reconstruction of the country.

Keywords:fiscal policy, deficit, public debt, pandemic, martial law, debt sustainability, loan guarantees

JEL: H12, H62, H63

BOHDAN T. . Budget deficits and public debt of Ukraine under the shocks of pandemic and military aggression / T. . BOHDAN, I. . BOHDAN // Фінанси України. - 2023. - № 5. - C. 7-29.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 29)

Download

Downloads :97

1. Bilorus, O. H., & Iefymenko, T. I. (Eds.). (2015). Financial globalization and European integration. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
2. Iefymenko, T. I., Yerokhin, S. A., & Bohdan, T. P. (Eds.). (2015). Debt sustainability of public finances. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
3. Gasanov, S. S., Puhachjva, M. V., Yashchenko, L. O. et al. (2013). Scientific and methodological principles of statistical analysis of the sustainability of state finances. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
4. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.). (2018). Actual problems of financial management: global trends and national practice. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
5. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.). (2019). Management of public finances: fiscal rules, risks, international standards. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
6. Bohdan, T. (2019). Global debt as indicator of world economic problems and challenges for financial policy of Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 9, 43–63 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.09.043
7. Gasanov, S., Kudrjashov, V., & Balakin, R. (2019). Supranational fiscal rules and coordination of budgetary policy in the European Union. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 37–55 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.03.037
8. Gasanov, S. (2018). Fiscal rules and fiscal responsibility: economic security context. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 7–23 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.03.007
9. Gasanov, S. (2022). International standards of public debt statistics and their implementation in the public finance management system of Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 12, 7–21 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2022.12.007
10. Gasanov, S. (2023). International standards of public debt statistics and their implementation in the public finance management system of Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 1, 26–47 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.01.026
11. Eichengreen, B., El-Ganainy, A., Esteves, R., & Mitchener, K. J. (2021). In Defense of Public Debt. Oxford University Press. doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197577899.001.0001
12. Buti, M., & Franko, D. (2005). Fiscal Policy in Economic and Monetary Union: Theory, Evidence, and Institutions. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi.org/10.4337/9781845426712
13. Leeper, E. M. (2009). Anchoring Fiscal Expectations. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, 72 (3), 17–42. doi.org/10.3386/w15269
14. Schaechter, A., Kinda, T., Budina, N., & Weber, A. (2012). Fiscal Rules in Response to the Crisis — Toward the “Next-Generation” Rules. A New Dataset. International Monetary Fund. Ddoi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2169733
15. Kopits, G. (2011). Independent Fiscal Institutions: Developing Good Practices. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 11 (3), 1–18. doi.org/10.1787/budget-11-5kg3pdgcpn42
16. Cangiano, M., Curristine, T., & Lazare, M. (2013). Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
17. Zouhar, J., Jellema, A., Lustig, N., & Trabelsi, M. (2021). Public Expenditure and Inclusive Growth. A Survey. IMF Working Paper, 2021/083. Retrieved from www. imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/03/19/Public-Expenditure-and-Inclusive-Growth-ASurvey-50190.
18. International Monetary Fund. (2021, April). A Fair Shot. Fiscal Monitor. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2021/03/29/fiscal-monitor-april-2021#Full%20Report.
19. International Monetary Fund. (2021, October). Strengthening the Credibility of Public Finances. Fiscal Monitor. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2021/10/13/fiscal-monitor-october-2021.
20. International Monetary Fund. (n. d.). Policy Tracker. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19#U.
21. Velasco, A. (2020, August 25). Are We All Keynesian Again? Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
22. International Monetary Fund. (2023, April). On the Path to Policy Normalization. Fiscal Monitor. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2023/04/03/fiscal-monitor-april-2023.
23. International Monetary Fund. (2022, April). Fiscal Policy from Pandemic to War. Fiscal Monitor. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2022/04/12/fiscal-monitor-april-2022.
24. International Monetary Fund. (2023, April). A Rocky Recovery. World Economic Outlook. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2023/04/11/world-economic-outlook-april-2023.
25. Open Budget. (n. d.). Retrieved from openbudget.gov.ua/national-budget/expenses?class=functional&view=table.
26. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023). State and state-guaranteed debt of Ukraine as of May 31, 2023. Retrieved from mof.gov.ua/uk/derzhavnij-borg-ta-garantovanij-derzhavju-borg [in Ukrainian].
27. Bogdan, T., & Jovanovic, B. (2023). Public Expenditure and Tax Policy for the Post-War Reconstruction of Ukraine. Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. Policy Notes and Reports, 69. Retrieved from wiiw.ac.at/public-expenditure-and-tax-policy-for-the-post-war-reconstruction-of-ukraine-p-6573.html.
28. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023). Funding of the state budget of Ukraine since the beginning of the full-scale war. Retrieved from mof.gov.ua/uk/news/ukraines_state_budget_financing_since_the_beginning_of_the_full-scale_war-3435 [in Ukrainian].
29. International Monetary Fund. (2013). Staff Guidance Note for Public Debt Sustainability Analysis in Market-Access Countries. doi.org/10.5089/9781498341844.007
30. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023). Information on the provided state guarantees. Retrieved from mof.gov.ua/uk/reestr-derzhavnih-garantij [in Ukrainian].
31. Brixi, H., & Schick, A. (2002). Government at Risk: Contingent Liabilities and Fiscal Risk. New York: Oxford University Press. doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-4835-2
32. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023). Memorandum on Economic and Financial Policy (March 24, 2023). Retrieved from mof.gov.ua/uk/memorandum_of_economic__financial_policies-677 [in Ukrainian].