№ 8/2023

Fìnansi Ukr. 2023 (8): 113–128https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.08.113

SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSIONS

ZHYBER Tetiana ¹, TYMCHENKO Olena ²

¹Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-023X
²SHEE “Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-1261

Conceptualization of budgeting in the paradigm of institutionalism

Introduction. The development of a theoretical and methodological concept of budgeting in public finance is necessary and important for Ukraine, which does not have its own long tradition of the budgeting technologies developing on the democratic principles. Considering the fact that budgeting takes place in an institutional environment, it is reasonable to substantiate the conceptual foundations of budgeting in the paradigm of institutionalism.
Problem Statement. A systematized presentation of the conceptual foundations of budgeting as a macro-level financial and management technology with the specification of elements, conditions and principles remains an unresolved task.
The purpose of the article is to substantiate the conceptual foundations of modern budgeting as a financial and management technology aimed at ensuring public welfare, to identify the components of budgeting, to expand and deepen their characteristics compared to the previous developments, to substantiate the principles of budgeting.
Methods. The authors base their research on the methodology of institutionalism. They use evolutionistic approach to argue for the institutional nature of budgeting; systemic approach and theoretical generalizations - for conceptualizing budgeting; graphic interpretation - for a visualization of the components of budgeting as a financial and management technology.
Results. The authors reveal the evolutionary changes in the development of budgeting technologies, give the definition of budgeting in public finance, identify the elements of budgeting, determine the sequence of budgeting stages as a process aimed at ensuring sustainable development and growth of the welfare of society, and substantiate the principles of budgeting.
Conclusions. Budgeting in public finance is a management technology, the content of which is revealed in two aspects: 1) as a set of techniques, tools and methods; 2) as a process consisting of successive stages: from setting the goals and tasks of socio-economic development to evaluating effectiveness and efficiency. With the evolution of the state, approaches changed and different budgeting technologies were formed. The main task of financial and management engineering is the correct choice and combination of various budgeting technologies or their components to achieve the desirable result.

Keywords:budgeting of public financial resources, performance management, financial and managerial engineering, principles of budgeting, budgets, institutionalism

JEL: Н61, M10

Zhyber T. . Conceptualization of budgeting in the paradigm of institutionalism / T. Zhyber, O. . TYMCHENKO // Фінанси України. - 2023. - № 8. - C. 113-128.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 113 - 128)

Download

Downloads :61

1. Fedosov, V. M. (Ed.). (2002). Financial restructuring in Ukraine: Problems and directions. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
2. Oparin, V. M. (2002). Finance (General theory). Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
3. Kondratiuk, S. (2015). The genesis of the budget in the Great Britain in the context of constitutional history and parliamentarism. Finance of Ukraine, 8, 114–127. Retrieved from finukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&aid=4236 [in Ukrainian].
4. Chugunov, I. (2004). Becoming of budgetary system and the mechanism of budgetary regulation in Ukraine. Scientific Papers NaUKMA. Economics, 30, 12–17. Retrieved from ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/items/e6dcbc81-5249-4951-9338-8afd55181d2c [in Ukrainian].
5. Yuriy, S. I., & Beskyd Y. M. (2000). Budget system of Ukraine. Kyiv: NIOS [in Ukrainian].
6. Fedosov, V. M., & Yuriy, S. S. (Eds.). Budget system. Kyiv: TSUL: Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].
7. Andrushchenko, V. L., & Tuchak, T. V. (2013). Moral-ethical imperatives of taxes and taxation (Western tradition). Kyiv: Alerta [in Ukrainian].
8. Fedosov, V. (Ed.). (2004). Budget management. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
9. Chugunov, V. (2022). Budget policy of economic growth. Agrosvit, 1, 88–94 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2022.1.88
10. Grytsenko, A. A. (Ed.). (2015). Institutional transformations of the socio-economic system of Ukraine. Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
11. Sidenko, V. R. (2017). Institutional transformation of the financial-economic system of Ukraine in the conditions of globalization. Kyiv: KNTEU [in Ukrainian].
12. Chugunov, I. (2008). Institutional architecture of the budgetary system. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 3–10 [in Ukrainian].
13. Makogon, V. D. (2012). Budget Architectonics as Tools on Socio-economic Development of Society. The Problems of Economy, 4, 73–77. Retrieved from www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2012-4_0-pages-73_77.pdf [in Ukrainian].
14. Seliverstova, L. (2018). Budget architecture as an instrument for the development of the financial system of Ukraine. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, 10, 5–8. Retrieved from www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=6085&i=0 [in Ukrainian].
15. Yukhymenko, Ya. (2018). Institutional modernization of architectonics of the national budget. RFI Scientific Papers, 1, 19–32. Retrieved from npndfi.org.ua/?page_id=723&aid=912 [in Ukrainian].
16. Savchuk, N. V. (2013 Institutional concepts of budgetary system reform. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 31, 154–165 [in Ukrainian].
17. Lobodina, Z. (2018). Architectonics of budget mechanism of socio-economic development of the state. World of Finance, 1 (54), 45–57 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.35774/sf2018.01.045
18. Liutyi, I., & Bilyavska, O. (2021). Peculiarities of budgeting in a classical university as a condition of financial autonomy. Herald of Economics, 2, 39–53 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2021.02.039
19. Lyutiy, I., Petlenko, Y., & Drozd, N. (2022). The importance of openness and transparency in the budget process in the defense and security sector of Ukraine. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 6 (47), 99–110 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.47.2022.3900
20. Zhyber, T. V., & Solopenko, T. V. (2020). Essential legal aspects of determining components of the budget program efficiency indicator on the example of financing the secondary level of medical care. Economic Herald. Series: Finance, Accounting, Taxation, 5, 88–97 [in Ukrainian].
21. Sorokin, P. A. (1961). Variations on the Spencerian theme of militant and industrial types of society. Social Science, XXXVI, 91–99.
22. Ansell, C. K. (2001). Political legitimacy. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 6, 8704–8706. doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01167-0
23. Greenwood, R., & Lawrence, T. B. (2005). The iron cage in the information age: The legacy and relevance of Max Weber for organization studies. Editorial. Organization Studies, 26 (4), 493–499. doi.org/10.1177/0170840605051465
24. Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (2004). Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Opposing Views of the State. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House [in Ukrainian].
25. Chugunov, I., & Makogon, V. D. (2016). Budget policy under economic transformation. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4 (2), 66–69 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-15
26. Minouche, Sh. (2021). What we owe each other: A New Social Contract for a Better Society. Princeton University Press.
27. Paz-Fuchs, A. (2011). The social contract revisited: The modern welfare state. Overview and critical report. University of Oxford, 2011.
28. Hodgson, G. (1988). Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press: Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi.org/10.9783/9781512816952
29. Myrdal, G. (1978). Institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 12 (4), 771–783. doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503577
30. Pylypenko, H. M. (2020). Institutional changes of the economy in the context of evolution of D. North’s views. Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of Technology, 3, 9–17 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/71.009
31. Furubotn, E. G., & Richte, R. (2010). Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. University of Michigan Press.
32. György, A. (2012). Public sector’s principal-agent theory in a global world. Politeja-Pismo Wydziału Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 20-3, 101–107.
33. Williamson, C. R. (2009). Informal institutions rule: institutional arrangements and economic performance. Public Choice, 139 (3), 371–387. doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9399-x
34. Schick, A. (1986). Macro-budgetary adaptations to fiscal stress in industrialized democracies. Public Administration Review, 46 (2), 124–134. doi.org/10.2307/976164
35. Schick, A. (1988). Micro-budgetary adaptations to fiscal stress in industrialized democracies. Public Administration Review, 48 (1), 523–533. doi.org/10.2307/975515
36. Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic association, 8 (4), 677–716. doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00537.x
37. Paientko, T. V. (2015). Institutional Asymmetries in Budget Expenditures and Prospects of their Overcoming in Ukraine. The Problems of Economy, 4, 144–149 [in Russian].
38. Tymchenko, O. M. (2011). Institutional theory as the basis for understanding tax debt. Vcheni zapysky KNEU, 13, 72–78 [in Ukrainian].
39. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
40. Khadzhyradieva, S., Hrechko, T., & Smalskys, V. (2019). Institutionalisation of behavioural insights in public policy. Public Policy and Administration, 18 (3), 95–113. doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.18.3.24726
41. Horton, M., & El-Ganainy, A. (2012). Fiscal policy: taking and giving away. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/36-fiscal-policy.htm.
42. Savchuk, N. (2018). Criteria for optimizing the structure of budget expenditures in Ukraine. Journal of International Finance and Economics, 18 (1), 13–26. doi.org/10.18374/JIFE-18-1.2
43. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (n. d.). Budget policy. Retrieved from mof.gov.ua/uk/budget-policy [in Ukrainian].