№ 9/2023

Fìnansi Ukr. 2023 (9): 7–23https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.09.007

PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT

BOHDAN Tetiana ¹, BOHDAN Ivan ²

¹NGO “Growford Institute”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-5336
²National Bank of Ukraine
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-0198

Explicit contingent liabilities of the Ukraine’s Government during the war and pandemic and management of their risks

Introduction. The extraordinary conditions of public finances functioning raise the problems of the riskiness of government contingent liabilities and management of their volumes. Ukraine has not created so far a comprehensive system for monitoring fiscal risks and contingent liabilities, assessing their value, disclosing information, and holistic system for managing such liabilities.
Problem Statement. The establishment of organizational and methodological pillars for analysis, evaluation, control and compilation of relevant reports on fiscal risks and contingent liabilities, are of great importance for making balanced decisions in the field of public finances.
Purpose is to identify key trends and reveal the features of the formation of explicit contingent liabilities of the government in Ukraine during the war and pandemic, and to develop proposals for the creation of a comprehensive system of reporting on contingent liabilities and managing their risks, which will ensure the support of Ukraine’s fiscal sustainability and the adoption of reasonable management decisions.
Methods. General scientific and special methods are applied: analysis and synthesis, description and comparison, historical method, method of theoretical generalization and abstract-logical method.
Results. The authors find a significant increase in state-guaranteed debt during the pandemic and a drop in its nominal value during the 2022-2023 war that are attributed to the credit market crunch in Ukraine and to the complexity of administrative procedures for obtaining guarantees during martial law. They suggest that government support of certain large state-owned enterprises and small business entities caused problems related to the poor control over expediency of spending budgetary funds and to weak perception of the fiscal risks imputed by government loan guarantees. The IMF’s and the EU’s standards for reporting on fiscal risks and contingent liabilities are summarized, and methodical approaches to assessing the fiscal impact of explicit contingent liabilities are outlined.
Conclusions. Risks of contingent liabilities will be mitigated by limiting their volume and assessing fiscal impact, confining the scope of state guarantees provision to the self-sustaining projects, partially shifting the costs of guarantees to private entities (partial guaranties), and reasonable planning of expenditures related to contingent liabilities. In addition, the most complete and correct presentation of information about existing fiscal risks will enhance the degree of policy decisions’ reasoning in the course of fiscal policy implementation.

Keywords:contingent liabilities, war, pandemic, fiscal risks, loan guarantees, transparency, reporting

JEL: H12, H56, H81

BOHDAN T. . Explicit contingent liabilities of the Ukraine’s Government during the war and pandemic and management of their risks / T. . BOHDAN, I. . BOHDAN // Фінанси України. - 2023. - № 9. - C. 7-23.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 23)

Download

Downloads :92

1. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023, June 19). Letter of Intent and Memorandum on Economic and Financial Policy. Retrieved from mof.gov.ua/uk/memorandum_of_economic__financial_policies-677 [in Ukrainian].
2. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2021). Strategy for reforming the state finance management system for 2022–2025 (Decree No. 1805-r, December 29). Retrieved from ukurier.gov.ua/uk/articles/pro-shvalennya-strategiyi-reformuvannya-sistemi-up [in Ukrainian].
3. Danylenko, A. I. (Ed.). (2011). State policy of stabilizing the finances of enterprises, pp. 44–45. Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
4. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.). (2019). Management of public finances: fiscal rules, risks, international standards. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=1031&num=1 [in Ukrainian].
5. State guarantees to enterprises: trends, practice and potential risks for public finances. (2014). Iefymenko, T. I., Yerokhin, S. A., & Bohdan, T. P. (Eds.). Debt sustainability of public finances, pp. 257–271. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=449&num=1 [in Ukrainian].
6. Lunina, I. O. (Ed.). (2014). Development of public finances of Ukraine in conditions of globalization. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/Mon_Lunina2014_Web.pdf [in Ukrainian].
7. Cebotari, A., Davis, J., Lusinyan, L., Mati, A., Mauro, P., Petrie, M., & Velloso, R. (2008). Fiscal Risks: Sources, Disclosure, and Management. International Monetary Fund. doi.org/10.5089/9781498334525.007
8. Cangino, M., Curristine, T., & Lazare, M. (Eds.). (2013). Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture. International Monetary Fund. doi.org/10.5089/9781475531091.071
9. Brixi, H., & Mody, A. (2000). Priorities for the Management of Contingent Liabilities. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/250188483_PRIORITIES_FOR_THE_MANAGEMENT_OF_CONTINGENT_ LIABILITIES.
10. Polackova, H. (1998). Government Contingent Liabilities: A Hidden Risk to Fiscal Stability. The World Bank. doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1989
11. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023). State and state-guaranteed debt of Ukraine as of 07/31/2023. Retrieved from mof.gov.ua/uk/derzhavnij-borg-ta-garantovanij-derzhavju-borg [in Ukrainian].
12. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2023). Information on fiscal risks and their impact on the indicators of the state budget in 2024 (accompanying materials to the draft budget for 2024). Retrieved from itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/42796 [in Ukrainian].
13. Brixi, H., & Schick, A. (2002). Government at Risk: Contingent Liabilities and Fiscal Risk. New York: Oxford University Press. doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-4835-2
14. Cebotari, A (2008). Contingent Liabilities: Issues and Practice. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 2008/245. doi.org/10.5089/9781451871036.001
15. International Monetary Fund. (2012). Fiscal Transparency, Accountability, and Risk. doi.org/10.5089/9781498340076.007
16. OECD. (2015). Recommendation of the Council on Budgetary Governance. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/Recommendation-of-the-Council-on-Budgetary-Governance.pdf.
17. International Monetary Fund. (2019). The Fiscal Transparency Code. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/Code2019.pdf.
18. EU Council. (2011, November 8). Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv: OJ.L_.2011.306.01.0041.01.ENG.
19. Budina, N., & Petrie, M. (2013). Managing and Controlling Fiscal Risks. In Cangino, M., Curristine, T., & Lazare, M. (Eds.). (2013). Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781475531091/ch005.xml.
20. International Monetary Fund. (2016). Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks: Best Practices. doi.org/10.5089/9781498345668.007
21. International Monetary Fund. (2005). Government Guarantees and Fiscal Risk. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/040105c.pdf.