№ 5/2020

Fìnansi Ukr. 2020 (5): 63–83https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.05.063

PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT

BALAKIN Robert ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-6635

Institutional provisions for the foundation and implementation of the EU fiscal rules in the process of public finance management

Institutional support for the application of fiscal rules is becoming increasingly important at the supranational and national levels of government in the European Union. The recently enhanced EU fiscal governance framework (through the so-called “six pack” and “two pack” legislative documents on requirements for national budgetary frameworks) broadened the role and formalised the tasks of national fiscal rules in an attempt to foster budgetary discipline and to increase national ownership of EU fiscal rules. This paper examines which economic, institutional and political characteristics of countries affect the likelihood that a numerical fiscal rule will be adopted as part of a current ?scal strategy to limit the level of public deficit and public debt. Countries eager to join the EU showed their commitment to Maastricht targets by incorporating fiscal rules into national laws. The EU member states facing financial difficulties after 2009 sovereign debt crisis were coerced into adopting more stringent fiscal rules to obtain financial support from the EU. Entering into force on January 1, 2013, the “fiscal compact” coerces all 25 ratifying countries to adopt national fiscal rules into national constitution or law within a year. At the fundamental work of IMF experts in 2013, the application of such rules was called one of the important innovations in the field of public financial management. The “new generation” fiscal rules are complicated as they combine the goals of sustainability and flexibility, thus creating new challenges for implementing and monitoring compliance. The number of fiscal rules with political status (coalition agreement, political agreement or political commitment) has decreased, while those with legal status increased. Fiscal rules do matter in government strategy when implementing fiscal reform and that fiscal rules behave similarly to other fiscal reforms. This paper examines which economic, institutional and political characteristics of countries affect the likelihood that a numeral rule will be adopted as part of a ?scal strategy to limit the level of public debt. The article reveals the essential characteristics of inter-institutional cooperation in the process of formation, application and monitoring of the implementation of fiscal rules in the EU. The formation, development and reform of key EU institutions involved in the development and implementation of fiscal rules are analyzed. The principles of medium-term budget planning are studied. The mechanisms of implementation of ways to overcome macroeconomic imbalances are considered. The potential of using the gained experience of the EU member states is determined.

Keywords:public finance, fiscal rules, budget legislation, European semester, EU institutions, medium-term budgetary frameworks

JEL: H61, H87

BALAKIN R. . Institutional provisions for the foundation and implementation of the EU fiscal rules in the process of public finance management / R. . BALAKIN // Фінанси України. - 2020. - № 5. - C. 63-83.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 63 - 83)

Download

Downloads :142

1. North, D. (2000). Institutions, institutional changes and the functioning of the economy. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
2. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.) (2018). Current Problems of Financial Management: Global Trends and National Practice. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
3. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.) (2017). Public Finance of Ukraine: Development and Change Management (Economic Security Issues). Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
4. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.) (2016). Current problems of public finance management system development: European integration context. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
5. Gasanov, S. S., Kudrjashov, V. P., & Balakin, R. L. (2019). Supranational fiscal rules and coordination of budgetary policy in the European Union. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 37–55. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.03.037
6. Gasanov, S. S., Kudrjashov, V. P., & Balakin, R. L. (2015). Foreign experience of insuring the transparency of operations in fiscal area and its application in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 22–42 [in Ukrainian].
7. Gasanov, S. S., Kudrjashov, V. P., & Balakin, R. L. (2015). Reforming the Ukrainian fiscal system in the context of European integration processes. Finance of Ukraine, 5, 16–38 [in Ukrainian].
8. European Parliament. (2020, January). Implementation of the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure: State of Play. Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2016/497739/IPOL_IDA(2016)497739_EN.pdf.
9. European Commission. (2019, January). Report on Public Finances in EMU 2018. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/info/publications/economy-finance/report-public-finances-emu-2018_en.
10. European Commission. (2019, December 17). Alert Mechanism Report 2020. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0651&from=EN.
11. European Fiscal Board. (2019, October 29). Annual Report 2019. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2019-annual-report-european-fiscal-board_en.
12. European Fiscal Board. (2019, August). Assessment of EU fiscal rules with a focus on the six and two-pack legislation. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/2019-09-10-assessment-of-eu-fiscal-rules_en.pdf.
13. Budina N., Schaechter, A., Weber, A., & Kinda, T. (2016). Fiscal Rules in Response to the Crisis - Toward the “Next Generation” Rules. A New Dataset. IMF Working Papers, 12/187. doi.org/10.5089/9781475505351.001
14. Candiano, M., Curristine, T., & Lazare, M. (Eds.). (2013). Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture, 109–131. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
15. Lledó, V., Yoon, S., Fang, X., Mbaye, S. & and Kim, Y. (2017, March). Fiscal Rules at a Glance. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/datamapper/fiscalrules/Fiscal%20Rules%20at%20a%20Glance%20-%20Background%20Paper.pdf.
16. Debrum X., & Kinda T. (2016). Strengthening Post-Crisis Fiscal Credibility: Fiscal Councils on the Rise – A New Dataset. IMF Working Papers, 14/58. doi.org/10.5089/9781475516135.001
17. Beetsma, R., Debrun, X., Fang, X., Kim, Y., Lledó, V., Mbaye, S., & Zhang, X. (2019). Independent fiscal councils: Recent trends and performance. European Journal of Political Economy, 57(C), 53–69. Ddoi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.07.004
18. Wyplosz, Ch. (2019). Fiscal Discipline: From Theory to Practice. Independent Fiscal Institutions in the EU Fiscal Framework. Brussels. Retrieved from op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5cdfe914-7d04-11e9-9f05-01aa75ed71a1.
19. European Commission. (2019). Report on Public Finances in EMU 2018. Institutional Paper, 95. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/ip095_en.pdf.
20. European Commission. (2019). Fiscal Sustainability Report 2018. Institutional Paper, 94. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/ip094_en_vol_1.pdf.
21. EU Council. (2011, 8 November). Directive on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States, Chap. IV. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:306:0041:0047:EN:PDF.
22. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Article 121. (2016). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12016E121.
23. Von der Layen, U. (2019, 16 July). Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission 2019–2024. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/political-guidelines-next-commission_en_0.pdf.
24. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2011, November 16). Regulation (EU) amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 on strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32011R1175.
25. Balakin, R. L., & Kudrjashov, V. P. (2018). Fiscal rules and their application in budget policy. Iefymenko, T. I. (Ed.) Current Problems of Financial Management: Global Trends and National Practice, 72–93. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management” [in Ukrainian].
26. Consolidated version of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union. Article 126. (2016). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12016E126.
27. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Protocol No 12. On the excessive deficit procedure. (2016). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12016E/PRO/12.
28. EU Council (2005, June 27). Regulation (EC) No. 1055/2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32005R1055.
29. Larch, M., Orseau, E., & von der Weelen W. (2020). Do EU Fiscal Rules Support or Hinder Counter-Cyclical Fiscal Policy? JRC Working Papers on Taxation and Structural Reforms, 01, 1–50.
30. European Parliament, & EU Council. (2020, May 25). Decision (EU) on providing macro-financial assistance to enlargement and neighbourhood partners in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020D0701&from=EN.
31. World Bank. (n. d.). World Bank Governance Indicators 2018. Retrieved from info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports.