|
№ 12/2015№ 12/2015 | Fìnansi Ukr. 2015 (12): 63–72 | BUDGET POLICY KUZKIN Yevhen 1, KOTLJAREVSKYJ Jaroslav 2, SHYSHKO Oleksandr 3 1State Agency of Motor Roads of Ukraine
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6790-8238
2SESE “Academy of Financial Management”, Research ID : http://www.researcherid.com/rid/I-4694-2017
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3542-6952
3State Educational and Research Organization “Academy of Financial Management”
Foreign experience of fiscal decentralization: problems and their solution ways
In critical conditions of operation of public finance in the period of 2008-2010, for most developed countries economic and social conditions were significantly deteriorated. In the article the advantages and disadvantages of anti-crisis reform of public finances in these countries in terms of fiscal decentralization are observed. It indicates the flexibility in application of progressive forms of intergovernmental transfers, streamlining the budgetary rules and procedures. The necessity of integrated approach to the implementation of the fiscal decentralization is reasoned. This approach is agreed to implement sector reforms, reform of administrative and territorial structure. The features of realization of the fiscal relations structural reform between levels of government in developed European countries during the 2008-2010 crisis and post-crisis period are observed. The negative trends that have provoked significant reduction in fiscal revenues not only to central government but also to local budgets, and thus have led to risks of non-compliance with budgetary discipline, are investigated. The experience of the decision-making management procedures in the area of public finances are generalized, that in high efficiency of state and local institutions could lead to effective and efficient respond to the causes and consequences of a crisis. Keywords:intergovernmental transfers, fiscal decentralization, public finance JEL: H60, H67
Kuzkin Y. . Foreign experience of fiscal decentralization: problems and their solution ways / Y. . Kuzkin, J. . Kotljarevskyj, O. . SHYSHKO // Фінанси України. - 2015. - № 12. - C. 63-72. | Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 63 - 72) | Download | Downloads :834 |
1. Andrushhenko, V. L. (2013). Mizhbyudzhetni vidnosyny v Ukrayini ta mizhnarodnyj dosvid [Intergovernmental relations in Ukraine and international experience]. Zbirnyk naukovykh pracz’ Irpins’koyi finansovo-yurydychnoyi akademiyi [Proceedings of Irpin financial-legal academy], 2, 5-10 [in Ukrainian].
2. Blankart, Ch. B. (2000). Derzhavni finansy v umovakh demokratiyi. Vstup do finansovoyi nauky [Public finances in a democracy. Introduction to Financial science]. Kyiv: Lybid’ [in Ukrainian].
3. Buryachenko, A. Ye. (2014). Funkcional’na decentralizaciya ta vdoskonalennya systemy byudzhetnykh vidnosyn [Functional decentralization and improvement of budgetary relations]. Finansy Ukrayiny [Finance of Ukraine], 2, 19-29 [in Ukrainian].
4. Vammalle, C., & Hulbert, C. (2013). Sub-national Finances and Fiscal Consolidation: Walking on Thin Ice. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 02. doi: 10.1787/20737009.
5. Lunina, I. O. (2010). Formuvannya miscevykh byudzhetiv na osnovi pryncypu ekvivalentnosti: shlyakh do efektyvnoyi byudzhetnoyi systemy Ukrayiny [Formation of local budgets on the equivalence principle: the way to efficient budgetary system in Ukraine]. Finansy Ukrayiny [Finance of Ukraine], 9, 3-12 [in Ukrainian].
6. Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2000). Latvia’s Equalization Fund. International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. Georgia State University.
7. Olson, M., Jr. (1969). The principle of ‘Fiscal Equivalence’: the division of responsibilities among different levels of government. The American Economic Review, 59 (2), 479—487. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1823700.
8. Oparin, V. M. (2015). Dominanty ta priorytety finansovoho vyrivnyuvannya v Ukrayini [Dominants and priorities of financial equalization in Ukraine]. Finansy Ukrayiny [Finance of Ukraine], 6, 29-43 [in Ukrainian].
9. Pavlyuk, K. V. (2006). Byudzhet i byudzhetnyj proces v umovakh tranzytyvnoyi ekonomiky Ukrayiny [The budget and the budget process in the conditions of transitive economy of Ukraine]. Kyiv: NDFI [in Ukrainian].
10. Slukhaj, S. (2002). Mizhbyudzhetni transferty u postsocialistychnykh krayinakh: vid teoriyi do realij [Intergovernmental transfers in the post-socialist countries: from theory to reality]. Kyiv: ArtEk [in Ukrainian].
11. Ter-Minassian, Т. (2007). Fiscal Rules for Subnational Governments: Can They Promote Fiscal Discipline? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 6 (3). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/43469443.pdf.
|
