Issued since 1995
Welcome to the Finance of Ukraine site (demo).
Login | Register
ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.


№ 7/2020

№ 7/2020

Fìnansi Ukr. 2020 (7): 47–61
https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.07.047

PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT

IVANYTSKA Olga 1, KOSHCHUK Tetiana 2

1National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5505-8849
2SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-4603


Fiscal risk management in conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic


The article is devoted to identifying directions of fiscal risk management caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The main IMF documents containing recommendations and warnings on public financial management in the conditions of significant shocks are analyzed. It is argued that the COVID-19 pandemic poses large exogenous fiscal risks that have a discrete, unpredictable and nonlinear effect as well as a potentially high threat to fiscal stability. The governments of the countries affected by the pandemic need to find out what consequences these phenomena may have for the budget and for the socio-economic sphere. The wide range of Governments’ measures to address the macroeconomic and social challenges posed by the pandemic is determined. They can be divided into budget measures (budget expenditures and the introduction of changes in taxation); non-budgetary or “extra-budgetary” measures (government expenditures that affect public debt and budget financing); government guarantees and quasi-fiscal transactions. It is mentioned that Governments often allow significant deviations from the basic fiscal rules by implementing “rescue” policies and taking emergency measures to improve the socio-economic situation. Emphasis must be placed on the need to adhere to the following approaches when making government decisions to move away from strict fiscal rules: comparing the effect obtained in the socio-economic sphere, and the possibility of a negative impact of measures on fiscal stability; ensuring transparency and control ; establishing the level of deviation from the legally defined budget indicators; and regulating the processes and procedures for returning to the application of rules; use of fiscally safe instruments. It is underlined the importance of the centralized approach to public finance management, in particular by creating an interagency group of crisis financial management. Some provisions of the Memorandum on Economic and Financial Policy within the framework of Ukraine’s cooperation with the IMF are analyzed.

Keywords:fiscal risks, macroeconomic shocks, consequences of COVID-19, fiscal rules, fiscal stability

JEL: E62, H21, L32


IVANYTSKA O. . Fiscal risk management in conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic / O. . IVANYTSKA, T. . Koshchuk // Фінанси України. - 2020. - № 7. - C. 47-61.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 47 - 61) DownloadDownloads :136
1. Andersen, T. M. (2012). Fiscal sustainability and fiscal policy targets. Economics Working Papers, 15. Retrieved from pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3980/92720fb3d0c22e0e20a99c480962f15a30c7.pdf.
2. Balassone, F., Langenus, G., Manzke, B., Manzke, B., Pavot, J., Prammer, D. et al. (2009, January). Fiscal sustainability and policy implications for the euro area. ECB Working Paper, 994, 1–44. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1684453
3. Burnside, C. (Ed.). (2005). Fiscal sustainability in theory and practice (a handbook). Washington, D. C.: World Bank. doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-5874-0
4. Bi, H. (2017). Fiscal Sustainability: A Cross-Country Analysis. Economic Review, Q IV, 5–35. Retrieved from www.kansascityfed.org/~/media/files/publicat/econrev/econrevarchive/
2017/4q17bi.pdf.
5. Cebotari, A. Davis, J., Lusinyan, L., Mati, A., Mauro, P., Petrie M. et al. (2008). Fiscal risks: sources, disclosure, and management. Washington, D. C.: International Monetary Fund. doi.org/10.5089/9781498334525.007
6. IMF. (2016, June). Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks – Best Practices. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2016/050416.pdf.
7. Gasanov, S. (2017). Fiscal risks and fiscal targeting in the system of public finance management under institutional uncertainty. RFI Scientific Papers, 2, 5–24. DOI: 10.33763/npndfi2017.02.005 [in Ukrainian].
8. Lunina, I. (2017). Risks of the long-term solvency of the state. Finance of Ukraine, 4, 7–20 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2017.04.007
9. Gasanov, S., & Kudrjashov, V. (2015). The budget deficit restrictions in conditions of fiscal risks. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 5–14 [in Ukrainian].
10. Bohdan, I., Konovalenko, D., & Yara, T. (2018). Economic mathematical models for the diagnostics of fiscal policy. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 43–66 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.03.043
11. Ivanytska, O., & Koschuk, T. (2018). Methodological grounds of fiscal risks identification. Finance of Ukraine, 6, 45–57 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.06.045
12. Ivanytska, O., & Koschuk, T. (2018). Application of IMF recommendations and world experience in fiscal risk management practices. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 39–53 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.11.039
13. Iefymenko, T. (2017). Fiscal space and stabilization of public finance. Finance of Ukraine, 9, 7–28 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2017.09.007
14. Bohdan, T. (2018). Fiscal policy coordination and limatation of government debt and deficit in the EU. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 24–42 [in Ukrainian].
15. Gasanov, S., Kudrjashov, V., & Balakin, R. (2019). Supranational fiscal rules and coordination of budgetary policy in the European Union. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 37–55 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.03.037
16. Kudrjashov, V. (2018). Management of budget operations according to fiscal rules. Finance of Ukraine, 12, 31–51 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.12.031
17. IMF. (2012, August). Fiscal Accountability, Transparency and Risk. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2012/080712.pdf.
18. Olden, B. (2017, February). Fiscal Risks Analysis and Management. Retrieved from www.imf.org/~/media/Files/News/Seminars/IMF-JICA_Conference_020117_Olden.ashx.
19. Balibek, E., Sayegh, A., Saxena, S., Stone, M., & Wendling, C. (2020, April 6). Managing Fiscal Risks Under Fiscal Stress. Retrieved from www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/covid19-special-notes/Russian/ru-special-series-on-covid-19-managing-fiscal-risks-under-fiscal-stress.ashx?la=en [in Russian].
20. IMF. (2020, April 6). Tax Issues: An Overview. Retrieved from www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/covid19-special-notes/Russian/ru-special-series-on-covid-19-tax-issues-an-overview.ashx?la=en [in Russian].
21. Wyplosz, C. (2013). Fiscal Rules: Theoretical Issues and Historical Experience. Alesina, A, & Giavazzi, F. Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis, 495–525. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226018584.003.0013
22. Gbohoui, W., & Medas, P. (2020, April 29). Fiscal Rules, Escape Clauses, and Large Shocks. Retrieved from www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/covid19-special-notes/Russian/ruspecial-series-on-covid19fiscal-rules-escape-clauses-and-large-shocks.ashx [in Russian].
23. Khasiani, K., Koshima, Y., Mfombouot, A., & Singh, A. (2020, May 20) Budget Execution Controls to Mitigate Corruption Risk in Pandemic Spending. Retrieved from www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/covid19-special-notes/Russian/ruspecial-series-on-covid19budget-execution-controls-to-mitigate-corruption-risk-in-pandemic-spendin.ashx?la=en [in Russian].
24. Ukraine. (2020, June 2). Letter of Intent: Memorandum on Economic and Financial Policy. Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/18%20-%20Department/
18%20-%20PDF/memorandum-pro-ekonomichnu-ta-finansovu-politiku-mvf-vid-02-06-2020.pdf [in Ukrainian].
25. Koschuk, T. (2020). Theoretical grounds and experience of taxation of the novel nicotine-consuming products in EU countries: conclusions for Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 2, 38–54 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.02.038