№ 1/2023

Fìnansi Ukr. 2023 (1): 48–64https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.01.048

PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT

BOHDAN Tetiana ¹

¹NGO “Growford Institute”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-5336

Upgrading the fiscal rules system in the European Union and prospects for their reforms in Ukraine

Introduction. In 2022 and 2023 fiscal rules in Ukraine were suspended by amendments to the Budget Code, although after the end of war the negotiation process with the EU on its enlargement will put the issue of resumption of the fiscal rules in Ukraine and their alignment with the EU norms on the economic reforms’ agenda in Ukraine.
Problem Statement. Restoration of the system of fiscal rules in Ukraine and its new substantive filling on the way of Ukraine’s preparation for the EU accession taking into account the experience of implementation of the supra-national fiscal rules in the EU and challenges for the reforms of the budgetary framework in the EU member states.
Purpose – drawing lessons of functioning of the numerical fiscal rules in the EU, reviewing the components of transformation of the budgetary framework and mechanisms of the fiscal policy surveillance from the side of the EU supra-national bodies and eventually, on their basis, specifying the core directions of reforming fiscal rules in Ukraine for their approximation to the EU standards.
Methods. General scientific and special methods are applied: analysis and synthesis, description and comparison, historical method, method of theoretical generalization and abstract-logical method.
Results. The article highlights the essence of fiscal rules as important constituents of modern fiscal institutions, shows the quantitative indicators of extension of the fiscal rules across the world and their common combinations. It reveals the main trends in modification of the fiscal rules and validation of the escape clauses in the course of corona-crisis. The author summarizes the mechanisms of budget deficit regulation, containment of public expenditure growth and limiting public debt level in the EU member states with a focus on the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact and of the EU Regulations, which specify the tools of application of the Pact and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The author synthetizes the key dimensions of current transformation of the EU fiscal rules with an emphasize on the instruments of fiscal policy surveillance in the EU member states and targeting fiscal policy at achieving green and digital transition by their economies with simultaneous debt sustainability goal. Policy proposals are devised for upgrading the system of fiscal rules in Ukraine and their validation after finishing the war.
Conclusions. Incorporation of debt limit and budget balance ceiling across the sector of general government into the budgetary legislation of Ukraine, as well as of net primary expenditure rule aimed at restoration of the debt sustainability, as well as mechanisms of implementation of the fiscal rules and independent monitoring of the fiscal rules observance in line with the EU standards (over the medium run) would contribute to securing macro-financial stability in Ukraine and accelerate the economic and political integration of Ukraine with the EU.

Keywords:fiscal rules, the EU, fiscal policy surveillance, debt limit, net primary expenditure

JEL: F36, H62, H63, H87

BOHDAN T. . Upgrading the fiscal rules system in the European Union and prospects for their reforms in Ukraine / T. . BOHDAN // Фінанси України. - 2023. - № 1. - C. 48-64.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 48 - 64)

Download

Downloads :132

1. EU Council. (2011, November 8). Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv: OJ.L_.2011.306.01.0041.01.ENG.
2. Eyraud, L., & Wu, T. (2015). Playing by the Rules: Reforming Fiscal Governance in Europe. IMF Working Paper, 2015/067. March 24. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/Playing-by-the-Rules-Reforming-Fiscal-Governance-in-Europe-42804.
3. Buti, M., & Franko, D. (2005). Fiscal Policy in Economic and Monetary Union: Theory, Evidence, and Institutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi.org/10.4337/9781845426712
4. Leeper, E. M. (2009). Anchoring Fiscal Expectations. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, 72 (3) 17–42. doi.org/10.3386/w15269
5. Schaechter, A., Kinda, T., Budina, N., & Weber A. (2016). Fiscal Rules in Response to the Crisis – Toward the “Next-Generation” Rules. A New Dataset. Working Paper, 2012/187. doi.org/10.5089/9781475505351.001
6. Kopits, G. (2011). Independent Fiscal Institutions: Developing Good Practices. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 11/3. doi.org/10.1787/budget-11-5kg3pdgcpn42
7. Cangiano, M., Curristine, T., & Lazare, M. (2013). Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture. Washington: International Monetary Fund. doi.org/10.5089/9781475531091.071
8. Iefymenko, T. (2017). Fiscal space and stabilization of public finance. Finance of Ukraine, 9, 7–28 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2017.09.007
9. Iefymenko, T. (2016). Fiscal Reforms and Sustainable Development in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 7–14. Retrieved from finukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&aid=4298.
10. Bohdan, I., Yara, T., & Konovalenko, D. (2016). Diagnostics of general government position in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 4, 27–49. Retrieved from finukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&aid=4316 [in Ukrainian].
11. Gasanov, S., Kudrjashov, V., & Balakin, R. (2014). The EU public finance crisis management experience and its implementation in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 7, 17–30. Retrieved from finukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&aid=4116 [in Ukrainian].
12. Gasanov, S., Kudrjashov, V., & Balakin, R. (2019). Supranational fiscal rules and coordination of budgetary policy in the European Union. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 37–55 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.03.037
13. Gasanov, S. (2018). Fiscal rules and fiscal responsibility: economic security context. Finance of Ukraine, 3. 7–23 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.03.007
14. Davoodi, H., Elger, P., Fotiou, A., Garcia-Macia, D., Han, X., Lagerborg, A. et al. (2022). Fiscal Rules and Fiscal Councils: Recent Trends and Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic. IMF Working Paper, 2022/011. doi.org/10.5089/9798400200472.001
15. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. (2012). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= celex%3A12012E%2FTXT
16. The Stability and Growth Pact. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.cvce.eu/en/recherche/unit-content/-/unit/02bb76df-d066-4c08-a58a-d4686a3e68ff/d251a863-9ebf-4537-8b92-a036334ae094.
17. EU Council. (1999, July 7). Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= celex:31997R1466.
18. EU Council. (1999, July 7). Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:31997R1467.
19. Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union. (2012). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:1403_3
20. European Commission. (2022, November 9). Building an economic governance framework fit for the challenges ahead. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_6562.
21. Eyraud, L., Debrun, X., Hodge, A., Duarte Lledo, V., & A Pattillo C. (2018, April 13). Second-Generation Fiscal Rules: Balancing Simplicity, Flexibility, and Enforceability. IMF Staff Discussion Notes, 2018/004. doi.org/10.5089/9781484350683.006
22. Eurostat. (2019). Manual on Government deficit and debt 2019. Implementation of ESA 2010. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/ks-gq-19-007.