№ 4/2023

Fìnansi Ukr. 2023 (4): 7–35https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.04.007

TAX POLICY

SOKOLOVSKA Alla ¹, RAINOVA Larysa ²

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-8215
²SESE "The Academy of Financial Management"
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8275-3094

Scenarios of personal income tax reform in the context of reducing income inequality in Ukraine

Introduction. The aggravation of the problem of inequality and poverty in the conditions of Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine determines giving priority to its mitigation in the period of post-war reconstruction. At the same time, ensuring the reduction of income inequality in the period after the termination or abolition of martial law is expected to be achieved by using the redistributive role of taxes, primarily personal income tax.
Problem Statement. Although a progressive income tax is considered to be one of the main tools for reducing inequality, a proportional personal income tax can also increase the progressivity of taxation through a well-designed mechanism of tax-exempt amount.
The purpose of the article is to analyze the state of fulfillment of the function of reducing income inequality by the personal income tax in Ukraine and ways to increase its redistributive properties.
Methods. The redistributive properties of personal income tax were studied by determining the impact of the tax social benefit before and after its reform on the tax burden at different levels of income, which was calculated on the basis of effective personal income tax rates. The assessment of the fiscal consequences of the proposed reforms was carried out using information from the Pension Fund of Ukraine on the number of people receiving wages in a certain income range.
Results. It was established that the flat personal income tax in Ukraine does not fulfill the function of reducing income inequality due to existing restrictions on the right to apply the tax social benefit, which cannot be used even by the recipients of the minimum wage. This creates the problem of a high tax burden on people with low incomes. In order to increase the impact of the tax on income redistribution, the feasibility of introducing in Ukraine a differentiated tax social benefit for the taxpayer, as well as a tax social benefit for dependents (wife/husband and children) is substantiated. Another option for increasing the progression in personal income taxation was considered – the introduction of a low-progressive/progressive tax model in combination with the existing and differentiated tax social benefit.
Conclusions. An assessment of the impact of the proposed personal income tax reforms on the tax burden at different levels of income, as well as their fiscal consequences, was carried out. Possible risks, as well as the procedure for reforming the tax, are substantiated.

Keywords:income inequality, flat personal income tax, progressive personal income tax, differentiated tax social benefit, effective tax rates

JEL: H21, H24, I31, I32

Sokolovska A. . Scenarios of personal income tax reform in the context of reducing income inequality in Ukraine / A. . Sokolovska, L. . RAINOVA // Фінанси України. - 2023. - № 4. - C. 7-35.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 7 - 35)

Download

Downloads :100

1. Bourguignon, F. (2018). World changes in inequality: an overview of facts, causes, consequences and policies. CESifo Economic Studies, 64 (3), 345–370. doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifx028
2. European Commission. (2018). Tax Policies in the European Union. 2018 Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-05/2018-tax-survey-report.pdf.
3. Slovo i dilo (2023). How the level of poverty in Ukraine changed. Retrieved from www.slovoidilo.ua/2023/05/04/infografika/ekonomika/yak-zminyuvavsya-riven-bidnosti-ukrayini [in Ukrainian].
4. Joumard, I., Pisu, M., & Bloch, D. (2012). Tackling income inequality: The role of taxes and transfers. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2012/1. doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2012-5k95xd6l65lt
5. Akgun, O., Cournède, B., & Fournier, J. (2017). The effects of the tax mix on inequality and growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1447. doi.org/10.1787/c57eaa14-en
6. Doumbia, D., & Kinda, T. (2019). Reallocating public spending to reduce income inequality: can it work? IMF Working Paper, 188. doi.org/10.5089/9781513511863.001
7. Wildowicz-Szumarska, A. (2022). Is redistributive policy of EU welfare state effective in tackling income inequality? A panel data analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17 (1), 81–101. doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.004
8. Causa, O., & Hermansen, M. (2017). Income redistribution through taxes and transfers across OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1453. doi.org/10.1787/bc7569c6-en
9. Cantante, F. (2020). Four profiles of inequality and tax redistribution in Europe. Humanities and social sciences communications, 7 (33). doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0514-4
10. Chen, T., Hallaert, J.-J., Pitt, A., Qu, H., Queyranne, M., Rhee, A. et al. Inequality and poverty across generations in the European Union. IMF Staff Discussion Notes, SDN/18/01. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3127781
11. Kotler, P. (n. d.). Tools to Reduce Income and Wealth Inequality. Retrieved from www.wicked7.org/12-tools-to-reduce-income-and-wealth-inequality/.
12. European Commission, Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union. (2022). Annual report on taxation 2022: tax policies in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from data.europa.eu/doi/10.2778/64681.
13. Buchanan, J. M., & Musgrave, R. A. (2004). Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Kyiv: KM Akademiia [in Ukrainian].
14. Inchauste, G., & Karver, J. (2017). Fiscal Redistribution in the European Union Background to “Growing United: Upgrading Europe’s Convergence Machine (World Bank report on the European Union). Retrieved from thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/632981520461235859-0080022018/original/EUIGReportFiscalRedistribution.pdf.
15. Kovács, B. (2022). Flat-rate personal income tax in Lithuania, Romania and Hungary: A revolutionary policy idea without revolutionary outcomes. Journal of European Social Policy, 32 (1), 60–74. doi.org/10.1177/09589287211035707
16. Król, A., Myck, M., & Trzciński, K. (2022, December). Poland (PL) 2019–2022 (Country Report) (EUROMOD version 15.0+. EUROMOD – Tax-benefit microsimulation model for the European Union). Retrieved from euromod-web.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2023-01/Y13_CR_PL_Final.pdf.
17. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (n. d.). Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
18. “LIGA: LAW” information system. (n. d.). Retrieved from ips.ligazakon.net/ [in Ukrainian].
19. Sokolovska, A., & Rainova, L. (2019). Influence of taxes on income inequality in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 7, 72–91 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.07.072
20. EUROMOD 2019–2022 (2022, December). Country Reports. Version 15.0.+. Retrieved from euromod-web.jrc.ec.europa.eu/resources/country-reports/latest.
21. European Commission. (n. d.). Tax in Europe Database. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/tedb/taxSearch.html.
22. Ernst & Young. (2023). February. Worldwide Personal Tax and Immigration Guide 2022-23. Retrieved from assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/tax/tax-guides/2023/ey-personal-tax-immigration-guide-10-mar-2023-update.pdf?download.
23. Cabinet of Ministers (2017). Rules on the tax-free minimum and the amount of tax relief for the calculation of personal income tax. (Regulation No. 676/2017, November 14). Retrieved from likumi.lv/ta/id/295500-noteikumi-par-neapliekama-minimuma-un-nodokla-atvieglojuma-apmeru-iedzivotaju-ienakuma-nodokla-aprekinasanai [in Latvian].
24. Report on the work and implementation of the budget of the Pension Fund of Ukraine in 2022. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/17-civik-2018/zvit2022/ZVIT%20PFU%202022.pdf [in Ukrainian].
25. Schneider, F., & Asllani, A. Taxation of the Informal Economy in the EU (2022). European Parliament. 202Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/734007/IPOL_STU(2022)734007_EN.pdf.