№ 1/2021

Fìnansi Ukr. 2021 (1): 83–102https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2021.01.083

INSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY

KULYK Volodymyr ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-2795

Japan experience: system analysis and modelling inter-industry relations

The scheme of analysis and modelling inter-industry relations used by the Government of Japan in the planning and maintenance of economic proportions is considered. A scheme of the circulation of the Japanese economy has been prepared, coming out of the Input-Output table for 2015. On the basis of the input-output table of Japan (2015) it was prepared aggregated input-output tables of Japanese economy dimensions of 13 types of economic activity and 3 consolidated activities (primary, secondary, tertiary sectors). The Input-Output tables are prepared in a competitive-import version, which is the most common in Japan. On the basis of aggregated Input-Output Tables, the analysis of the development of sectors of Japan's economy during 1990-2015 was conducted. The classification of industries on the core ones, with direct influence as well as with inverse influence, etc. was carried out. Structural changes in GDP at final costs, production method and income categories are analyzed. A visual assessment of the volatility of the GDP structure was carried out. The factors of added value, import, impact are analyzed. The necessity of using aggregated input-output models to assess reproduction proportions, the state of the production system and its efficiency is substantiated. A promising direction of research and practical use is the use of the research schemes for studying and modelling the economy of Ukraine, for scientific and educational purposes, preparation of a competitive-import version of the input-output tables of Ukraine of different degrees of aggregation, conducting comparative researches of the development of economic systems, etc.

Keywords:Japanese economy, economic cycle, input-output table, types of economic activity, data aggregation, system analysis, modelling inter-industry relations

JEL: C13, C67, D57, E23

Kulyk V. . Japan experience: system analysis and modelling inter-industry relations / V. Kulyk // Фінанси України. - 2021. - № 1. - C. 83-102.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 83 - 102)

Download

Downloads :97

1. Kuboniva, M., Tabata, M., Tabata, S., & Hasebe, Y. (1991). Mathematical economics on a personal computer. Moscow: Finance and Statistics [in Russian].
2. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (n. d.). Input-Output Tables for Japan. Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/english/dgpp_ss/data/io/index.htm.
3. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2000). The Japanese economy and the 2000 Input-Output Tables. Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000449858.pdf.
4. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2005). The Japanese economy and the 2005 Input-Output Tables. Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000327476.pdf.
5. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2011). The Japanese economy and the 2011 Input-Output Tables. Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000443188.pdf.
6. Leontiev, V. V. (2006–2007). Selected works (in 3 Vols.). Moscow: Economics [in Russian]
7. Tsukui, J., & Murakami, Y. (1979). Turnpike Optimality in Input-output Systems: Theory and Application for Planning. New York: Holland North Publishing Company.
8. Morishsima, M. (1972). Equilibrium, Resilience, Growth: A Multisectoral Analysis. Moscow: Science [in Russian].
9. Planning Bureau, Government of Japan. (1999). Multi-Sectoral Economic Models for Medium and Long-term Analysis. Econometric Model Analysis Section. Tokyo: Economic Planning Agency.
10. Tatemoto, M., & Ichimura, S. (1959). Factor Proportions and Foreign Trade: The Case of Japan. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 41 (4), 442–446. doi.org/10.2307/1927275
11. Ichimura, S. (1968). Factors for Rapid Growth of the Japanese Economy: A Social Accounting Approach. doi.org/10.1142/9789812834621_0002
12. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (n. d.). Role of the Director-General for Policy Planning (Statistical Standards). Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/english/dgpp_ss/seido/guide/2011ver/07.htm.
13. Research and Statistics Department Economic and Industrial Policy Bureau Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). (2010, March). 2005 Inter-Regional Input-Output Table. Retrieved from www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/tyo/tiikiio/pdf/2005report.pdf.
14. Institute of Developing Economies Japan External Trade Organization Japan. (2005). Asian International Input-Output Table 2005. Technical notes. Retrieved from www.ide.go.jp/library/Japanese/Publish/Books/Tokei/pdf/2005ASIA_Technical
Notes.pdf.
15. Yastremskii, O. (2020). Input-Output Productivity Cost Analysis of the Economy of Ukraine: Selected Cross-Countries and Intertemporal Comparison. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 56 (4), 591–602. doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00276-z
16. Yastremskyi, O. (2017). Uncertainty in input-output scheme: comparative inter-country analysis. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 21–35 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2017.03.021
17. Portal Site of Official Statistics of Japan. (2015). 2015 Input-Output Tables. Retrieved from www.e-stat.go.jp/en/stat-search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00200603&tstat=000001130583&cycle=0&year=20150&month=0&tclass1val=0.
18. Kulyk, V. (2020). Analysis of Japan’s and Ukraine’s sectoral structure of the economy within the framework of the aggregated input-output models. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 109–127 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2020.03.109
19. Yastremsky, O., & Kulyk, V. (2020). Volatility of the structure of intersectoral relations of ukraine’s economy. Economy and forecasting, 2, 61–79 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/eip2020.02.061
20. Rasmussen, P. N. (1956). Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21. Yastremskii, O. (2018). Key and effective economic activities of ukraine. Herald of the Economic Sciences of Ukraine, 2, 177–182 [in Ukrainian].
22. Kulyk, V. V. (2016). Model of decentralized management: from simple training to the model of the real economy. In Modeling the behavior of business entities in a changing market environment, 244–259. Berdiansk: A. Tkachuk [in Ukrainian].
23. Yastremskyi, O., & Kulyk, V. (2020). Volatility of the financial flows structure of Ukraine’s economy. RFI Scientific Papers, 2, 24–34 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2020.02.024